Maricopa County Election Audit

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

action magic said:
Griswold (D) moved to Washington, D.C. in 2011 and worked for President Barack Obama's 2012 campaign as a voter protection attorney. In 2013, Governor John Hickenlooper appointed her to be his liaison to the federal government.
Go figure...

Right?
 
Cubiclerevolt said:
I miss the old you where you would make posts about reformed theology. This blackpilled version of you, really saddens me.

Jack Dupp said:
I'll second that. You stopped sounding like a Jesus-follower a few years ago.

Honestly, I'm not black pilled, I'm extremely white pilled. These God hating institutions and cities are imploding. The rhetoric that you label black pilled, is an attempt to get red pilled individuals out of these sinking ships.

The more people that realize that ALL these institutions are corrupt. That the modern city has more in common with Babel, Sodom, or Gomorrah, and people need to realize that.

Beliefs have consequences, and the consequences of the centrist "Republican" dorks out there, affirming women in leadership, the globohomo agenda, the public education system, faggots in the military, etc... the consequences of those beliefs and public allowances is the society and culture we're entrenched in right now.

Move out of cities.
Move to intentionally Christian rural communities that are popping up in purple states/red counties.
Move Christians into county sheriff's offices.
Move women out of leadership positions.

Community before country.

Revolution or Revival. Those are our only two options.

Christ is king.
 
Oh, it's been 2 weeks since I posted that last comment.

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, how much has changed! How's that glue sniffing crayon eating audit doing?

People love evidence yet? When it gets to the liberal court systems, is it going anywhere? You see the CDC eviction moratorium had 3 SCOTUS justices that said the CDC had the authority to do what they did?

Your leaders hate you. Every American government institution is evil.

You think a couple audits are going to fix anything? How naive are you?

Kom1LBm.png
 
xerts1191 said:
https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2021/08/29/the-mama-bear-recall-part-3-the-fight-is-not-going-to-stop-after-the-september-14-newsom-recall-election-n434982
Mama Bears leading the fight
This is judgement from God. Men have been pussified to the point of shame.

There's no such thing as a conservative woman.

"The falling testosterone thing is very real, like where are the men exactly? Like, serious question, where are the men?"

- Tucker Carlson

Copied at timestamp-

[bbvideo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9b1znuW5Bs&t=1394s[/bbvideo]
 
weenis said:
Cubiclerevolt said:
I miss the old you where you would make posts about reformed theology. This blackpilled version of you, really saddens me.

Jack Dupp said:
I'll second that. You stopped sounding like a Jesus-follower a few years ago.

Honestly, I'm not black pilled, I'm extremely white pilled. These God hating institutions and cities are imploding. The rhetoric that you label black pilled, is an attempt to get red pilled individuals out of these sinking ships.

The more people that realize that ALL these institutions are corrupt. That the modern city has more in common with Babel, Sodom, or Gomorrah, and people need to realize that.

Beliefs have consequences, and the consequences of the centrist "Republican" dorks out there, affirming women in leadership, the globohomo agenda, the public education system, faggots in the military, etc... the consequences of those beliefs and public allowances is the society and culture we're entrenched in right now.

Move out of cities.
Move to intentionally Christian rural communities that are popping up in purple states/red counties.
Move Christians into county sheriff's offices.
Move women out of leadership positions.

Community before country.

Revolution or Revival. Those are our only two options.

Christ is king.

This made my day. You know the part in the two towers and at Helms Deep where the army of Rohan is about to be overrun routed And Gandalf shows up and breaks a foot off in the orcs asses?

This is similar to how this post makes me feel.

Not only is this based AF. It's a real plan rooted in truth. Aside from repentance and a Christ centered life, there will be no restoration.

That is an interesting point you bring up about women in leadership positions as progressive christians will point to the diversity to the gospel but will ignore the fact that when things have gotten so bad God uses women in leadership as a bellwether on coming judgement of his people.

Great points and thanks for the clarification.
 
weenis said:
Cubiclerevolt said:
I miss the old you where you would make posts about reformed theology. This blackpilled version of you, really saddens me.

Jack Dupp said:
I'll second that. You stopped sounding like a Jesus-follower a few years ago.

Honestly, I'm not black pilled, I'm extremely white pilled. These God hating institutions and cities are imploding. The rhetoric that you label black pilled, is an attempt to get red pilled individuals out of these sinking ships.

The more people that realize that ALL these institutions are corrupt. That the modern city has more in common with Babel, Sodom, or Gomorrah, and people need to realize that.

