Videos of engagements

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Register Log in
I try to not say "never"... or "always"... when it comes to this stuff... at least if I can help it... That said, I'm on the other side of the question about "getting involved." I don't think I can do "nothing" if another person is losing their life.

Like knockonit says - it's a question of personal conscience and I don't think I could keep walking - or could live with myself knowing that I put the quality of my life (the loss of "stuff" and money) above some other innocent party's life.

It's a golden rule thing for me. If it was my brother, son, or wife being stabbed - I'd want someone walking by to try to stop it... and that's why I hope I'd have what it takes to do the same.
 
They say just comply and give up the money and you'll be fine. No need to resist or fight because you're just more likely to end up dead

Tell that to this guy.



[media]https://www.facebook.com/100081829922454/videos/1522098828348481?idorvanity=5665511206819695[/media]
 
Peruvian cops don't play fair.

[media]https://www.facebook.com/100071577291606/videos/956125886083989?idorvanity=5665511206819695[/media]
 
https://www.police1.com/officer-shootings/videos-ariz-police-sniper-wounds-gunman-who-fired-on-officers-leading-to-fatal-shootout

Guy gets shot with an AR, goes down, then gets up again, and keeps walking and shooting!
I'd really like to know what bullet he was hit with, and where he was hit.
 
smithers599 said:
https://www.police1.com/officer-shootings/videos-ariz-police-sniper-wounds-gunman-who-fired-on-officers-leading-to-fatal-shootout

Guy gets shot with an AR, goes down, then gets up again, and keeps walking and shooting!
I'd really like to know what bullet he was hit with, and where he was hit.
Click to expand...

“Mogadishu” effect? Whacked out on khat/some other chemical enhancement?
 
smithers599 said:
https://www.police1.com/officer-shootings/videos-ariz-police-sniper-wounds-gunman-who-fired-on-officers-leading-to-fatal-shootout

Guy gets shot with an AR, goes down, then gets up again, and keeps walking and shooting!
I'd really like to know what bullet he was hit with, and where he was hit.
Click to expand...

My first question was "where did they hit him." Wondering if it was a shoulder / arm hit and he bled out... Dude didn't even flinch on the first two shots - any you can see the blood trail in the IR shot - starting where he dropped after the third shot. I've got to assume that the first two were misses - which would make the third one hitting an extremity more expected. Also makes me want to understand how long of a shot it was. He's running a 1X RDS so I wonder how much of a factor distance played.
 
Dauph said:
https://twitter.com/KevinForBOS/status/1568607337958764551?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Click to expand...

Running back through some of the old ones... Watching this one all I could hear in my head was Ron White saying "I didn't know how many it would take to kick my ass... but I knew how many they were going to use... all of them... " :-)
 
Scottsdale Road and Cactus, at 5:30 p.m.
Can you imagine just driving down the road, maybe on your way home from work, and this breaks out next to you?

https://twitter.com/ScottsdalePD/status/1772767538767900850
 
Dauph said:
21 foot rule

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/VnhSMJr8luk
Click to expand...

If you're not training that scenario, then you'll be stabbed. In fact, Carlos has a video on it.

417544947_10161931077408296_5439740777832565151_n.jpg


However, he's correct, cops have that "qualified immunity" we don't, so they can get away with it.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde
 
Dauph said:
21 foot rule

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/VnhSMJr8luk
Click to expand...

That video is BS.

The statute is “reasonable and necessary”. Regardless of distance, if a reasonable person thought it was necessary to use deadly physical force, it should be justifiable. The prosecutional standard for determining reasonable and necessary is Ability, Opportunity and Jeopardy (AOJ). Those three elements must be in play. A person with an edged weapon represents ability. Their proximity represents opportunity as well as can represent jeopardy. In AZ there is a presumption of self-defense. The prosecutor has to prove it wasn’t self defense.

Besides the Turley drill was not about shooting someone at 21 feet. It was about not having your weapon holstered, and not being prepared to react to someone with a knife within that distance. It had nothing to do with shooting them. It was just an acknowledgement that if they decided to attack you it would be very hard to get your weapon out and stop the threat based on reaction times and their ability to close distance. The whole point of that drill has always been that in those types of distances, your weapon should already be drawn. The decision to actually shoot isn’t just about distance alone. The other parts of that drill are about learning to put obstacles (like your vehicle) between you to increase your response time and lessen their ability to attack you and potentially never have to shoot at all.
 
Joe_Blacke said:
That video is BS.

The statute is “reasonable and necessary”. Regardless of distance, if a reasonable person thought it was necessary to use deadly physical force, it should be justifiable. The prosecutional standard for determining reasonable and necessary is Ability, Opportunity and Jeopardy (AOJ). Those three elements must be in play. A person with an edged weapon represents ability. Their proximity represents opportunity as well as can represent jeopardy. In AZ there is a presumption of self-defense. The prosecutor has to prove it wasn’t self defense.

Besides the Turley drill was not about shooting someone at 21 feet. It was about not having your weapon holstered, and not being prepared to react to someone with a knife within that distance. It had nothing to do with shooting them. It was just an acknowledgement that if they decided to attack you it would be very hard to get your weapon out and stop the threat based on reaction times and their ability to close distance. The whole point of that drill has always been that in those types of distances, your weapon should already be drawn. The decision to actually shoot isn’t just about distance alone. The other parts of that drill are about learning to put obstacles (like your vehicle) between you to increase your response time and lessen their ability to attack you and potentially never have to shoot at all.
Click to expand...


Before going off half cocked and misspelling things, this is where the myth and legend originated.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BNkOTTRW9o


And this is what has progressed from that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Upxfo_jBrDE

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde
 
Attack of the pistol-packin Pakis

[media]https://www.facebook.com/shayaniqbal.shayaniqbal/videos/1076762210084028?idorvanity=5665511206819695[/media]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ammoland
Silencer Central’s Suppressor Lobbying Sparks Controversy Over NFA Deregulation Stance
Replies
1
Views
215
Suck My Glock
Suck My Glock
Suck My Glock
Science settles the question; Are dudes who carry guns compensating for small willies?
Replies
1
Views
477
QuietM4
Q
Suck My Glock
Europe’s largest Ammo Maker can’t expand because of ‘cat videos'
Replies
1
Views
969
xerts1191
X
B
An itch Scratched!
Replies
9
Views
3K
deserttrans
D
B
good Ol pump .. proved my beliefs
Replies
12
Views
8K
Buckshot Bill
B

Share this page

Back
Top