NY Attorney Dissolve the NRA

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

https://thereload.com/exclusive-nra-revenues-cut-in-half-since-2018-legal-spending-spiked-again-in-2021/

GOING BROKE? DON’T SEE HOW MUCH LONGER THIS CAN GO ON, THIS ARTICLE,WAS RELEASED IN FEB. THIS YEAR, WELL HAS TO BE GOING DRY SOON GIVEN THE MONEY BEING SPENT ON LEGAL FEES
 
Wayne’s golden parachute
A filing in the New York lawsuit shows how it began in December 2013 and steadily grew more lucrative until the last document in April 2018. This is not just a retirement golden parachute, this is one trimmed with diamonds.

2013: $1 to $1.1 million per year for five years, upon retirement. Total of $5.4 million. Good for a part-time retirement job.

2018: $1.3 to $1.5 million for seven years, total of $10.3 million of members' money, with note that "safe lodging" (his mansion?) and "secure transportation" ( the private leased jets) are extras.

Only the last is also signed by two officers from the board, as was required for all contracts obligating NRA for more than $100,000.

From the 2013 contract, "It can be said that you are exactly the kind of intelligent and enthusiastic individual who will contribute significantly to the NRA over the next five years." That the president of NRA felt that, when handing LaPierre millions, he had to kiss his posterior in addition, says a lot.

Research: yes, the down payment for LaPierre's mansion (to be purchased by NRA) was made in April 2018, about ten days before his 2018 contract was signed. The "safe lodging" he would receive in addition to his pay must refer to that. Add on a free $6 million mansion (since the contract says that and the private jets are not included in his pay, a tax-free mansion and private jets). A sweet retirement package, all funded by NRA's members!

Mystery: the December 2013 contract isn't written as if LaPierre's retirement is indefinite, it doesn't say "for five years after you retire." Instead, it says the golden parachute will begin in 2014. Was LaPierre set to retire in January 2014, and then changed his mind?

Comment
Tip icon image You can also reply to this email to leave a comment.
Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from NRA in Danger.
Change your email settings at manage subscriptions.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://nraindanger.wordpress.com/2022/09/02/more-info-on-lapierre-golden-parachute/
Powered by WordPress.com
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play
 
We've blogged before of the remarkable, almost 100%, losing record of the Brewer firm in representing NRA. Here's one list we made of the losses. Here's an addition to it. Now we can add one more to the list.
When he was forced out, ILA head Chris Cox signed a contract with NRA. Some conflict must have come up, because he and NRA entered arbitration over its terms. It was discovered in the bankruptcy suit that NRA had already paid $8 million in legal fees to arbitrate a $2 million dispute.
In arbitration, the Brewer firm saw an opportunity to generate even more cash. It attacked the arbitrator, saying that he'd sent a racist email and one of his law partners (his firm has around a thousand partners) was a golfing buddy with Cox's attorney. It sued the arbitrator's employer and Cox's attorney's law firm. When NRA lost that suit, the Brewer firm appealed. Now, it lost the appeal, too. Scroll to the end of the list. Affirmed by MOJ" means by memorandum of judgment. It was so obviously a loser that the appeals court didn't think it was worth writing an opinion, just filed a memo saying the trial court was right to dismiss the suit.
A few years ago, NRA was wasting about 12% of its budget on a PR firm that produced almost no real PR. The real reason was that the head of the firm was "Wayne's brain," dictating LaPierre's every decision. Now it's wasting $30-40 million a year, about 12% of its budget, on the Brewer firm, which produces a long list of legal defeats. The real reason is that Bill Brewer has become "Wayne's brain." The board that for years elected Angus McQueen de facto head of NRA is now electing Bill Brewer to the same post.
What do we know about the person the board is making NRA's de fact head? One gun lawyer has written:
"Mr. Brewer has made about $200,000 in political donations, almost entirely to Democrats, and to Democrat party organizations. Including last year to Beto O’Rourke in his race against stalwart Second Amendment supporter Ted Cruz (my Senator). And maximum donations (over $10k) to Hillary in 2008 and before, and even to Al Franken. When he occasionally (rarely) donates to Republicans its often to the ones popular with Democrats, like Californian Tom Campbell. Mr. Brewer’s wife’s donation lacks the occasional RINO donation and includes max Obama donations. Brewer’s top partner is also a loyal democrat donor, and none of the other partners are active political donors.
And that’s all fine, legal, ethical, and no cause for me to complain – at least about that law firm and its lawyers.
But I’d like to know the decision process that leads to NRA to put tens of millions of dollars into the pockets of donors to the very campaigns the NRA magazine is warning readers about (and soliciting donations to fight!) While I can’t question the capabilities of the firm they hired presumably due to a connection with the PR firm, I can confidently suggest that there are hundreds of law firms in the nation that would have been capable of handling the case, and even if they weren’t all ardent Second Amendment supporters like yours truly, at least they wouldn’t be giving aid and comfort to the enemies of our most precious liberties."
 
