Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
kenpoprofessor said:You're right, it's 200.1 billion USD (2021), but, how much have we contributed to pay the salaries and benefits of their people instead of our own ???
Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day
Clyde
NBC_LT said:Good to hear from you Clyde & Other Forum Members-
Since the Maidan revolution in 2014, the reborn Ukrainian government has enacted a series of corruption controls/legislation to root out the remnants of the utterly degenerate practices of decades-long plundering by a legion of Putin fan-boy traitors (https://www.csis.org/analysis/corruption-and-private-sector-investment-ukraines-reconstruction). These pro-Russian Ukrainian sycophants readily exploited their own governance shortfalls and countrymen just to try to get a place at the kiddie table of Putin's oligarch feast. Putinism relies upon weak minded nativists to emulate the social contract in Russia within their own lands, specifically to disassociate their own citizens from governance in exchange for liberty from the unpopular requirements of responsible governance. The relaxation from taxation and regulation codified by the regimes spanning from Yushchenko to Poroshenko setup a revolving kleptocracy to fill the void of legislated and regulated governmental income (taxation)... those in power had to make it worthwhile for themselves.
As the dominant EU economy, Germany keeps close tabs upon the EU financial/investment sphere. A really inciteful and well-backed summary from the Institute for World Economy can be found here (https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/) about who is giving what to Ukraine and the transparency of those contributions. The working paper is a bit longer - but worth the read (https://www.ifw-kiel.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/IfW-Publications/fis-import/87bb7b0f-ed26-4240-8979-5e6601aea9e8-KWP_2218_Trebesch_et_al_Ukraine_Support_Tracker.pdf). As a student of military history, I found the comparisons of military aid spanning between other conflicts to be particularly enlightening (the fascist powers gave more to Franco in the Spanish Civil war than the west has afforded to Ukraine & we gave more to the French government as part of GDP than we currently have/are to Ukraine).
IMO there has never been a more effective investment in killing Russian combat power and embarrassing dimwit nationalists (both foreign and domestic) than the current coordinated aid structure to Ukraine. As I've mentioned previously in this forum topic, President Biden is accomplishing this at an annual investment less than President Trump paid to maintain a paltry 9,800 member combat force in Afghanistan - without remaining allies - with no chance of ever bringing a disengaged Afghan "ally" into the 21st century. Look again at the EU/NATO contribution to the Ukraine war effort cited by the IWE above, it is undeniable that President Biden has matured President Trump's stated goal to make our European allies contribute their fair share toward the defense of Europe. The defense of Europe is now centered in thwarting the expansion of Russia - the good news is that NATO member nations and EU members are ponying up their fair share - NATO membership is growing - and the hubris of the Russian tough-guy military is faltering to nerds with drones. If only Prime Minister Neville Chamberlin could have balanced this as well as President Biden and Prime Minister Johnson & Prime Minister Sunak.
kenpoprofessor said:For as intelligent as you are, it's sad to see you taking the bait that there's good in our monetary aid. The EU would have no choice but to step up if we'd stayed out of it and spent that borrowed money on our own country to improve. Instead, you think Biden is doing a good job, when the fact is, we are more destitute than ever, and our military has become a shell of what is was during the time I served. We are no longer a "world power" with Democrats at the helm, we've become a 2nd rate nation that borrows money from our enemies. What could we have done with the billions we've spent to keep "Russia at bay"? If we were that concerned about Russia, or China, we'd have spent that money on technology to make ourselves self sustaining without the need for help. But you just keep thinking that there's a "positive side" to this, there isn't. We don't have Kennedys or Reagans anymore, or any representative with a backbone to stand up and say no, we're not having it, and have actual fisticuffs in the legislature. We've become soft and malleable, beat down by the hammers of corruption and hypocrisy.
Clyde
Sen. J.D. Vance said Sunday that U.S. officials should accept the notion that Ukraine is likely to “cede some territory” in its fight against unprovoked Russian aggression.
The Ohio Republican’s remarks come as Congress weighs more aid for Ukraine, with Democrats calling for additional assistance with few if any strings attached and Republicans trying to link aid to more funding to secure the southern U.S. border.
“What’s in America’s best interest is to accept Ukraine is going to have to cede some territory to the Russians and we need to bring this war to a close,” Mr. Vance, who opposes more aid, said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “But when I think about the great human tragedy here, hundreds of thousands of Eastern Europeans innocent have been killed in this conflict, the thing that’s in our interest and in theirs is to stop the killing.”
President Biden has requested another $60 billion for Ukraine as part of a $110 billion national security package that also includes money for Israel and Taiwan.
“On the Ukraine question, in particular, everybody with a brain in their head knows this was always going to end in negotiation,” Mr. Vance said. “The idea that Ukraine was going to throw Russia back to the 1991 border was preposterous. Nobody actually believed it.”
“What we’re saying to the president, and really to the entire world, is ‘You need to articulate what the ambition is. What is $61 billion going to accomplish that $100 billion hasn’t?’” he added.
baja said:There is no stalemate.
Suck My Glock said:baja said:There is no stalemate.
If true (and it isn't), then NATO needs to strike first and right fugging now....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.