Maricopa County Election Audit

[Pale Rider]

I don’t have a narrative but the narrative that continues to be pushed on this board is clear: “The government will save you. Trust the plan. Baaa baaa MAGA sheep.”

No, you most certainly do have a narrative, and it’s to troll ever political thread to try and elicit negative responses.
You are condescending, confrontational, and serve no purpose here other than to distract.
Frame it how you want, but all you do is cause discontent for either your agenda or entertainment or probably both.
Quit trying to play yourself off as the voice of reasonable, your nothing more than a troll.

The only question I have is which Bloomburg funded anti-2nd organization is paying the troll to come here every day to play his ridiculous games.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Internet%20Troll

 

[Pale Rider]

Karl Denninger sums it up well.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243697

Yes, Denninger is one smart guy. Everyone should read that, he's a computer expert too, so he does sum it up well.

 

[xerts1191]

Karl Denninger sums it up well.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243697

Yeah what this guy said

 

[xerts1191]

https://beckernews.com/narrative-collapse-british-media-finally-appear-to-be-questioning-bidens-u-s-election-legitimacy-41960/
Looks like Jobama has the Brits scratching their heads

 

[TheAccountant]

I don’t have a narrative but the narrative that continues to be pushed on this board is clear: “The government will save you. Trust the plan. Baaa baaa MAGA sheep.”

No, you most certainly do have a narrative, and it’s to troll ever political thread to try and elicit negative responses.
You are condescending, confrontational, and serve no purpose here other than to distract.
Frame it how you want, but all you do is cause discontent for either your agenda or entertainment or probably both.
Quit trying to play yourself off as the voice of reasonable, your nothing more than a troll.

The only question I have is which Bloomburg funded anti-2nd organization is paying the troll to come here every day to play his ridiculous games.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Internet%20Troll

Your little definition doesn’t include “anyone who doesn’t agree with ignorant opinions.”

It’s funny that you think you, or the other few in your narrow-minded clan, are important enough for anyone to pay to try to influence.

 

[AZ_Five56]

No, you most certainly do have a narrative, and it’s to troll ever political thread to try and elicit negative responses.
You are condescending, confrontational, and serve no purpose here other than to distract.
Frame it how you want, but all you do is cause discontent for either your agenda or entertainment or probably both.
Quit trying to play yourself off as the voice of reasonable, your nothing more than a troll.

The only question I have is which Bloomburg funded anti-2nd organization is paying the troll to come here every day to play his ridiculous games.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Internet%20Troll

Your little definition doesn’t include “anyone who doesn’t agree with ignorant opinions.”

It’s funny that you think you, or the other few in your narrow-minded clan, are important enough for anyone to pay to try to influence.

There are a handful of people on this forum that regularly get into spats with others. I generally think they mean well even if I completely disagree with them or how they've approached conflict, and sometimes I think they perceive something to be conflict when it was nothing at all. These individuals that I'm thinking of are sometimes looked at as trouble makers, but at other times have been really helpful and generous members of the site. I can not say as much for you. I can't think of a time when you have added to a conversation, and usually, a thread is worse for having your input. I'm interested to hear someone's constructive criticism, but you are anything but constructive. You are the definition of a troll.

 

[cool arrow]

I can not say as much for you. I can't think of a time when you have added to a conversation, and usually, a thread is worse for having your input.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQCU36pkH7c

"At no point in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

 

[Old Jeff H]

:lol:

 

[Gunslinger808]

No, you most certainly do have a narrative, and it’s to troll ever political thread to try and elicit negative responses.
You are condescending, confrontational, and serve no purpose here other than to distract.
Frame it how you want, but all you do is cause discontent for either your agenda or entertainment or probably both.
Quit trying to play yourself off as the voice of reasonable, your nothing more than a troll.

The only question I have is which Bloomburg funded anti-2nd organization is paying the troll to come here every day to play his ridiculous games.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Internet%20Troll

Your little definition doesn’t include “anyone who doesn’t agree with ignorant opinions.”

It’s funny that you think you, or the other few in your narrow-minded clan, are important enough for anyone to pay to try to influence.

And yet, here you are.
You seem to find importance in trying to argue and influence opinion in every political thread, and when that inevitably fails, you resort to petty squabbling.
You don’t like our opinions, feel free to leave, you wouldn’t be missed.

 

[Cubiclerevolt]

The only question I have is which Bloomburg funded anti-2nd organization is paying the troll to come here every day to play his ridiculous games.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Internet%20Troll

Your little definition doesn’t include “anyone who doesn’t agree with ignorant opinions.”

It’s funny that you think you, or the other few in your narrow-minded clan, are important enough for anyone to pay to try to influence.

And yet, here you are.
You seem to find importance in trying to argue and influence opinion in every political thread, and when that inevitably fails, you resort to petty squabbling.
You don’t like our opinions, feel free to leave, you wouldn’t be missed.

Take manitu with you as well.