Nominating Committee rejected not only Frank Tait, Rocky Marshall and Judge Journey, but also Graham Hill, an intelligent director who'd been on the board for about ten years. Hill is a first-rate attorney with knowledge of government and political issues. He's served as chairman of Legislative Policy Committee, and vice-chair of Legal Affairs, so he was an important part of the board.

He's also honest and dedicated to the gun rights cause -- which may have been his problem with the Nominating Committee.

We can't help but wonder if NRA's leadership isn't out to eliminate the attorneys from the board? Maybe they don't want people with legal knowledge serving, they might ask the wrong type of questions, like why are we spending fortunes on law firms that lose time after time after time? The leadership is unhappy with its board of directors, and wants to get a new one? The board doesn't seem to object.

Comment
Tip icon image You can also reply to this email to leave a comment.
 
https://public-api.wordpress.com/bar/?stat=groovemails-events&bin=wpcom_email_click&redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fnraindanger.wordpress.com%2F2022%2F09%2F19%2Finfo-from-september-nra-board-meeting%2F&sr=1&signature=54c1e7f964d740cdf40ab3acc27d369a&user=69d4b6510707528611e9714fda99d701&_e=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&_z=z

LETS HAVE A MEETING
 
Site logo image NRA in Danger
Under Wild Skies Wins Against NRA


nraindanger
Sep 21
Under Wild Skies is a corporation and NRA vendor, whose function was to send NRA officials (LaPierre's own hunt was a disaster) on free safaris, then bill the costs to NRA. UWS wasn't owned by Ackerman McQueen, it was a separate corporation, but all or most of its board were Ackerman/Mercury Group staffers, whom we assume are also the shareholders.

UWS had a multi-year contract with NRA (maybe five years) and when NRA cut its ties with Ackerman, it cut them with UWS, too. UWS sued in Fairfax County Circuit Court for breach of contract, and NRA counterclaimed for a bunch of things.

We're told all of NRA's claims were shot down, and the jury awarded UWS $550,000. It may be worse than that, as the court only allowed damages for payments already past due (maybe just for those past due when the complaint was filed in 2019), not for future payments as they come due over the remaining years of the contract. That means that UWS can probably sue again for the remainder.

We're told that the Brewer team for NRA was 10-11 attorneys; UWS had 1 or 2. The Brewer firm likely made a mint on the case. A weeklong trial, after three years of fighting, with a team of 10-11 attorneys billing at up to Brewer's $1,400 per hour. The legal fees alone must have run into the millions, perhaps tens of millions.

Add one more to their long string of losses for NRA.
 
https://lawandcrime.com/guns/you-get-one-crack-at-it-manhattan-judge-rejects-the-nras-latest-bid-to-dismiss-attorney-generals-lawsuit/

JUDGE SAYS NO
 
Site logo image NRA in Danger
Millie Hallow Gone?


nraindanger
Oct 2
Rumors from inside are that Millie Hallow, LaPierre's "right hand woman," and officially managing director of executive operations, has been fired or retired, certainly with a fistful of hush money.

She had been convicted of embezzlement from a nonprofit before she was hired by LaPierre, and after hiring was found she'd taken at least $40,000 from NRA. She wasn't fired, just made to pay it back. She probably had enough dirt on everyone in leadership that they couldn't fire her.

The rumors say that Tyler Schrop, head of Advancement (that is, soliciting big donors), and who was involved in a lot of luxury spending, departed at the same time.
 
