Latest Actions by Biden's KGB Against Gun Owners

[kenpoprofessor]

It's being pragmatic.

There's a whole thread dedicated to NFA items. I am sure I can go walk in there and find the same names posting here as well as in there. Are those people any less 2A supportive?

Does arguing over who's name looks better written in piss in the snow help anyone?

I haven't been paying attention to any of this because they are going to do what they want to do.

I have 2 choices if I was in this camp. The same 2 that you all have.

1. Comply.
2. Not Comply.

Like Clyde said, simply writing to them enables them to know where you stand.

Why yes, it does, I'll be relieved and everyone will know I'm literate.

Most likely, the same folks who "didn't like bump stocks", and were OK with them "redefining" what they were, are the same as these folks. Personally, I would consider anyone who simply goes along with this idea as a collaborator who has no use when arguing the 2A.


Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

 

[Cubiclerevolt]

^ I definitely wasn't in that camp. Didn't like them, thought they were a goofball gimmick thing. If people wanted to buy them, they should be able to and they surely aren't classified as a "mAcHiNe GuN". Hell in that case remove all thumbs and belt loops.

You know me man, if you can park it in your driveway or in your garage you should be able to own it.

 

[knockonit]

lol, big issue is not who or what its who believes in the 2A rights, and how far are they willing to go to protect it, problem with most sites like this and its members, imo is, while most are ''gun guys, owners ect'' , most will not take the time to review and or get involved in any thing remotely controvercial in regards to ''rights'' in general. They hope someone else will pick up the baton and move it forward, and while they cheer but do nothing else, whether monetary support, or chasing down politicians to confront and discuss, hell even throwing a few bucks to the local group AZCDL, i'd venture to say less than 5% of the folks on this site are even members, and since the ''nra'' is no longer a threat, locally we will have to fend for ourselves,
of course all of this is speculation on my part, but one can tell by discussion and the numbers the rights group post, its a dismal percentage for sure,
i know will get some flack, and its okay, cause fair weather folks are like that. just saying
Rj, and today i don't give a shiat.

 

[kenpoprofessor]

lol, big issue is not who or what its who believes in the 2A rights, and how far are they willing to go to protect it, problem with most sites like this and its members, imo is, while most are ''gun guys, owners ect'' , most will not take the time to review and or get involved in any thing remotely controvercial in regards to ''rights'' in general. They hope someone else will pick up the baton and move it forward, and while they cheer but do nothing else, whether monetary support, or chasing down politicians to confront and discuss, hell even throwing a few bucks to the local group AZCDL, i'd venture to say less than 5% of the folks on this site are even members, and since the ''nra'' is no longer a threat, locally we will have to fend for ourselves,
of course all of this is speculation on my part, but one can tell by discussion and the numbers the rights group post, its a dismal percentage for sure,
i know will get some flack, and its okay, cause fair weather folks are like that. just saying
Rj, and today i don't give a shiat.

90% of the "gun owners" I talk to have never heard of the AZCDL, and for that, they should be ashamed to call themselves anything but a "casual" gun owner. It's always easier to ride the coat tails to victory while doing nothing.


Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

 

[XJThrottle]

I have stamps for SBRs because I think pistol braces are about as cool as cum on a mustache, and I wanted a short barreled ARs. The stamp is my only option.

You want a short barreled AR and are OK with a brace, have at it....IMO.

Bump stocks are range toys. Have it too if you want. Too bad most are just collecting dust on someone's top closet shelf right now..
Neither should be subject to the BS that we currently have to go through for SBRs.

 

[kenpoprofessor]

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

 

[YNOTAZ]

90% of the "gun owners" I talk to have never heard of the AZCDL, and for that, they should be ashamed to call themselves anything but a "casual" gun owner. It's always easier to ride the coat tails to victory while doing nothing.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

Hence the term FUDD

 

[TheAccountant]

Pay a fee, submit fingerprints and forms, take a class, and have your personal information entered into a database to get your CCW and you’re a “real” gun owner. Pay a fee and submit fingerprints and forms for a SBR and you’re a “collaborator” or “fudd.” Makes sense.

 

[kenpoprofessor]

Pay a fee, submit fingerprints and forms, take a class, and have your personal information entered into a database to get your CCW and you’re a “real” gun owner. Pay a fee and submit fingerprints and forms for a SBR and you’re a “collaborator” or “fudd.” Makes sense.

Ah, I was wondering when our local Democrat would pop in.


Clyde

 

[kenpoprofessor]

He's content in feeling there is nothing that can be done so just leave him alone to roll over on his back and see if the ATF scratches his tummy or cuts his balls off.

Or maybe, he gets lucky and the ATF just shortens the chain a couple more links until next time.

