Suck My Glock
Member
The betrayal is complete.
Unless he invokes the Insurrection Act, the nation just died,...again.
Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules
- Thread starter Dauph
- Start date
Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!
Join today!
The betrayal is complete.
Unless he invokes the Insurrection Act, the nation just died,...again.
Tenring
Member
It is official - we live in a totally corrupt lawless Nation now.
Unless a miracle happens there will be no return.
Unless a miracle happens there will be no return.
Pray for the Georgia Senate election. Last hope for the country.
ooda
Member
So much for the 3 judges Trump put in, Time to take out the garbage Liberals.
Suck My Glock
Member
I guess the revolution starts now, eh?
So where do we go to start plotting out from under prying eyes?
So where do we go to start plotting out from under prying eyes?
Tenring
Member
POTUS is not giving in so there is that, some new media adds running starting tomorrow.
Tenring
Member
Tenring said:
Just read this:
https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/giuliani-biden-trump-2020/2020/12/11/id/1001175/
Tenring
Member
Is the FBI the enemy of the people...they sure seem to be.
https://www.westernjournal.com/texas-ag-paxton-gets-hit-fbi-subpoena-days-taking-election-supreme-court/?utm_source=site&utm_medium=protrumpnews&utm_campaign=can
https://www.westernjournal.com/texas-ag-paxton-gets-hit-fbi-subpoena-days-taking-election-supreme-court/?utm_source=site&utm_medium=protrumpnews&utm_campaign=can
Pale Rider
Member
Allen West has the right idea. The Constitution is dead in some of these states, and if the Supreme idiots won't uphold it, what is the rest of the country supposed to do?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/seccession-texas-gop-calls-new-union-states-will-abide-constitution-wake-supreme-court
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/seccession-texas-gop-calls-new-union-states-will-abide-constitution-wake-supreme-court
Dauph said:
I think I love her.
You want Balkanization?
Cause this is how you get Balkanization.
Sad that the Supreme Court refused to even hear it, their whole mission was to uphold constitutional law, and they were too scared to make a ruling one way or the other on a constitutional case.
At the least they should have heard it and upheld the vote, as it sits now they just left it unanswered, they are a complete waste.
They had one job, and couldn’t even do it.
Cause this is how you get Balkanization.
Sad that the Supreme Court refused to even hear it, their whole mission was to uphold constitutional law, and they were too scared to make a ruling one way or the other on a constitutional case.
At the least they should have heard it and upheld the vote, as it sits now they just left it unanswered, they are a complete waste.
They had one job, and couldn’t even do it.
Or perhaps they're making sure they're doing it the right way, waiting for the best possible evidence, and making sure that it's difficult to question their decision?
Maybe I'm an optimist, perhaps even naive, but I'm not going to give up hope until there's no reason to hope any more.
Maybe I'm an optimist, perhaps even naive, but I'm not going to give up hope until there's no reason to hope any more.
No, they punted, this case was cut and dry, all they had to do was decide if the 4 states violated the constitution or not with their voting allowances.
Simple yes or no.
Even had they decided that there was no impropriety, that at least would have been a decision, their refusal to hear the case is nothing less than willfull incompetence.
It’s going to be impossible after all this time to prove voter fraud, and a much harder case to argue even given all the evidence on hand.
The court turned chicken and washed their hands on all of this, knowing full well that they’ll also refuse to hear any voter fraud cases as well, they violated their oaths to uphold the constitution by denying this case, and refused to do the job they were placed on the bench to do.
Screw them, this is nothing new, how many firearms cases have they refused for fear of setting precedent?
They are not worthy of their positions as they’re either bought out, blackmailed, or too scared to to their job.
Simple yes or no.
Even had they decided that there was no impropriety, that at least would have been a decision, their refusal to hear the case is nothing less than willfull incompetence.
It’s going to be impossible after all this time to prove voter fraud, and a much harder case to argue even given all the evidence on hand.
The court turned chicken and washed their hands on all of this, knowing full well that they’ll also refuse to hear any voter fraud cases as well, they violated their oaths to uphold the constitution by denying this case, and refused to do the job they were placed on the bench to do.
Screw them, this is nothing new, how many firearms cases have they refused for fear of setting precedent?
They are not worthy of their positions as they’re either bought out, blackmailed, or too scared to to their job.
daviddiesel
Member
When Texas becomes its own sovereign nation we are all going to have to rent uhauls.