Site logo image NRA in Danger
LaPierre Letter To Board vs. Millie Hallow Deposition


nraindanger
Oct 2
At the time the scandals were revealed in 2019, Wayne LaPierre sent a letter to the NRA board. In it, he said that Ollie North had made a phone call to Millie Howell, and it spelled out the phone call. North said he called "to relay the contents of a letter drafted by AM," Ackerman McQueen. North said he'd been told by director Dan Boren that "unless I resigned as the Executive Vice President of the Association, Ackerman would transmit this allegedly damaging letter to the entire NRA board.... (following bolded in original letter) But then Col. North explained that the letter would not be sent -- if I were to resign as Executive Vice President. And, if I supported Col. North's continued tenure as president, he stated he could "negotiate" an "excellent retirement for me. After Col. North concluded his telephone call with me, others informed me that I needed to withdraw the NRA lawsuit against AM or be smeared." It goes on to say that North had financial ties to AM, and that North's phone call was " a threat meant to intimidate and divide us."

We found Millie Hallows's deposition. On p. 165 she starts to discuss what happened that day. Boren, not North, called her, while she was in an officers' meeting. Boren said there would be "bad allegations" coming out unless LaPierre resigned (p. 167). She told LaPierre of the AM accusations and he said "that bastard Angus McQueen!" and left the room. She asked VP Childress (who like everyone in the room had heard them) if LaPierre should resign, and he indicated yes, she asked Col. North the same and he only said "not today." (p. 169-170).

Later, around lunchtime, while Hallow was with LaPierre, she received a call from Col. North. (p. 180-181). He said that Boren had read the AM letter to him; she asked if North wanted a copy, he said no, he didn't want anything with the AM letterhead on it. He listed the accusations. He said he was president and could help Wayne, get x months for Wayne (to retire). (p. 184-186). "Q. Did Oliver North ever tell you that he wanted Wayne LaPierre to resign? A. Never." (p. 197). She did not have the impression North had talked with anyone at AM. (p. 197-198).

She later was given a statement drafted by Josh Powell, telling Col. North that he had delivered messages "on behalf of yourself and Ackerman McQueen," (a fabrication, but one that could be shown to the board) and that the Nominating Committee would not re-nominate him. (p. 207-208).

According to Hallow's testimony, the letter LaPierre sent to the board is false. North didn't call to relay a letter from Ackerman, he refused even to see a copy of their letter, the only statement to that effect was created by Josh Powell, LaPierre's chief of staff. North didn't ask LaPierre to support North's own candidacy in exchange, and there was no request to withdraw the suit against Ackerman. The only truthful statement in the LaPierre letter to the board is that North said if LaPierre resigned, North would ensure he had a good retirement package -- something that would have spared NRA a lot of pain and danger.

BTW, Hallow also admitted to diverting NRA money for her son's wedding (p. 140) (reportedly tens of thousands were involved) and felt that LaPierre approved it (p. 148), discussed going with LaPierre on NRA-financed cruise ships (p. 90-92), and admitted using rented car (and driver) services, with LaPierre approval (p. 149-151).
 
Site logo image NRA in Danger
Chris Cox Testimony


nraindanger
Oct 4
Cox was head of NRA-ILA for 17 years, before being purged in 2019, after the scandals broke. He had a good reputation and none of the scandals related to his shop; ILA was a clean operation.

His deposition has a number of revelations:

He thought very little of Josh Powell, LaPierre's Chief of Staff (p. 39-40).

He had little use for attorney Bill Brewer (p. 60-61).

Brewer falsely accused Cox of something (not described) (p. 76).

He details what happened on the important day before the 2019 annual meeting. (p. 156 and on). Director Dan Boren told Cox that Ackerman McQueen was going to release information very damaging to LaPierre. Cox told Boren to call Millie Hallow, LaPierre's "right hand woman" and inform her. This was the best way to contact LaPierre at a meeting.

Cox was in the hotel room officers' meeting later. He asked LaPierre if the accusations were true or not. (p. 166-167). He never suggested LaPierre resign, and never asked him to drop the lawsuit against Ackerman, which Cox thought was a good lawsuit. (p. 173-181). The attorney reads LaPierre's testimony claiming Cox did both, and Cox says that is not true. "Wayne not -- not remembering the conversation that took place accurately is the nicest way I could describe that." He describes LaPierre's claim that he was part of a conspiracy, indeed a criminal conspiracy, against LaPierre as "It's offensive. It's hurtful. But it's absolutely not true."

Angus McQueen had a "profound influence" over LaPierre. (p. 245). He typed a reminder note to himself, something to say to LaPierre, "You and I don't run the organization; it's you and Angus and Tony, and that's okay." (p. 249). Also in the notes, NRA's problems, including "a PR firm in Texas and Oklahoma that's more interesting in marketing to raise money than advertising to grow the brand." Cox obviously was not a fan of Ackerman McQueen.

