Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to changes made to A.R.S. 13-3112
(link is external)
during the 2010 and 2011 legislative sessions, effective July 20, 2011, the Concealed Weapons Permit Unit will no longer approve or renew concealed weapons training programs, training organizations, or firearms-safety instructors.
Amendments to A.R.S. 13-3112
(link is external)
in 2010 added a number of new ways in which an applicant could qualify for a concealed weapons permit through training or experience. These new additions removed the statutory minimum requirements which the Unit used to evaluate and approve training programs. Since there are no statutorily defined minimum requirements, the ability of DPS to evaluate, approve and support training programs has been greatly diminished. For this reason, after July 20, 2011, the Concealed Weapons Permit Unit will no longer update, support or sanction the use of the proprietary firearms-safety training course previously used to train permit holders. Furthermore, DPS will no longer review or approve any lesson plans and will no longer publish or update the “Legal Issues Relating to the Use of Deadly Force” guideline.
smithers599 said:https://www.azdps.gov/services/public/cwp
Due to changes made to A.R.S. 13-3112
(link is external)
during the 2010 and 2011 legislative sessions, effective July 20, 2011, the Concealed Weapons Permit Unit will no longer approve or renew concealed weapons training programs, training organizations, or firearms-safety instructors.
Amendments to A.R.S. 13-3112
(link is external)
in 2010 added a number of new ways in which an applicant could qualify for a concealed weapons permit through training or experience. These new additions removed the statutory minimum requirements which the Unit used to evaluate and approve training programs. Since there are no statutorily defined minimum requirements, the ability of DPS to evaluate, approve and support training programs has been greatly diminished. For this reason, after July 20, 2011, the Concealed Weapons Permit Unit will no longer update, support or sanction the use of the proprietary firearms-safety training course previously used to train permit holders. Furthermore, DPS will no longer review or approve any lesson plans and will no longer publish or update the “Legal Issues Relating to the Use of Deadly Force” guideline.
In the past, I always used the Mike Anthony outline, but apparently that is not required any more. Still probably a good place to start.
Pro2a said:I'm not asking a political or moral question.
Its about the content required, if any, to be presented to the CCW applicant.
If nothing is mandated by the state, then I can make up my own guidelines that contain a variety of self defense topics, as well as the AZ laws pertaining to deadly force, justification..blah blah blah
Arizona State Rifle & Pistol Association (“ASRPA”)
DEFENSIVE FIREARMS USE IN ARIZONA - LEGAL GUIDE
By Michael P. Anthony
(Version 15.9 - August, 2016)
(Five Rules for Carrying a Gun)
(State v. Serna, CR-13-0306-PR, Aug. 7, 2014 - limits “safety” seizure of firearm)
(Updated 2015 & 2016 legislation)
(2015 & 2016 legislation affecting the carry of firearms is very limited)
(2015: Nevada re-recognizes Arizona CCW - new law)
(Updated 2012 legislation, D.C. v. Heller notes
& McDonald v. Chicago [applying Heller to states] notes)
(Right to Carry while hunting - 2012)
Not trying to be a wise ass but...."that's the way the statute is written," whether it makes sense or not.Pro2a said:Maybe I'm missing something....
If nothing is required, then why is an "instructor"/qualified person even needed to sign off on the application in the first place?
HAHA good pointdeanq said:Not trying to be a wise ass but...."that's the way the statute is written," whether it makes sense or not.Pro2a said:Maybe I'm missing something....
If nothing is required, then why is an "instructor"/qualified person even needed to sign off on the application in the first place?
deanq said:Not trying to be a wise ass but...."that's the way the statute is written," whether it makes sense or not.Pro2a said:Maybe I'm missing something....
If nothing is required, then why is an "instructor"/qualified person even needed to sign off on the application in the first place?
Pro2a said:Coming from an NRA instructor, I can't find any required content to be presented to AZ CCW applicants.
Is there really nothing required for a CCW course anymore?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.