WHY

[YNOTAZ]

Latest newsletter from AZCDL about the slugs in Arizona:

​

In order to vote, you must be registered to do so at your current address. According to the Grand Canyon Times, 133,000 Arizona firearms owners are not even registered. For many, it may be due to complacency or they think their vote doesn't matter. And if you are one of the many shooters who think, “This is Arizona, it can’t happen here,” you are dead wrong.

Pro-rights legislators have only a one-seat majority in the state House and state Senate. If even one of those seats “flips” in each chamber, everything we’ve accomplished in the last 20 years could be lost in a single session! Our fanatically anti-gun governor will sign any legislation limiting your right to keep and bear arms that hits her desk and her party is already proposing some doozies.

It is absolutely vital that pro-rights legislators maintain a majority in the state legislature!

In tight elections, even a small number of votes can mean the difference between a gun-friendly legislature and one bent on restricting your rights.

Register to vote today, then vote for those that will protect your right to keep and bear arms!

 

[knockonit]

nuff said

 

[Creeker]

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26612417

https://news.ku.edu/news/article/2020/10/08/gap-between-gun-owners-and-non-owners-explains-disparities-political-attitudes-voting

Trump didn’t respond to requests for his sources for his claims, so it’s likely something he just made up because it sounded good in the moment. Speaking of, you originally claimed the number was 70% and now say it’s 65%. Which made up “fact” is it?

Do you even read the crap you post?

Article one significant points:
“Since 1970s possessing a firearm increases likelihood of voting republican increased by 50%”

A 50% increase from 2 voters = 3 voters. They give no number or even estimates, of percentage of gun owners who vote at all much less how many are "likely" to swing republican. Meaningless


Article Two significant points:

“There’s a much larger probability between a person who owns one gun and another who owns 10 of voting for a Republican”

In English real gun folks will likely vote republican. FUDDS, who knows how they will vote? But once again, no numbers no percentages. Meaningless

“is that owners are more likely to vote in general than non-owners.”

“Currently, nearly 40% of households contain some type of firearm, “

“With all these factors in play, the author is surprised this hasn’t become a bigger issue during the election.” Meaningful

He is no more surprised than me. He should get an account on this site, perhaps read your posts. It might answer his questions.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/surprising-gun-ownership-rise-among-liberals-according-new-report.amp

And then there’s this. I assume you want all of them turning out too?

Article Three: A Fox New article with a headline:

“Surprising': Gun ownership on the rise among liberals according to a new report”

Referring back to your Article two, this refutes whatever point you tried to make with this.

“Obviously, if someone is a Democrat who bought a gun in March, they’re not going to run out and immediately vote for Trump or any other Republican. But my book does suggest future elections might be affected by this national increase in gun owners,”

He just defined liberal FUDDS and says they won’t change their vote.

Finally:

Who would expect Trump to respond to correspondence likely printed in crayon, based on your other posts on this topic.

NO SOUP FOR YOU

As far as my number 65% v 70% it was from my recollection, giving the benefit of the doubt let’s say it is only 65% of gun owners that don’t vote, do you feel less offended now Bunky?

You’re illiterate. All I can do is laugh at your attempt to form a thought. Use all of the large font, bold, etc. that you want but you’re still a f***in retard.

 

[YNOTAZ]

Creeker:
Song by Tyler Childers:
Lyrics:

In a small corner bar he sits there a-drinkin'
Lost as a ball in a field full of corn

No need to further engage the corny guy with the lost balls drinking in the corner.

Butt..... you really should try to read your "facts" before posting them.

 

[Creeker]

Creeker:
Song by Tyler Childers:
Lyrics:

In a small corner bar he sits there a-drinkin'
Lost as a ball in a field full of corn

No need to further engage the corny guy with the lost balls drinking in the corner.

Butt..... you really should try to read your "facts" before posting them.

First of all, both were based on the same facts. The first was behind a paywall, which I correctly assumed you don’t have access to, so the second was an article about the author/works of the first. In the second, you can read that they concluded gun owners were more likely to vote. The point had nothing to do with who they were voting for, which is was you became infatuated with. If you were 1/10th as intelligent as you think you are would have put two and two together as the names are right there.

