Ballistic Therapy said:
Which is more fun to shoot?
Whichever is more accurate.
I have lot's of guns but the ones that are the funnest to shoot are the most accurate ones.
I don't care if it is a revolver or a semiautomatic.
I like shooting tight groups and I like shooting distance.
Hitting a steel plate just to hear it ring doesn't do it for me.
Hey Pardner,
I really harmonized with you on that funnest to shoot criteria. My funnest is dictated by lots of variety; the spice of life.
But I just have to respond about that ringing steel comment.
There is nothing that does it for me more than firing off a 100 yard + round and getting immediate feedback from that PING. Going to a spotting scope after a shot takes me out of my rhythm.
I've gotten so bad, I have gone to bells, and gongs trying to play a little tune. For the kids, I love to put up several pieces of overlapping steel to make a big target and watch their tiny faces light up when they hear the riddle of steel. Nothing like it to me.
Revolvers are the "funnest" for me by a lot. I've got the Colt 1911, the Browning High Power, and the XDM for new stuff. I've even got a Colt 1903 and a 1908, both by John Browning.
Those are gorgeous bottom feeders, but none of these see any serious shooting time.
Now my 32 long, 32 H&Rmag, 327fedmag, and 32-20 guns are all taken to the dance.
I'm still banging steel with my 357 Maximums and my 44's, and 45 Colts as well.
Why?
I think it's because I grew up in Texas with all my heroes being Cowboys who followed the Cowboy Way. When the Rangers went to 1911's, many Texans thought the world had come to an end.
Why?
Because wheelguns with long tubes are made for Silhouette.
Prescut