READ carefully...Supreme Court Rules on 3-D guns

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Welcome! You have been invited by TJMX397 to join our community. Please click here to register.

Miker12

Member
Joined
May 27, 2018
Messages
962
Location
Prescott
In recent years, especially after the massacre in Parkland, gun control has become a hot-button issue among political groups. Politicians from both sides have called for extreme measures and protests have been held. The AR-15, a sporting rifle, has been labeled an “assault rifle,” and a “weapon of war,” discouraging the use and purchase of said rifle. In a press release, the Second Amendment Foundation stated,

Significantly, the government expressly acknowledges that non-automatic firearms up to .50-caliber—including modern semi-auto sporting rifles such as the popular AR-15 and similar firearms—are not inherently military.”

Many conservatives that their Second Amendment right will be taken away by the gun-control advocates on the left, however, this settlement, while not actual law, may make a significant difference is the handling of Second Amendment cases.

https://www.theblaze.com/video/2a-win-government-will-allow-cody-wilson-to-print-and-distribute-plans-for-3d-printed-gun

Original Settlement: https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/07/11/department-of-justice-rules-that-plans-for-3d-printed-gun-parts-are-protected-under-free-speech
 
Additionally all claims in the article are from the Second Amendment Foundation (which is a really good one to send money to- they really stand behind us little people) and Glenn Beck. Nowhere is a link to anywhere the govt states their definition. This could be out of context or entirely made up or misconstrued by Beck or the reporter.
need more links
 
Back
Top