Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doc Holliday said:So no more Open Carry Cops in the stores, either.....right, Walmart? RIGHT?
I mean, Open Carry is Open Carry, regardless of who is doing it.
...oh, and by the way...I wouldn't have signed jack sh*t for Walmart...
Doc Holliday said:So no more Open Carry Cops in the stores, either.....right, Walmart? RIGHT?
I mean, Open Carry is Open Carry, regardless of who is doing it.
...oh, and by the way...I wouldn't have signed jack sh*t for Walmart...
Ballistic Therapy said:Doc Holliday said:So no more Open Carry Cops in the stores, either.....right, Walmart? RIGHT?
I mean, Open Carry is Open Carry, regardless of who is doing it.
...oh, and by the way...I wouldn't have signed jack sh*t for Walmart...
It was probably "sign this or be arrested for trespassing ."
Are they now going to put posters of this guy up in every Walmart so they can identify him in case he comes in ?
More than likely if he is caught in another Walmart they will arrest him for trespassing.
338lapua said:Doc Holliday said:So no more Open Carry Cops in the stores, either.....right, Walmart? RIGHT?
I mean, Open Carry is Open Carry, regardless of who is doing it.
...oh, and by the way...I wouldn't have signed jack sh*t for Walmart...
Rules have never applied to cops, they are special people.
Wouldn't signing that paper saying he is banned from all walmarts be enough to have him arrested for trespassing the next time he enters one ?Doc Holliday said:Ballistic Therapy said:Doc Holliday said:So no more Open Carry Cops in the stores, either.....right, Walmart? RIGHT?
I mean, Open Carry is Open Carry, regardless of who is doing it.
...oh, and by the way...I wouldn't have signed jack sh*t for Walmart...
It was probably "sign this or be arrested for trespassing ."
Are they now going to put posters of this guy up in every Walmart so they can identify him in case he comes in ?
More than likely if he is caught in another Walmart they will arrest him for trespassing.
Someone, or some business, asks you to leave and you leave, you can't be arrested for trespass.
If he comes back, all he has to do is swipe his credit card (with his name on it) and the system will alert that he is at a register. THEN he can be arrested, since he came back.
redj said:Wouldn't signing that paper saying he is banned from all walmarts be enough to have him arrested for trespassing the next time he enters one ?Doc Holliday said:Ballistic Therapy said:It was probably "sign this or be arrested for trespassing ."
Are they now going to put posters of this guy up in every Walmart so they can identify him in case he comes in ?
More than likely if he is caught in another Walmart they will arrest him for trespassing.
Someone, or some business, asks you to leave and you leave, you can't be arrested for trespass.
If he comes back, all he has to do is swipe his credit card (with his name on it) and the system will alert that he is at a register. THEN he can be arrested, since he came back.
Tacticalplinker said:If he comes back, all he has to do is swipe his credit card (with his name on it) and the system will alert that he is at a register.
I call bullshit on that. What if my name is John Smith and they banned some guy from their stores with the name John Smith? They would have to have some form of unique identifier for that customer and their credit card, and even a middle name would draw too many false positives. What if they use a different card? What if their old card expires? The examples are endless. Their non-self check out registers are stuck in the 1990's and I highly doubt they have the capability for this anyway. What if the customer just uses cash? Then all of the technology is meaningless.
shooter444 said:Yah, I tend to agree, Knockonit,... I don't believe a business can unilaterally "BAN" a citizen's travel without legal action.
I'm sure there are many that do, and, many that get away with it,.... but if push came to shove, my guess is, there has to be a court order.
But, I am not a legal scholar. :shock:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.