Conclusion: Cox's testimony is that the entire story told the board was fabricated from the start. There was no conspiracy, no attempt at coup. Ackerman was out to blackmail, yes, but there was no North-Boren-Cox-Ackerman plot. North, Boren, and Cox were people who were alerted to the threat the scandals posed to NRA, and were trying to find solutions.
 
Site logo image NRA in Danger
Steve Hart Testimony


nraindanger
Oct 5
Hart was "attorney to the NRA board" for 11 years, until he was suspended by LaPierre (not by the board, his client) and he resigned. Here is his deposition testimony. (Note that large portions are blanked out). High points:

There were proposals to move the NRA legally to Texas, and to clean things up first so the NY Attorney General couldn't block it. (p. 134-154). NRA created a Lexington and Concord company as part of this. (p. 55-56).

LaPierre controls the Nominating Committee (p. 61) so he controls the board which in turn elects him.

After Oliver North created a "crisis committee" to react to all the scandals that were being revealed, attorney Bill Brewer opposed the creation of the committee. (p. 106-107).

Brewer stopped talking to Hart when Hart raised questions about Brewer's legal bills to NRA. (p. 110-111).

Although LaPierre claimed that he didn't know North was employed by Ackerman McQueen, hinting that North was AM's secret tool. Actually, the contract was negotiated in a long meeting where LaPierre and Millie Hallow were present. (p. 126-134). LaPierre had no objection to the employment contract. (p. 142).

He knew of the bad blood between Bill Brewer and Angus McQueen. "you know, Angus had an ability to talk you to death. But you only had to say Bill Brewer and he'd start stuttering and leave the room." (p. 215).

On Brewer (remember this is the board's attorney speaking), he sent an email: "Professionally, what is happening under Brewer's mind control games will destroy the NRA." Hart adds, "Hindsight will show that instead of resolving it quietly, we created a road map for the New York AG." (p. 254-255).

He's asked who Danny Hakim is, and answers "He is one of Brewer's best contacts in the media world." "Brewer works with him on all different sorts of stories, you know. He is a source; Brewer is a source for Hakim regularly and he feels like he can get Hakim to write positive stories from time to time." (p. 277).

Brewer's law firm has a PR division, and the firm took over NRA's PR, "seizing control of the entire messaging under the theory that, you know, litigation strategy was trumping everything and we had to be careful what we said about the second amendment generally." (p. 284).

The letters signed by Oliver North and Richard Childress, demanding an audit of the Brewer billings, "came out of a large meeting of board members." (p. 289).

Hart concluded early on that Brewer's lawsuit against Ackerman was dangerous. "You know it is not going to go well. And it is going to bring information to light that is going to lead to a New York AG investigation with 100 percent certainty. So, I was pretty unhappy." He expressed that to some directors, and figured he'd probably be terminated for it. (p. 300).

He received a letter from LaPierre saying he was suspended as the board's attorney. Asked if he was expected that, "Oh man, somewhat, yeah. Because I had been opposing Bill Brewer. I mean Bill was taking me out."

"Q. So, it is your view that Bill Brewer orchestrated your removal?
A. Yes.
Q. Because you questioned his legal fees?
A. Yeah." (p. 314-315).

Josh Powell told him that Brewer's hold on LaPierre was that Brewer had told LaPierre that he was "going to keep Wayne out of jail." (p. 343).

Claims that he was involved in some sort of conspiracy: "There was a coordinated effort to try to deal with Bill Brewer, this has been reconstructed as a conspiracy against Wayne." (p. 395). Rumors were spread that he was leaking things to the press: "It is completely false." (p. 401). He has an email from a reporter apologizing for showing up at his house -- he made her leave. (p. 402-403).
 
Site logo image NRA in Danger
LaPierre Mansion: More Proof


nraindanger
Oct 8
We've covered this before (see links below). Short summary: in 2018, a plan was hatched between Ackerman McQueen and the LaPierres, to use NRA money to buy a $6 million Dallas mansion for the LaPierres. It would probably be a retirement home, since it was about a thousand miles from his office at NRA headquarters. It'd be a nice, 10,000 square foot mansion; here's some pics.