 

[deadshot556]

Do you think the sheep who have repeatedly linked to fake news sites in the first 47 pages of this post are paid? Or are they not doubted because they’re feeding you information you desperately want to believe?

Hmm "no significant fraud", but no significant win, so minor fraud could easily effect a minor win.

There is just no ACCOUNTING for the Senselessness displayed in a couple posts here.

Baa baa sheep.

Yawn, you done there shareblue?

 

[deadshot556]

Do you think the sheep who have repeatedly linked to fake news sites in the first 47 pages of this post are paid? Or are they not doubted because they’re feeding you information you desperately want to believe?

Are you feeling like you need to SHARE why you’re so BLUE about it all?
Doesn’t fit your narrative so it’s automatically fake?

Once you understand the echo chamber here makes perfect sense, this about the reddest chamber I visit but echo chamber it is.

Wow, like narrow minded people at a gun forum, who’d have thought?
Maybe you’d be happier over at DU, they probably are more in line with your thinking.

So the sheep are the real conservatives and the ones who are gathering facts and forming their own opinions are the liberals now?

I don’t have a narrative but the narrative that continues to be pushed on this board is clear: “The government will save you. Trust the plan. Baaa baaa MAGA sheep.”

Yes you do, you all do.

 

[TheAccountant]

The only question I have is which Bloomburg funded anti-2nd organization is paying the troll to come here every day to play his ridiculous games.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Internet%20Troll

Your little definition doesn’t include “anyone who doesn’t agree with ignorant opinions.”

It’s funny that you think you, or the other few in your narrow-minded clan, are important enough for anyone to pay to try to influence.

There are a handful of people on this forum that regularly get into spats with others. I generally think they mean well even if I completely disagree with them or how they've approached conflict, and sometimes I think they perceive something to be conflict when it was nothing at all. These individuals that I'm thinking of are sometimes looked at as trouble makers, but at other times have been really helpful and generous members of the site. I can not say as much for you. I can't think of a time when you have added to a conversation, and usually, a thread is worse for having your input. I'm interested to hear someone's constructive criticism, but you are anything but constructive. You are the definition of a troll.

What a short memory you have. Just a couple pages back in this very thread I helped you and a couple others figure out the difference between a picture of an envelope and a ballot.

 

[YNOTAZ]

What a short memory you have. Just a couple pages back in this very thread I helped you and a couple others figure out the difference between a picture of an envelope and a ballot.

Arizona recognizes the "law of best evidence" When the ballots were destroyed the best remaining evidence is the digital "picture".

Find somebody the magically recovers the original ballots and your crap holds water, otherwise go back to counting your refried beans.

 

[TheAccountant]

What a short memory you have. Just a couple pages back in this very thread I helped you and a couple others figure out the difference between a picture of an envelope and a ballot.

Arizona recognizes the "law of best evidence" When the ballots were destroyed the best remaining evidence is the digital "picture".

Find somebody the magically recovers the original ballots and your crap holds water, otherwise go back to counting your refried beans.

You clearly didn’t put much thought into that one.

 

[xerts1911]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/cited_urls/20
If you guys get really bored. Scroll down to Brnovich vs. Democratic Nat. Committee. Opinions of the SC. 19-1257 Page 18 and beyond touch on the many things of interest pertaining to voter fraud, ballot harvesting, voter discrimination, sample ballots, mail in ballots etc. etc. Pgs.32-45.fraud etc. Pgs.45+ touch on the VRA act of 1965, interesting read.
Thanks to Admin for moving the thread to political section.

 

[vvalter_vvhite]

Is there a rally somewhere that aims to force the douchey to decertify the results of 2020 election ? If this happened the opposite way, i am sure there will be rallies everyday everywhere...

 

[smithers599]

OK, I have read the Executive Summary. Here are my observations:

1 – The fake news reported that a recount of all the ballots showed Biden winning, with a couple hundred more votes than originally reported. True, however, that misses the point. Recounting illegitimate votes proves nothing. The point is whether any of the votes were improper. This, the press intentionally ignored. The auditors concluded that there were numerous votes that likely were illegitimate, and therefore, “the election should not be certified.” The fake new deliberately avoided reporting that sentence.

2 – The summary is useless. The auditor should refund the payments received. They report X number of duplicate votes, Y number of votes from wrong addresses, Z number of votes by dead people, etc. What they did not say is how many of those suspicious votes were for Trump and how many for Biden. If a disproportionate number of the suspicious votes were for Biden, then Trump may have won. If a disproportionate number of the suspicious votes were for Trump, then Biden certainly won. If the suspicious votes were split proportionately (compared with the non-suspicious votes) between Biden and Trump, then Biden won. Without reporting who got the suspicious votes, this report is useless. It’s like taking your car to the repair shop because it is making a funny noise, and then getting a report that says “After conducting numerous tests, we have determined that indeed your car is making a funny noise. There may be a problem. You should have that looked at.” Idiots! You were the ones who were supposed to look at it!

 

[xerts1911]

:clap:

 

[xerts1911]

Decertification would fall on the State Legislators . Am I correct?