Kari Lake to run for Governor

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Welcome! You have been invited by AZPLINKER to join our community. Please click here to register.
Oh well, Hobbs is out again. If she's too stupid to stand up to her competition how will she stand up to other governors looking for a piece of the pie?
.
.

Screenshot 2022-09-12 190222.jpg
 
https://twitter.com/AZBrianAnderson/status/1569066736825290753?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1569066736825290753%7Ctwgr%5E08fc6b89d07a971e62b8aefbef2b1253bb9962cf%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fchuck-todd-kari-lake-looks-strong%2F
 
Dauph said:
https://twitter.com/DrewHLive/status/1563695765326688257?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1563695765326688257%7Ctwgr%5E3a8ff15c585753280649f756e9e95e3bd4bc44ef%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fdrew-hernandez-blows-up-katie-hobbs-event-in-arizona%2F

Great way to get hit in the mouth. Quit putting hands on people.
 
Shocker, both the Santa Cruz and Pima County Sheriffs are open border Demo-Socio-Fascists. Probably why we don't have more illegal alien buses from Arizona to DC and Chicago. Bolshevek lemmings - "I'm really backing Hobbs to cover my pension a$$." - bagadouchesssssss

https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2022/08/31/katie-hobbs-new-border-hawk-ad-open-border-sheriffs/

🤨
61TvFYVWILL._AC_SL1069_.jpg
 
https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1572312882523836416?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1572312882523836416%7Ctwgr%5E6c2d3e46e39099fe79372148464b3dc5abbe551f%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fkatie-hobbs-hopes-no-one-finds-out%2F
 
Dauph said:
https://youtu.be/iPrnSH-8buQ

I laugh at the ASSstronaut's campaign message that he's the son of two cops, but he grew up poor. :o :o :o Shit, he was high middle class with two working parents. I had one parent, father died when I was 1yo, he has no idea the struggle.


Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde
 
Man if she doesnt win :(

Only thing is .. my wife works in a place that is chock full of Liberals. They all say Kari Lake is "NUTS"

I dont know where the nuts thing comes from but I think that anyone who challenged the presidential election results is considered crazy. Been saying it for years now. We will come to miss Doug. AZ is a chang'in and I hope we have enough conservatives left to keep it on the "Right" side of politics for at least 10 more years ... my projected life expectancy.
 
Nobody has come up with anything to move the election shit beyond theory, many of them pretty wacky theories. Look at what’s come out about the fruit ninja after the fiasco/money grab that happened here in AZ. Most are tired of the whining and crying about the 2020 election and are looking for someone to deal with the very real problems affecting households on a daily basis: record inflation, out of control crime, open borders, a looming recession, etc.

Conservative policies are the best to deal with each of those, so if she stays on point then she’ll likely win. If she panders to the edge of her base/Trump with all of the retarded election shit then she probably loses.
 
The only thing "retarded" is an individual's inability to look at the mounds of available evidence and not think, at least, hmmm the 2020 election does look like the possibility of fraud or maladministration could exist.

Go Kari Go.
 
baja said:
The only thing "retarded" is an individual's inability to look at the mounds of available evidence and not think, at least, hmmm the 2020 election does look like the possibility of fraud or maladministration could exist.

Go Kari Go.

When the A-Hole attorney general says he won't pursue it, the opposition says, see conspiracy theory.

Screw him and the rest of the political machine red or blue. USA & ARIZONA FIRST

Go Kari.....
 
baja said:
The only thing "retarded" is an individual's inability to look at the mounds of available evidence and not think, at least, hmmm the 2020 election does look like the possibility of fraud or maladministration could exist.

Go Kari Go.

“Look like”, “possibility”, and “could exist” aren’t convincing to anyone unless they’re looking for a reason to be convinced. Possibilities and appearances aren’t evidence in my book, but hey, don’t forget to make your donation to the people pushing it. Nevermind that Trump himself did nothing with the $250M of funds raised under the guise of contesting the 2020 election… well, unless you count redirecting those funds to a separate PAC as “doing something.”
 
I used those terms so even someone 'slow' would stop and think.
You failed.
 
TheAccountant said:
“Look like”, “possibility”, and “could exist” aren’t convincing to anyone......"

And Hunter Biden's notebook is Russian collusion because a corrupt law enforcement agency decides to bury it, and Hillary didn't commit a crime by having a mail server in her bathroom with confidential information on it and never lied to the FBI, and FISA warrants based on demonstrably false information are legal, and $3.3 million dollars from the national archives to move Obama records, containing confidential data, out of an unsecured warehouse in an Ill suburb is all good

We can trust the crap they feed us because they are our government.

Yep, if they didn't go after voter fraud, there must not have been any.
 
baja said:
I used those terms so even someone 'slow' would stop and think.
You failed.

Failed at jumping to conclusions not based on fact?

Was there fraud? Sure.

What matters is if you can prove that there was enough fraud that changed the outcome of the election. Everything that has been put forth to date, even by the Cyber Ninjas own admission, was there was NOT enough fraud that actually effected the election results.

Simply put, even if you take out all the identifiable fraudulent votes, Trump still lost.

If you want to change minds, show the evidence that the fraud actually affected the outcome. Nobody has done so. If you can show the actual evidence, we’d agree with you that Trump won.

What we have evidence of is that there were people in Trumps own party that wanted him out and actively campaigned against him. When you loose significant portions of your own party, it’s pretty much impossible to win.
 
baja said:
I used those terms so even someone 'slow' would stop and think.
You failed.

Whatever your alleged intention, the terms you used accurately describe what’s been put forth - far from “mounds of evidence.” Keep being a sheep and thinking you’re the smartest person in the room. It makes for a good laugh.

Joe_Blacke said:
baja said:
I used those terms so even someone 'slow' would stop and think.
You failed.

Failed at jumping to conclusions not based on fact?

Was there fraud? Sure.

What matters is if you can prove that there was enough fraud that changed the outcome of the election. Everything that has been put forth to date, even by the Cyber Ninjas own admission, was there was NOT enough fraud that actually effected the election results.

Simply put, even if you take out all the identifiable fraudulent votes, Trump still lost.

If you want to change minds, show the evidence that the fraud actually affected the outcome. Nobody has done so. If you can show the actual evidence, we’d agree with you that Trump won.

What we have evidence of is that there were people in Trumps own party that wanted him out and actively campaigned against him. When you loose significant portions of your own party, it’s pretty much impossible to win.

Exactly. Nice to see someone on this board actually gets it.

If Trump would have run on policy he would have won in a landslide. The Dems played him like a fiddle and his own ego beat him.
 
Back
Top