sonofbp said:
They say what makes it a rifle are the type of optic, length of pull, surface area of the brace/receiver extension, and other things. They refuse to define what any of those things are so they cannot be complied with. They don't want the ability to comply in a way they don't like as was done with the 94 AWB.
I'm going to take a free sbr on something I was planning on doing anyways but just that one, hopefully this s*** gets destroyed in the courts and preferably the nfa as a whole... this vague and capricious "redefining" of things already defined in stature needs to stop.
The non-compliance on this is going to be way more widespread than the much less widely owned bumpstocks.
How do you know they won't say the brace has to stay, you can't put a stock on it, even if you registered it as an SBR. They'll have pictures, and it must stay in that configuration I'm betting.
Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day
Clyde