Beliefs have consequences, and the consequences of the centrist "Republican" dorks out there, affirming women in leadership, the globohomo agenda, the public education system, faggots in the military, etc... the consequences of those beliefs and public allowances is the society and culture we're entrenched in right now.

Move out of cities.
Move to intentionally Christian rural communities that are popping up in purple states/red counties.
Move Christians into county sheriff's offices.
Move women out of leadership positions.

Community before country.

Revolution or Revival. Those are our only two options.

Christ is king.

That's more like it!
 
weenis said:
Move out of cities.
Move to intentionally Christian rural communities that are popping up in purple states/red counties.
Move Christians into county sheriff's offices.
Move women out of leadership positions.

Just wondering... what's your justification for moving women out of any leadership positions?

I'm all about good people stepping up into leadership roles such as the sheriff's offices as you mentioned, but I'm not sure that moving out of the cities into rural Christian communities is what the Bible instructs Christians to do.
 
AZ_Five56 said:
weenis said:
Move out of cities.
Move to intentionally Christian rural communities that are popping up in purple states/red counties.
Move Christians into county sheriff's offices.
Move women out of leadership positions.

Just wondering... what's your justification for moving women out of any leadership positions?

Throughout all of scripture, the only time women are in leadership positions is when God's people, namely men, are under judgement. It's also modeled in church leadership as well, with the qualifications of elder and deacon.

This isn't strictly a Biblical concept, here's Ayn Rand-

Now consider the meaning of the Presidency: in all his professional relationships, within the entire sphere of his work, the President is the highest authority; he is the "Chief Executive," the "Commander-in-Chief." Even in a fully free country, with an unbreached constitutional division of powers, a President is the final authority who sets the terms, the goals, the policies of every job in the executive branch of the government. In the performance of his duties, a President does not deal with equals, but only with inferiors (not inferiors as persons, but in respect to the hierarchy of their positions, their work and their responsibilities).
This, for a rational woman, would be an unbearable situation. (And if she is not rational, she is unfit for Presidency or for any important position, anyway.) To act as the superior, the leader, virtually the ruler of all the men she deals with, would be an excruciating psychological torture. It would require total depersonalization, an utter selflessness and an impersonal aspect of her own character and attitude; she could not be herself, i.e., a woman; she would have to function only as a mind, not as a person, i.e., as a thinker devoid of personal values-a dangerously artificial dichotomy which no one could sustain for long. By the nature of her duties and daily activities, she would become the most unfeminine, sexless, metaphysically inappropriate and rationally revolting figure of all: a matriarch.
It is conceivable that in some unusual historical context, in some period of extreme national emergency, it would be proper for a woman temporarily to assume the leadership of a country, in the role of President, if there were no men able to assume it. But what would this imply about the character of the men of that time?

As a society, we've completely lost focus of the distinctions between male and female. To the point that schools are putting litter boxes into children's bathrooms because kids think that they are genderfluid cats.

Men are created and designed for public life and engaging in the square. Whether it's a war of economics, or with a sword, that's the position of a man. Women are man's helper, tending to the home, caring for children, and her husband.

AZ_Five56 said:
I'm all about good people stepping up into leadership roles such as the sheriff's offices as you mentioned, but I'm not sure that moving out of the cities into rural Christian communities is what the Bible instructs Christians to do.

The cities are lost. It's nearly impossible for Christians born in the city to flourish in ways that they can outside. We've been brainwashed into chasing a house, a car, and a career.

Lot's choice to live in the city was destructive for his family. Yes, he is in the hall of faith, but I believe there is wisdom in learning from his mistakes.

Cities impose higher taxes, those tax dollars support fundamentally anti-Christ activities to a level not comparable when living rural.

The danger to your family is increased in the city.

Those in the city are oftentimes a slave to the city, they MUST be in the city, whether it's lifestyle choices, debt, jobs, college, etc. We can't serve two masters.

The conclusions Tim Keller reached in "City Church" are completely backward. We shouldn't be doubling down on the city, we should be forming Christian communities to send missionaries into the city.

It's almost getting to the point where it's going to be impossible to live in the city and not be surrounded by actual legitimate pornographic enactments. That's something a Christian should strongly think over, whether that's appropriate to surround yourself or your family in.

Christians are to be fruitful and multiply. Men should marry young, have kids young, raise them in a Christian household, for them to be kings.