The point of the Fox article, which clearly went way over your head, was that maybe you shouldn’t bitch about gun owners not voting if liberals make up a growing share of new gun owners.

Just because you’re too retarded to actually read and comprehend facts doesn’t mean they aren’t there, bitch.

 

[xerts1191]

 

[cool arrow]

Just because you’re too retarded to actually read and comprehend facts doesn’t mean they aren’t there, b****.

I have known Tony for quite awhile. He is a lot of things, one of which is being well educated, he is definitely not retarded...

 

[kenpoprofessor]

Just because you’re too retarded to actually read and comprehend facts doesn’t mean they aren’t there, b****.

I have known Tony for quite awhile. He is a lot of things, one of which is being well educated, he is definitely not retarded...

Yea, funny these anonypussy posters huh?

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

 

[YNOTAZ]

Just because you’re too retarded to actually read and comprehend facts doesn’t mean they aren’t there, b****.

I have known Tony for quite awhile. He is a lot of things, one of which is being well educated, he is definitely not retarded...

Mark, thanks, but defending me to that guy implies I'm in the same universe as his level of idiocy. That's why I felt no need to respond to his last meaningless diatribe.

 

[Lobo2087]

Now arrow..... yeah cool is a bit of a retarded.

 

[knockonit]

i worry about all of you boys...............heheeh

 

[Creeker]

Just because you’re too retarded to actually read and comprehend facts doesn’t mean they aren’t there, b****.

I have known Tony for quite awhile. He is a lot of things, one of which is being well educated, he is definitely not retarded...

Mark, thanks, but defending me to that guy implies I'm in the same universe as his level of idiocy. That's why I felt no need to respond to his last meaningless diatribe.

You didn’t respond because you accused me of not reading, when in reality it was you that didn’t read/couldn’t comprehend. You weren’t being the bigger person but rather tucking your tail like the coward you are.

 

[WhiteDragon]

We're all quite retarded here! :mrgreen:

 

[YNOTAZ]

To get back on topic, 133,000 Arizona gun owners are not even registered to vote.

If you want to come on here or other forums, thump your chest, and shout "come and get it" or "from my cold dead hands" You're not real believable if you won't even vote to protect your rights.

The deadline to register is Monday 10/9. Then you have to get up off your sorry asses and vote.

 

[Creeker]

To get back on topic, 133,000 Arizona gun owners are not even registered to vote.

If you want to come on here or other forums, thump your chest, and shout "come and get it" or "from my cold dead hands" You're not real believable if you won't even vote to protect your rights.

The deadline to register is Monday 10/9. Then you have to get up off your sorry asses and vote.

Back on topic with more made up numbers. It’s impossible to know how many gun owners are or aren’t registered to vote. For someone who accuses others of not reading before posting… the number published (without any justification outside of an image on X) was “gun owners and hunters” not just gun owners. But hey, it makes a good headline for the retards to repost.

 

[knockonit]

,time for the ignor switch, lol, anyhowz, regardless of what anyone believes, if you don't exercise your vote for freedom of gun ownership.
Remind everyone to vote, if the numbers don't show and make the right gemokes in, we are destined to loose something in the way of rights here, the present administration in Az is very unfriendly to any individual rights, she an ex valley girl and useless when it comes to Arizonan ways,
vote and vote as many times as you can :mrgreen:

 

[YNOTAZ]

Monday is the deadline:

 

[Creeker]

The actual post by the organization that supposedly did the “study.” Again, impossible to actually know what the real number of gun owners is or the number of those that wouldn’t vote for your king anyway.

 

[kenpoprofessor]

The actual post by the organization that supposedly did the “study.” Again, impossible to actually know what the real number of gun owners is or the number of those that wouldn’t vote for your king anyway.

IMG_3820.jpeg

Wow, just wow, this is a whole new level of stupid, like stupid squared.

Clyde

 

[Lobo2087]

I had to wipe four times this morning. FOUR!

What's this world coming too?