That is one butt-ugly fore end though.
I imagine the meeting for this thing was like this :
Marketing guy: "Hey, you know how all those "chassis rifles" are the rage?
Product designer guy: "Yeah, we could do one of those with a cool modular system, high end barrel, in a modern efficient cartridge,maybe use the action from our new rifle, it would be cool"
Market guy : "whoa there big spender, pump the brakes. Take our AR, make it not compatible with some of the standard AR stuff, make the lower one gigantic huge heavy chunk o' metal, make it ugly, and leave it in 223. We will give it an edgy cool name."
Product designer guy : "But that won't be any more precision than a nice AR to begin with?"
Marketing guy : "So what, the magazines will pump it up cause advertising dollars, and the fanbois will buy it cause we made it, and it will get hype cause we used the term chassis and precision and one version will be peanut butter colored. Make sure you put things in places that will be a bitch to clean - make them look like a car grill on the end of the fore end and mag well."
Product designer guy : "Sigh, another unoriginal product with stupid names"
Marketing guy: Hows the SA-35 doing? You guys figure out how to make that 86 year old design reliable yet? They are flying off the shelves already...."
Product design guy *Shoots himself in the face with a 1911 Range Officer Champion Elite Ronin OSP TRP Operator*
Lol.
And of course, video with lots of buzz words for basically what amounts to an expensive, overweight, goofy looking AR. Oh, a three shot "Sub MOA" guarantee." Funny my 20+ year old Bushmaster Varminter was a Sub MOA rifle when it was new. Springfield Armory - what's new then, we say is new now." Lol.
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjcj-oCqgt0[/media]