But what do city people have? They raise their kids in the city, sending those same kids to public school, to rub shoulder to shoulders with genderfluid fox queer, and then those same Christian parents are scratching their heads wondering how their precious "salt and light" Johnny went wrong.

Strategically, I see city living and city life as arguing with a flat earther. Christian family growth is going to be a constant debate against your immediate surroundings that are forcing their arguments on you. Your continued living in the city and trying to live biblically is a counter argument. The city doesn't care about your counter argument.

It's like debating a flat earther. Don't debate flat earthers. Don't try and make Babel into something it's not.

I encourage everyone to watch this series on Amazon - https://www.amazon.com/Man-Rampant/dp/B07Z8G12XP?tag=azs08d-20

Here's a trailer-

[bbvideo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxJpvLri7cw[/bbvideo]
 
AZ_Five56 said:
Just wondering... what's your justification for moving women out of any leadership positions?

While it is just one users opinion, I can see why he said that.

I have seen plenty of women in leadership positions throughout my career, and while most were competent, I have seen many make decisions based on emotion, more so than men in similar roles.

Sometimes this is detrimental, even dangerous.
 
Weenis is making me begin to doubt that the office of prophet was permanently vacated at the end of the apostolic age.

I swear the only ones leading the fight in saving, rebuking and restoring the church at this point are the reformists. I am legitimately encouraged and inspired with someone actually having a plan and acting on it.
 
cool arrow said:
While it is just one users opinion, I can see why he said that.

I have seen plenty of women in leadership positions throughout my career, and while most were competent, I have seen many make decisions based on emotion, more so than men in similar roles.

Sometimes this is detrimental, even dangerous.

The fact that they make decisions based on emotion proves incompetence in and of itself.

I've had 3 women for bosses and 2 were incompetent and interested in nothing more than furthering themselves and their careers at the expense of those who worked under them. The third was the opposite and a great boss.
 
weenis said:
Oh, it's been 2 weeks since I posted that last comment.

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, how much has changed! How's that glue sniffing crayon eating audit doing?

People love evidence yet? When it gets to the liberal court systems, is it going anywhere? You see the CDC eviction moratorium had 3 SCOTUS justices that said the CDC had the authority to do what they did?

Your leaders hate you. Every American government institution is evil.

You think a couple audits are going to fix anything? How naive are you?

Kom1LBm.png

It has to get to court both dem judges and rep judges have weighed in previously. No way this will settled with links, only rulings. The court record is not good so far. Kepping all money in my pocket that is what their auditing, how much they can collect for some folks legal defense funds is just a guess.
 
Manitu said:
It has to get to court both dem judges and rep judges have weighed in previously. No way this will settled with links, only rulings. The court record is not good so far. Kepping all money in my pocket that is what their auditing, how much they can collect for some folks legal defense funds is just a guess.
What if I told you that even the republican judges were liberal?

You're on your own dude.

Everyone in the government hates you.
 
weenis said:
Manitu said:
It has to get to court both dem judges and rep judges have weighed in previously. No way this will settled with links, only rulings. The court record is not good so far. Kepping all money in my pocket that is what their auditing, how much they can collect for some folks legal defense funds is just a guess.
What if I told you that even the republican judges were liberal?

You're on your own dude.

Everyone in the government hates you.

If anyone needs to look to who is going to deliver them from their current situation they need to only do two simple things.

1. Find a mirror.

2. Read the bible daily. Meditate on it and put it into action. (I'm a bit biased to ESV but thats me.)
 
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/heather-mullins-massive-dropbox-stuffing-scandal-data-ga-az-wi-several-states-average-leftist-operative-hit-23-ballot-dropboxes-night-video/
Busy little commies doing late night ballot drops, idiots forgot cameras posted everywhere now, smile for the camera!
 
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/084/102/792/original/6c4c80b117fd722c.mp4
 
weenis said:
AZ_Five56 said:
weenis said:
Move out of cities.
Move to intentionally Christian rural communities that are popping up in purple states/red counties.
Move Christians into county sheriff's offices.
Move women out of leadership positions.

Just wondering... what's your justification for moving women out of any leadership positions?

Throughout all of scripture, the only time women are in leadership positions is when God's people, namely men, are under judgement. It's also modeled in church leadership as well, with the qualifications of elder and deacon.

