Maricopa County Election Audit

[TheAccountant]

You cannot be so willfully ignorant as to not notice the many times it has been pointed out that the recount included all the duplicate and "problem" ballots.
In a race with a 10k margin there are over 50k ballots that likely should not have been counted.
That and the intentional obfuscation / resistance to investigation make things look shady AF.
What I would like to know is what would the results be minus those 50k+ ballots.

I dont care who won at this point.
What many people want is to catch the cheats, prosecute them, and use those acts to justify actual election security.
If this is allowed to continue future elections will be far more meaningless than they already are.

It’s “likely” that 50k ballots should not have been counted? That’s laughable based on what they presented. Do yourself a favor and actually read the report.

 

[AZ_Five56]

https://www.instagram.com/p/CUQwh7sPGBw/

 

[xerts1911]

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/09/25/arizona-senate-draft-report-on-the-maricopa-county-election-audit-highlights-49000-questionable-votes-asks-ag-to-investigate/
Questions on 49k votes. Yeah nothing to see here

 

[sonofbp]

 

[TheAccountant]

https://www.instagram.com/p/CUQwh7sPGBw/

Using memes written by an ESL student to try to make a point makes you a mental midget. Change my mind.

 

[AZ_Five56]

https://www.instagram.com/p/CUQwh7sPGBw/

Using memes written by an ESL student to try to make a point makes you a mental midget. Change my mind.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CUA0LxQMnQ0/

 

[Cubiclerevolt]

-

You can post these FACTS all day but a certain cunt in here for some reason or other, would rather be a contrarian a**hole.

reminds me of a certain old member that posted only to argue, weaponize public personal data sites, and just run agit-prop. Some kind of monkey or something. Who knows, maybe he's just some innocent bystander

Dang. I haven't heard that name in forever. Man those were the good ole days where 9mm was flowing like milk and honey at .15 cents around.

 

[sonofbp]

: )

 

[TheAccountant]

And what did they find when they analyzed those ballots?

 

[Cubiclerevolt]

: )

Well played, well played.

 

[Suck My Glock]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUOLHrcj9I8&t=15s

 

[sonofbp]

And what did they find when they analyzed those ballots?

that the vote was far beyond the federal guidelines for allowable discrepancy and likely criminal actions were taken by those involved in the ballot handling/recording steps, hence the push for decertification and need for criminal investigations
But you knew that. Not sure if you're blackpilled AF or just here to disagree with everyone for entertainment value

 

[oldslurrydog1]

 

[SupportTheSecond]

This is a good article: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/09/its_fake_news_that_the_maricopa_audit_proves_biden_won.html

 

[TheAccountant]

And what did they find when they analyzed those ballots?

that the vote was far beyond the federal guidelines for allowable discrepancy and likely criminal actions were taken by those involved in the ballot handling/recording steps, hence the push for decertification and need for criminal investigations
But you knew that. Not sure if you're blackpilled AF or just here to disagree with everyone for entertainment value

I am disagreeing because you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what was duplicated. You’re talking about SCANNED IMAGES of ENVELOPES. I’m talking about BALLOTS. Two completely different things. So, I’ll ask again because I don’t see anything in the report: What did they find when they analyzed the BALLOTS?

Since you’re so focused on scanned images… Look at those images, look at the stray marks, and look at the date. With many of them it’s immediately obvious that it’s a duplicate scan of the same envelope. The fact there’s additional machine numbering below the name and the approval stamp leads me to believe they were scanned again intentionally, but of course they didn’t actually care to understand the process and understand what is or isn’t appropriate. Was this during some part of the signature verification process (i.e. it was rejected the first time, a person looked at it and saw a signature, and then rescanned for verification)? I don’t know and of course they didn’t do a damn thing to figure it out or explain it. The one image is very clearly a double-feed as there’s another envelope covering half of it.

In the fruit ninjas “audit” they identified a smaller section of ballots with the same name and DOB that had ballots in multiple counties. If there were duplicate ballots associated with the duplicate scanned images cast in the same county, wouldn’t that audit have detected it? I would have thought that would be a basic check that could have been done when they were searching for bamboo, but who knows.

 

[YNOTAZ]

12 lies about the audit results:

https://rumble.com/vmydr7-forensic-audit-aftermath-top-12-lies-and-truths.html

 

[action magic]

Interesting:
Liberals claim democracy at stake o...m/usa/535846-paul-gosar-trump-biden-election/

 

[Dauph]

https://mobile.twitter.com/realLizUSA/status/1442118704867667971

 

[Dauph]

:think:

https://mobile.twitter.com/WendyRogersAZ/status/1441538037586956293

 

[action magic]

...and Ice Cream Ducey refuses to decertify.