hudsguns
Member
TheAccountant said:hudsguns said:TheAccountant said:Explain how receiving 34% of the vote in a two-candidate race puts one candidate ahead.
You finally got something right - I drastically overstated your intelligence by comparing you to a potato.
34% doesn't start out with an advantage over Dems then just need to persuade a few of the non-party voters.
AZ GOP had good candidates, but the minimal thinkers voted them out during primary. Now those same voters can't believe what's happening. Rather than blame some machines, media, weather, people moving from other states, or just the complaint of moment, take a look at the candidates, most likely the loss is due to a bad candidates.
The Trumpicans (e.g. Lake, Masters, Finchem, Hamadeh) are beyond bad they're pathetic candidates.
Since your so smart you should have seen the numbers from primary showed that Lake would need ~70% of the voters for Taylor Robson, if you didn't, I think we might have overstated your intelligence.
Oh well, maybe next time.
Oh, so it’s not “just voting by party” that puts the candidate ahead? Good to know, considering that’s not what you said originally. Before casting judgment on my intelligence, maybe you should repeat 1st grade and learn the difference between “your” and “you’re.”
I attend an AZ public school, I've always had an issue with proof reading, I find the bugs during compile & run.
Don't matter the whole point is you now understand the intent. Simple good candidates get votes, bad candidates don't.
Anyone that thought the AZ Trumpicans were going to win, took out some long shot odds. Dems didn't have to really do anything just let the Trumpicans babble on enough to burn the bridges.
Also, my casting judgment on your intelligence pales in comparison to your very witty remarks.