This isn't strictly a Biblical concept, here's Ayn Rand-

Now consider the meaning of the Presidency: in all his professional relationships, within the entire sphere of his work, the President is the highest authority; he is the "Chief Executive," the "Commander-in-Chief." Even in a fully free country, with an unbreached constitutional division of powers, a President is the final authority who sets the terms, the goals, the policies of every job in the executive branch of the government. In the performance of his duties, a President does not deal with equals, but only with inferiors (not inferiors as persons, but in respect to the hierarchy of their positions, their work and their responsibilities).
This, for a rational woman, would be an unbearable situation. (And if she is not rational, she is unfit for Presidency or for any important position, anyway.) To act as the superior, the leader, virtually the ruler of all the men she deals with, would be an excruciating psychological torture. It would require total depersonalization, an utter selflessness and an impersonal aspect of her own character and attitude; she could not be herself, i.e., a woman; she would have to function only as a mind, not as a person, i.e., as a thinker devoid of personal values-a dangerously artificial dichotomy which no one could sustain for long. By the nature of her duties and daily activities, she would become the most unfeminine, sexless, metaphysically inappropriate and rationally revolting figure of all: a matriarch.
It is conceivable that in some unusual historical context, in some period of extreme national emergency, it would be proper for a woman temporarily to assume the leadership of a country, in the role of President, if there were no men able to assume it. But what would this imply about the character of the men of that time?

As a society, we've completely lost focus of the distinctions between male and female. To the point that schools are putting litter boxes into children's bathrooms because kids think that they are genderfluid cats.

Men are created and designed for public life and engaging in the square. Whether it's a war of economics, or with a sword, that's the position of a man. Women are man's helper, tending to the home, caring for children, and her husband.

AZ_Five56 said:
I'm all about good people stepping up into leadership roles such as the sheriff's offices as you mentioned, but I'm not sure that moving out of the cities into rural Christian communities is what the Bible instructs Christians to do.

The cities are lost. It's nearly impossible for Christians born in the city to flourish in ways that they can outside. We've been brainwashed into chasing a house, a car, and a career.

Lot's choice to live in the city was destructive for his family. Yes, he is in the hall of faith, but I believe there is wisdom in learning from his mistakes.

Cities impose higher taxes, those tax dollars support fundamentally anti-Christ activities to a level not comparable when living rural.

The danger to your family is increased in the city.

Those in the city are oftentimes a slave to the city, they MUST be in the city, whether it's lifestyle choices, debt, jobs, college, etc. We can't serve two masters.

The conclusions Tim Keller reached in "City Church" are completely backward. We shouldn't be doubling down on the city, we should be forming Christian communities to send missionaries into the city.

It's almost getting to the point where it's going to be impossible to live in the city and not be surrounded by actual legitimate pornographic enactments. That's something a Christian should strongly think over, whether that's appropriate to surround yourself or your family in.

Christians are to be fruitful and multiply. Men should marry young, have kids young, raise them in a Christian household, for them to be kings.

But what do city people have? They raise their kids in the city, sending those same kids to public school, to rub shoulder to shoulders with genderfluid fox queer, and then those same Christian parents are scratching their heads wondering how their precious "salt and light" Johnny went wrong.

Strategically, I see city living and city life as arguing with a flat earther. Christian family growth is going to be a constant debate against your immediate surroundings that are forcing their arguments on you. Your continued living in the city and trying to live biblically is a counter argument. The city doesn't care about your counter argument.

It's like debating a flat earther. Don't debate flat earthers. Don't try and make Babel into something it's not.

I encourage everyone to watch this series on Amazon - https://www.amazon.com/Man-Rampant/dp/B07Z8G12XP?tag=azs08d-20

Here's a trailer-

[bbvideo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxJpvLri7cw[/bbvideo]



Damn dude, that reads like the Taliban wrote it.

I'm a non theist, your condemnation doesn't offend me, but it puts our values in different categories. You would like a Theocracy, and I would fight it to the death to defend the very essence of my constitutionally enumerated rights.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde
 
kenpoprofessor said:
Damn dude, that reads like the Taliban wrote it.

I'm a non theist, your condemnation doesn't offend me, but it puts our values in different categories. You would like a Theocracy, and I would fight it to the death to defend the very essence of my constitutionally enumerated rights.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

No, we don't. We simply want the autonomy and freedom to form communities that we wish to live in peace and govern how we see fit. Anyone is free to go. His advice or idea only affects those who are in the body of believers.

The constitution is fine on it's own, and should be the law of the land. The problem is that it is ignored or there are limits placed on the citizens instead of the government as it was intended.

The only theocracy that will get it right is when Christ returns to establish his kingdom.
 
Back
Top