First, they took the bump stocks, and then they went after the 80% lowers. Now they're after the pistol braces, although, I know this probably isn't a surprise to anyone here.
Up until this point, the ATF has criticized specific brace models that they deemed too close to the design of a stock, and then there was the limitation to the firearms configurations where they wouldn't allow vertical foregrips to be mounted. Now they're about to drastically tighten the scope of what is a legal configuration of a pistol with a brace before it's deemed an SBR. It sounds like the new limitations could involve caliber, magazine capacity, magnified optics, bipods, and more.
This is NOT about braces. The ATF is coming after A.T.F. (All The Firearms), so I hope people fight this and stand against any new restrictions from those gun grabbers.
https://www.instagram.com/tv/CI4Lp3tl4Mv/?igshid=92n5tb9g6dpy&fbclid=IwAR3d1CMb-QJFH7zC9ti2f3lHPQWdE6O3YLEE7GmZfUKxUvWaCOs_T604a6o
Up until this point, the ATF has criticized specific brace models that they deemed too close to the design of a stock, and then there was the limitation to the firearms configurations where they wouldn't allow vertical foregrips to be mounted. Now they're about to drastically tighten the scope of what is a legal configuration of a pistol with a brace before it's deemed an SBR. It sounds like the new limitations could involve caliber, magazine capacity, magnified optics, bipods, and more.
This is NOT about braces. The ATF is coming after A.T.F. (All The Firearms), so I hope people fight this and stand against any new restrictions from those gun grabbers.
https://www.instagram.com/tv/CI4Lp3tl4Mv/?igshid=92n5tb9g6dpy&fbclid=IwAR3d1CMb-QJFH7zC9ti2f3lHPQWdE6O3YLEE7GmZfUKxUvWaCOs_T604a6o