The home, on the edge of a country club golf course, would be owned by a newly-created company, "WBB Investments, LLC." (An LLC is a simplified corporation). That was a Delaware LLC, Delaware being a state where you can create an LLC without any of the creators' names being on file.

Why create an LLC to own just one house? So it could have "Investments" in its name, be carried on the NRA books hidden as one more investment. The board and members would never know.

We've done more investigation, and the story is a more complex than that. This affidavit, from Ackerman McQueen's treasurer, says that WBB Investments was owned 99% by NRA and 1% by "DJ Investments, LLC," which would have managed the property (and since it was a 10,000 square foot house management would have been profitable). DJ Investments turns out to be owned by the Angus McQueen family trust, and his son Revan McQueen.

In this blog post, we suggested that the deal might have violated the laws against use of the mails and wires in a fraudulent scheme; the house might have been carried on the NRA books and tax reports as an investment, $6 million invested in "WBB Investments," which would have hidden its existence from the NRA board, the IRS, and NRA members who looked at the corporation's Form 990. We suggested the same here. Now we've found more evidence, strong evidence, that this was the plan.

The deal was started with a $70,000 NRA check for "earnest money" on the purchase, sent to WBB Investments. As a result of the bankruptcy filing, we can see the invoice that led to the check being written, and it says the money is for "investment in security assets." Yes, it was to be hidden as an investment. $6 million in members' money, a non-profit's money, diverted to personal luxury and no one the wiser.
 
Site logo image NRA in Danger
NRA HQ To Move To Texas?


nraindanger
Oct 17
This sounded so insane we waited for confirmations of it, and now we have them.

NRA's leadership is planning for a physical relocation of headquarters to Texas. This would do nothing for them with regard to their fight with the NY Attorney General. That's determined by the fact that NRA is a New York corporation, an artificial being owing its existence to New York law. A physical move does not change this (if it did, NRA's being headquartered in Virginia for the past 30 years would have made a difference). NRA tried to use its disastrous bankruptcy to make it legally a Texas corporation, and that failed completely.

The effects of such a physical relocation would be destructive, enough to finish off the organization. Half or a majority of staff would quit rather than sell their houses, uproot their kids, and move 800 miles. All but LaPierre and a few others at the top are on "at will" employment, and can be fired any day without any reason - who would spend thousands to move when they could be fired the next day? ILA's Federal Affairs lobbyists would be left on the Hill, and isolated from the rest of the organization. NRA, which is now teetering on the edge of going bankrupt for real, would have to pay for its move, sell its headquarters (the office market in Fairfax isn't good), and buy a new HQ. This would just be insane.

If the New York judge catches wind of it, looking as it does like another stupid and futile attempt to escape his jurisdiction, and squandering of the members' money, he might just appoint a conservator to watch over the corporation's assets. The board obviously can't do that job.

We thought this an insane move. But then, so was filing for bankruptcy while (falsely) telling the court NRA is in great financial condition, hiring a $1,400 an hour attorney whose track record is continuous losses, using a PR firm to launder your money and then suing them, firing Chris Cox, hiring an attorney with 14 months' experience to be your General Counsel, making an embezzler (Woody Phillips) your treasurer, and responding to the Attorney General's investigation by purging everyone who'd called for honesty. (Rant endeth here.)
 
Site logo image NRA in Danger
NRA’s Finances And Legal Bills


nraindanger
Oct 20
Read them and weep. 2022 is a projection, based on its first eight months.


Legal expenses have absolutely exploded, even as revenues go thru the floor, as members decide not to renew or contribute. In 2017, legal expenses were 2% of NRA's budget, in 2021 they were 17%, and in 2022 they are likely to be nearly 24%. One dollar in four of a member's dues or contributions is going to attorneys. In the meantime, NRA staff have fallen from over 800 to under 500, and it looks like NRA will run a $40 deficit in 2022, borrowing to keep itself alive, and to pay its legal bills.

There's tens of millions for the lawyers, but not enough to replace the leaking headquarters roof, as we reported a year ago. This reference says they hired a company to repair it, "until the time the company [NRA] is prepared to replace the roof."

The majority of the legal fees, a quarter of NRA's budget, are going to Bill Brewer, of whom a newspaper wrote, "Brewer, 67, does not have the typical profile of a lawyer for the NRA, one of President Donald Trump’s staunchest allies. Campaign filings show that he has donated to numerous Democrats, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Beto O’Rourke."

