That boy’s a crack shot

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Welcome! You have been invited by dubblewinger to join our community. Please click here to register.

Pro2a

Member
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
937
Location
Buckeye
Should that guy be owed some money for 55 days in jail?


https://www.victoriaadvocate.com/counties/dewitt/prosecutor-bullet-holes-showed-self-defense-for-man-cleared-of/article_def55934-d637-11e8-9546-637075a1ed02.html
 
smithers599 said:
Why was he ever arrested in the first place?
That's what I was wondering. The evidence at the scene, not to mention witness statements, should have shown clearly that this was a self defense shooting.
Looks like the police department and the prosecutors office are Bush League at best
 
But look at the different angles of the shots into his truck.
If a guy makes a run at you in his pickup, would you shoot?
You shoot as he's coming at you, and you shoot from the ground as you dive out of the way.
He stops after he drives past, gets out and takes one shot at you...
 
smithers599 said:
Why was he ever arrested in the first place?

Because prosecutors openly brag they can indict a ham sandwich. If there is the slightest chance of another notch on their conviction record they will go for it at our expense so they can brag I put away XXXX number of murderers when running for a higher office with more power, and I hate them. Put me on a jury and if I don't like anyone from the prosecution, his tie or their witnesses it is not guilty and I am sticking with it, anyone wearing a tie is not trustworthy as far as I am concerned. Except if it is a prosecution of a elected or public official then it is guilty and hang them for the lives of my friends who they have destroyed mostly over firearms licenses.
 
The District Attorney (who presumably filed the charges) was quoted as saying, "the Grand Jury made the right choice" after they dismissed the charges. Which begs the question, why were they filed in the first place then?
 
Steve_In_29 said:
The District Attorney (who presumably filed the charges) was quoted as saying, "the Grand Jury made the right choice" after they dismissed the charges. Which begs the question, why were they filed in the first place then?

To see if they could indict the ham sandwich after they twisted the truth just so they can add another conviction to their resume for future offices they may seek.
 
Back
Top