Damn, how did I miss this post?? Well said sir, well said, truth is a bitter, jagged pill to swallow.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

 

[XJThrottle]

Pay a fee, submit fingerprints and forms, take a class, and have your personal information entered into a database to get your CCW and you’re a “real” gun owner. Pay a fee and submit fingerprints and forms for a SBR and you’re a “collaborator” or “fudd.” Makes sense.

Ah, I was wondering when our local Democrat would pop in.


Clyde

Is there a flaw to his logic in regards to this post? Don't recall anyone getting bashed for getting a CCW/CWP. It's typically promoted. Concealed carry is a constitutional right WITHOUT all the steps, yet are praised by getting the check mark from the man. What's the difference here?

 

[kenpoprofessor]

Pay a fee, submit fingerprints and forms, take a class, and have your personal information entered into a database to get your CCW and you’re a “real” gun owner. Pay a fee and submit fingerprints and forms for a SBR and you’re a “collaborator” or “fudd.” Makes sense.

Ah, I was wondering when our local Democrat would pop in.


Clyde

Is there a flaw to his logic in regards to this post? Don't recall anyone getting bashed for getting a CCW/CWP. It's typically promoted. Concealed carry is a constitutional right WITHOUT all the steps, yet are praised by getting the check mark from the man. What's the difference here?

Well, I'm just gonna let you guys figure this out, or, even guess what a huge difference there is. If you want it to be the same, well, god bless your lttle pea pickin' heart.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

 

[YNOTAZ]

Is there a flaw to his logic in regards to this post? Don't recall anyone getting bashed for getting a CCW/CWP. It's typically promoted. Concealed carry is a constitutional right WITHOUT all the steps, yet are praised by getting the check mark from the man. What's the difference here?

Just my opinion BUT HELL YEAH.

Our entire landscape is tipped left to the falling off point and they are asking for compromise and common-sense gun control.
Fist bump stocks, then arm braces, then binary triggers, then anything that “enhances the fire rate of a firearm, then “high-capacity magazines”, then “assault weapons”, do we at least write in and exhibit our resistance or do we wait until another 1776 is the only method to get back where we should be today.

Oh yeah and pay a $200 fee so we can stay in our own state, unless we have papers.

Yep, let's roll over now and hope they scratch our tummies and not cut out balls off.

That's what wrong with the post.

 

[XJThrottle]

I wasn't saying it's OK that it is done. Just how is it different?

Why is it OK paying for a class to get a signature, spend another $60+ to send off a document with all your info and finger prints, to get a license you don't need in the first place to do what it implies.

But, not OK (you're giving into the man) to spend a similar amount of money overall, to essentially send out all the same info to get a license (tax) for something that you feel shouldn't be required....but is.


One man, voluntarily paying for something that is free.
The other man, voluntarily paying for something that should be free...but isn't.

Are they both fools?

 

[kenpoprofessor]

Much cognitive dissonance is the norm for them apparently.

Clyde

 

[jls in az]

Hopefully, we can get a NFA case before the Supreme Court while it still has a conservative majority. The NFA was held as Constitutional in the 1930's because it didn't affect "military style" firearms that were suitable for "militias" at the time. Remember, at the time NFA was challenged, the K98, Springfield 03A3 and SMLE were the top of the line for the world's militaries. The US military, and most other countries, didn't use short-barreled rifles, SMG's, SBS's, fully automatic rifles, or silencers, only bolt action rifles. I doubt the same thing could be said in court today.

 

[TheAccountant]

Is there a flaw to his logic in regards to this post? Don't recall anyone getting bashed for getting a CCW/CWP. It's typically promoted. Concealed carry is a constitutional right WITHOUT all the steps, yet are praised by getting the check mark from the man. What's the difference here?

Just my opinion BUT HELL YEAH.

Our entire landscape is tipped left to the falling off point and they are asking for compromise and common-sense gun control.
Fist bump stocks, then arm braces, then binary triggers, then anything that “enhances the fire rate of a firearm, then “high-capacity magazines”, then “assault weapons”, do we at least write in and exhibit our resistance or do we wait until another 1776 is the only method to get back where we should be today.

Oh yeah and pay a $200 fee so we can stay in our own state, unless we have papers.

Yep, let's roll over now and hope they scratch our tummies and not cut out balls off.

That's what wrong with the post.

I think you read the wrong post.

 

[YNOTAZ]

I think you read the wrong post.

Nope he asked if there was a flaw to AZ11----'s logic and I responded. I could have been overtly sarcastic and said, what logic but I said: rolling over and doing nothing because you will likely loose insures that you will loose.

But I'm on AZ---'s ignore list because snowflakes can't handle contrary opinion whether they are right or wrong. Their narcissism demands that they be right ergo, ignore.

 

[YNOTAZ]

For all of the Non-Fudds, if you are in terested:

https://www.firearmspolicy.org/save-the-braces?utm_campaign=608_atf3&utm_medium=email&utm_source=firearmspolicycoalition

 

[oldslurrydog1]

Entertaining thread for sure, but I think that XJThrottle has a point.