Why hire him? Multiple persons have sworn that Wayne LaPierre told them Brewer could "keep me out of jail" (see para. 16)
 
NY Suit: LaPierre Files His Answer


nraindanger
Oct 24
In the New York lawsuit, Wayne LaPierre’s Answer has just been filed. There are some amazing admissions, or we might say, confessions, here, especially regarding the use of NRA money on chartered private jets. Those cost about $7,000 per flight hour, plus expenses, so a trip from Fairfax to the West Coast will cost NRA members about $35,000 each way. We’ll just use the paragraph numbers from the Answer, and skip putting quotation marks around each paragraph.

Begin Answer

148. Mr. LaPierre denies the allegations set forth in paragraph 148 of the Complaint, except admits that National Rifle Association of America records show that between June 2016 and February 2018, the organization initially paid for certain flights for his wife and extended family that were related to National Rifle Association of America business when he was not a passenger, that he admitted that he authorized some of these flights, that the flights were not approved for security reasons, and that the flights were not approved by the National Rifle Association of America Board, and states that he has reimbursed the National Rifle Association of America for those flights. [Which is like a burglar defending his conduct by saying, after he got caught, he returned the stolen property].

149. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that, in August 2016, he authorized a private flight for his wife’s niece and her husband to fly from Dallas, TX, to North Platte, NE so that his wife’s niece could attend a National Rifle Association of America Women’s Leadership Forum meeting. . . .

150. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that, in July 2017, he authorized a private flight for his wife’s niece and her daughter to fly from Dallas, TX, to Orlando, FL, and … states that the amount of this benefit realized from this flight was reimbursed by Mr. LaPierre with interest.

151. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that, in October 2016, he authorized a private flight for his wife to fly alone from Madison, WI, to Kearney, NE, and . . . expenses that were determined to constitute excess benefits were reimbursed by Mr. LaPierre to the National Rifle Association of America with interest.

152. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that in January 2017, he authorized a private jet to pick up his wife’s niece’s husband in North Platte, NE, on the way to Las Vegas for a Safari Club convention, that he authorized a private flight to fly his wife’s niece’s husband back to Nebraska, and . . . states that expenses associated with private air travel which were determined to constitute excess benefits were reimbursed by Mr. LaPierre to the National Rifle Association of America.

155. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that, in November 2018, he and his wife took a private roundtrip flight from Washington D.C. to Dallas, TX, and stopped in North Platte, NE, on each leg of the trip, to pick up and drop off his wife’s niece and grandniece so that he, his wife and his wife’s niece could work together on the National Rifle Association of America’s Women’s Leadership Foundation business, and states that charges associated with private air travel which constituted potential excess benefits were reimbursed by Mr. LaPierre.

156. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that in March 2019, he and his wife took a private flight from Washington D.C. to Orlando, FL, and stopped in North Platte, NE, on the way back, to drop off his wife’s niece and grandniece and to do a speech at a Friends of the National Rifle Association of America dinner, and that, in April 2019, he and his wife took a private flight from Washington D.C. to Tulsa, OK, making stops in Omaha and North Platte, NE, so he could make a speech at a Friends of the National Rifle Association of America banquet in Omaha, NE, and work the Tulsa, OK gun show, which is reportedly the largest gun show in the country, and states that potential excess benefit amounts relating to these trips were reimbursed by him with interest.

162. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that, on a few occasions, in connection with her work as a volunteer for the National Rifle Association of America’s Women’s Leadership Foundation, Mr. LaPierre’s wife traveled without Mr. LaPierre on a chartered plane, incurring expenses for which Mr. LaPierre has reimbursed the National Rifle Association of America.

165. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that, since June 2015, he and his family have taken private flights to and from the Bahamas on occasion and that on some of those trips he stopped in Nebraska to pick up and drop off his wife’s niece and her family, and states that charges deemed to constitute excess benefits were reimbursed by Mr. LaPierre.

166. Mr. LaPierre . . .[admits] that he attended celebrity fundraising events during December in the Bahamas.

173. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that he used to frequently meet with the MMP Principal in connection with National Rifle Association of America business, that he took private flights to California on many occasions between late 2013 and early 2017—usually staying at a hotel in Beverly Hills—to meet with the MMP Principal and others, often over lunch or dinner, and that, between 2013 and 2016, the MMP Principal, his wife, and their daughter received gifts from the National Rifle Association of America, for which Mr. LaPierre has reimbursed the National Rifle Association of America.

174. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that he has attended “celebrity retreats” organized by the MMP Principal in the past, that when he attended these retreats, which were held annually in the Bahamas in December, he stayed at the Atlantis resort on Paradise Island, and that his lodging was paid for by the MMP Principal, and that he gave testimony about his visits to the Bahamas, which speaks for itself and is the best evidence of its content. [The head of MMP, one of NRA’s biggest vendors, gave LaPierre Bahama’s vacations in the winter].

175. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that, between 2013 and 2018, he visited the Bahamas in the summer, that during these trips, he stayed on a boat named Illusions, which he believed was owned by the MMP Principal, that his family members joined him on these trips, that the boat was equipped with four staterooms, a jet boat, and two jet skis, had a crew that included a chef . . . .

176. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that until April 2021 he did not disclose his use of the boat in the Bahamas on the National Rifle Association of America Financial Disclosure Questionnaires that he, as an officer and ex officio director of the National Rifle Association of America, submitted to the National Rifle Association of America Secretary annually, and that Question 4 of that questionnaire asked:

“Have you or any relative received, or do you or any relative expect to receive, any gift, gratuity, personal favor, or entertainment with either a retail price or fair market value in excess of $250 from any person or entity that has or is seeking to have a business relationship with, or received funds from, NRA or any NRA Entity?”

177. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that he answered no to this question in every questionnaire he submitted from 2008 to 2020. . . .

183. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that since being elected Executive Vice President of the National Rifle Association of America, he has not used the National Rifle Association of America’s regular travel agent to make his travel arrangements, that, since the 1990s, he has booked travel through a travel consultant based in Woodland Hills, CA, that that travel consultant billed the National Rifle Association of America through two companies, Inventive Incentive & Insurance Services Inc. and GS2 Enterprises, and that he gave testimony about the travel consultant, which speaks for itself and is the best evidence of its content.

202. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that, in May 2017, his wife was appointed to the Board of Directors of the National Park Service Foundation (NPSF), and that, over the next few months, he submitted expense reports requesting expense reimbursements for trips taken with his wife to NPSF events in Alaska and Arizona, and that this was in addition to the expense of the flights used to get them to the NPSF events.

203. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that he has submitted expense reports seeking reimbursements for his wife’s niece’s lodging and airfare for events related to National Rifle Association of America business, that he submitted reimbursement requests for his wife’s niece’s travel expenses on occasion, and that, in 2016 and 2017, the National Rifle Association of America reimbursed certain expenses for his wife’s niece’s airfare and lodging, and states that he has reimbursed the National Rifle Association of America for expenses determined to constitute excess benefits and that he has reimbursed the National Rifle Association of America for the $12,332.75 expense associated with his wife’s niece’s stay at the Four Seasons Hotel in Dallas, Texas in early 2017 referenced in paragraph 203 of the Complaint.

204. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that he has been reimbursed for expenses incurred travelling to and from film shoots for Under Wild Skies, a television program, in Europe and Africa, that he had a decades-long friendship with the principal of Under Wild Skies, Inc. (“UWS”), the corporate entity that produces the program, and that, in 2013, he was reimbursed by the National Rifle Association of America for airfare, lodging, and related expenses that he and his wife incurred travelling to Botswana for an Under Wild Skies film shoot on safari . . . .

206. Mr. LaPierre … admits that, between 2009 and 2017, he expensed membership fees for a golf club located in the Washington D.C. area. . . .

220. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that he gave testimony about an armored vehicle, which speaks for itself and is the best evidence of its content.

222. Mr. LaPierre . . .admits that he and his wife looked at several houses in the Dallas, TX area for possible use as a safe house from time to time.

259. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits, on information and belief, that Phillips retroactively raised Powell’s salary to $800,000. [Treasurer Woody Phillips was able to hand out hundreds of thousands, and raise salaries, without LaPierre or the board being told.]

291. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that he did not consult an executive search firm to assist in identifying qualified candidates for the General Counsel position prior to hiring Frazer, that he did not ask that a search be conducted of Frazer’s prior legal writings or of lawsuits in which he was involved, that he did not take steps to ensure that a credit or social-media check was conducted for Frazer before hiring him as General Counsel. . . .

299. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits, upon information and belief, that, at some point in the 2000s, an investigation of one of his advisors was conducted and investigators concluded that there was no intentional malfeasance on her part, but she was required to repay the National Rifle Association of America for some amount of reimbursement and her National Rifle Association of America credit card was taken away. [This is probably Millie Hallow.]

309. Mr. LaPierre admits that the National Rifle Association of America disclosed in its 2019 Form 990 that the person referred to in paragraph 296 of the Complaint “diverted $41,820.37 from the NRA but has fully repaid the organization, including interest, for a total of $56,241.35.” [Probably Hallow.]

325. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that Ackerman regularly passed expenses to the National Rifle Association of America without justification or appropriate backup. [Nobody talked about this, because Ackerman was then “Wayne’s brain” and could have gotten any NRA employee fired.]

336. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that, in 2018, the President of Mercury Group, Tony Makris, offered to accompany him on a visit to a medical clinic, and that, in connection with this visit, he (Mr. LaPierre) flew on a private charter, that he and the president of Mercury Group stayed at the Four Seasons for several days and that the National Rifle Association of America paid for Mr. LaPierre’s private travel associated with this visit to the medical clinic, and states that to the extent certain expenses were deemed to constitute excess benefits, Mr. LaPierre has reimbursed that amount to the NRA with interest.

346. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that, as part of his work for the National Rifle Association of America and as part of his wife’s volunteer work for the National Rifle Association of America Women’s Leadership Forum, he and his wife appeared in episodes of Under Wild Skies, traveling to and participating in big game hunts in the United States, Botswana, Tanzania, South Africa, and Argentina, and that the expenses associated with these trips— including professional hunter costs, camps, chartered travel, food and beverages, hunting licenses, trophy fees, and taxidermy—were incurred by UWS as part of the show, and lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation that “[a]ccording to the president of Mercury Group and UWS, a single game hunt of this nature could cost upwards of $100,000”.

361. Mr. LaPierre . . . he admits that he was not aware of any consulting services provided to the National Rifle Association of America pursuant to the referenced agreement, and that he gave videotaped testimony about the agreement, which speaks for itself and is the best evidence of its content.

378. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that he gave videotaped testimony regarding whether he thought it was prudent for a charitable nonprofit organization to have an executive negotiate with a vendor while also being paid by that vendor, which speaks for itself and is the best evidence of its content.

409. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that Board Member No. 5 is a past National Rifle Association of America President and is a current National Rifle Association of America Board member who has been paid under the EVP Consulting Budget, that he (Mr. LaPierre), on behalf of the National Rifle Association of America, and Board Member No. 5 executed a ten-year contract with the Board member, and that he gave videotaped testimony regarding contracts with Board Member No. 5, which speaks for itself and is the best evidence of its content. [Marion Hammer]

462. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that at the time of his discussions with Dissident No. l, Dissident No. 1 had a contract at Fox News, and that the National Rifle Association of America’s bylaws did not permit Dissident No. 1 to receive a salary from the National Rifle Association of America as National Rifle Association of America President. [Oliver North. The by-laws forbid payment of salary to board members. But look at the previous paragraph, about signing a ten-year contract with a powerful board member.]

609. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that one week before the bankruptcy filing, on January 7, 2021, the National Rifle Association of America Board approved a new employment agreement with Mr. LaPierre (the “2021 Employment Agreement”).

619. Mr. LaPierre . . . admits that he advised three members of the National Rifle Association of America Board of Directors – the President, the First Vice President and the Second Vice President – who comprised the Special Litigation Committee of the Board of Directors – of his intention to put the National Rifle Association of America into bankruptcy before filing the National Rifle Association of America’s bankruptcy petition, and that, upon information and belief, other members of the board were aware that he was considering putting the National Rifle Association of America into bankruptcy before the petition was filed as part of a restructuring and/or reorganization. [The other directors were only aware he was “considering” such a move.]

End of Answer.

NRA’s CEO, Wayne LaPierre, has admitted, in court and under oath, that he and his cronies “diverted” NRA members’ money to pay for vacations, private jets, luxury hotels, gifts for friends, and everything else. Will the board do anything about this confession? Will they even dare ask him questions about it? We all know the answer to that question
 
and yet the money machine keeps calling for money from donators, this sob should be in the slammer, its been known for decades he was a liar and thief, and nra has suffered under his tutelage, shame at one time it was the crown jewel in the ''fight'' but no longer the greed these sobs had for the almighty buck destroyed its place, all who were involved should be hunted down and dealt with,
knox tried to deal with it, but lost out.
rj
 
Back
Top