Maricopa County Election Audit
- Thread starter xerts1191
- Start date
Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!
Join today!
Need to see more on this
https://twitter.com/BehizyTweets/status/1599281642795065344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1599281644820893698%7Ctwgr%5E487f5f27c649c2497e322b501e916f0ab2baef22%7Ctwcon%5Es2_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fkatie-hobbs-contacted-twitter-to-silence-political-opponents%2F
https://twitter.com/christina_bobb/status/1599399706613923840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1599399706613923840%7Ctwgr%5E487f5f27c649c2497e322b501e916f0ab2baef22%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fkatie-hobbs-contacted-twitter-to-silence-political-opponents%2F
https://twitter.com/BehizyTweets/status/1599281642795065344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1599281644820893698%7Ctwgr%5E487f5f27c649c2497e322b501e916f0ab2baef22%7Ctwcon%5Es2_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fkatie-hobbs-contacted-twitter-to-silence-political-opponents%2F
https://twitter.com/christina_bobb/status/1599399706613923840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1599399706613923840%7Ctwgr%5E487f5f27c649c2497e322b501e916f0ab2baef22%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fkatie-hobbs-contacted-twitter-to-silence-political-opponents%2F
cool arrow
Member
I wish the MSM would actually report on this
https://twitter.com/DougDucey/status/1599854273113690112?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1599854273113690112%7Ctwgr%5Eeb9119f5de8e81139ef116722236a358dfe186d2%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fdoug-ducey-certifies-arizona-election-kari-lake-responds-on-tucker-carlson%2F
deadshot556
Member
TheAccountant said:
Anyways, what were you saying again nut case?
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2018
- Messages
- 766
deadshot556 said:
Did you have another dementia episode or did you get a little too deep into the Natty Ice over the last week?
Either way, it’s all right there in front of you. You could just.. ya know.. read it.
deadshot556
Member
That’s all your low IQ smooth brain can come up with. Go read. Yea.TheAccountant said:
Go vote harder, I’m sure it will help next time and the next.
Suck My Glock
Member
vvalter_vvhite
Member
Yes! Az is so f***ed !
FROM PAUL GOSAR
Did Katie Hobbs Have A Conflict of Interest?
As you know, Katie Hobbs has been declared the winner in Arizona’s governors race over Kari Lake. It was a close election, with Kari “losing” by a mere .06%.
Questions have been raised for a long time whether Hobbs, as Secretary of State, should have supervised an election in which she was the candidate. This appears to be a classic conflict of interest. But Hobbs ignored this and insisted that she be in charge of her own race. In my view, Kate Hobbs had, and continues to have, a clear conflict of interest under Arizona law. She was a candidate in an election that she is ultimately responsible for, from enforcing the Election Procedure Manual, to certification of the canvass, to testing the logic and accuracy and the functioning of the tabulation machines.
No candidate can supervise their own election. Indeed, no candidate can so much as even work at an election poll or counting center (nor can their immediate family members), according to ARS 16-531(A), (D); Arizona Election Procedure Manual pp. 132-139.
Under the conflict-of-interest law: A.R.S. §38-503(A). “Any public employee who has, or whose relative has, a substantial interest in any decision of a public agency shall disclose such interest and refrain from participating in any manner in such decision.”
There are two requirements for recusal. (1) Does the public official have a personal interest in the outcome of the action or decision at issue and (2) is there a financial interest that can be identified? In this case, Hobbs, as the candidate for governor, has a personal interest that differed from the general public. Prong one is satisfied. In addition, the job of governor has a salary of $90,000 plus benefits. This qualifies as a financial benefit or incentive not shared with the general public. Accordingly, Hobbs meets the requirements for recusal and in my view violated the law.
The remedy for a violation of this law: the decision or action taken in which Hobbs participated is “undone” and the process is repeated without her participation. As set forth in the law: “ARS 8.16.4 Private Citizen Suits. Any person who is affected by a public agency's decision made in violation of the conflict-of-interest laws may sue to have the contract or decision declared null and void. A.R.S. § 38-506(B). The court may award costs and attorney's fees to the prevailing party. A.R.S. § 38-506(C). Persons claiming that a public officer, employee, or board member had a pecuniary interest in making a decision against them may also file suit in state or federal court alleging a violation of their civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”
Violation of this law is also a Class 6 felony, according to ARS § 38-510(A)(1).
The Attorney General has stated: “Negligent or reckless violation of the law is a class 1 misdemeanor. This means that public officers or employees may be prosecuted if they fail to disclose a conflict of interest of which they should have known. A.R.S. § 38-510(A)(2).”
Lastly, a public officer found in violation of this law is to be removed from office. Actions taken, for example, a contract signed, are to be voided. In this case, the election could be voided and redone without the conflict.
It has been factually established that upwards of 50% of the voting centers in Maricopa County failed because of disabled printers. This led to lines as long as two to three hours wait time. Many people gave up and never voted that day. It is indeed possible that over 17,000 people were disenfranchised and left the polling centers because they did not have two to three hours to wait that day. That would have been enough to cost Kari Lake the election. There are pending lawsuits. We will have to wait and see if anything comes of this, but based on prior court challenges, I would not hold my breath for court relief.
Did Katie Hobbs Have A Conflict of Interest?
As you know, Katie Hobbs has been declared the winner in Arizona’s governors race over Kari Lake. It was a close election, with Kari “losing” by a mere .06%.
Questions have been raised for a long time whether Hobbs, as Secretary of State, should have supervised an election in which she was the candidate. This appears to be a classic conflict of interest. But Hobbs ignored this and insisted that she be in charge of her own race. In my view, Kate Hobbs had, and continues to have, a clear conflict of interest under Arizona law. She was a candidate in an election that she is ultimately responsible for, from enforcing the Election Procedure Manual, to certification of the canvass, to testing the logic and accuracy and the functioning of the tabulation machines.
No candidate can supervise their own election. Indeed, no candidate can so much as even work at an election poll or counting center (nor can their immediate family members), according to ARS 16-531(A), (D); Arizona Election Procedure Manual pp. 132-139.
Under the conflict-of-interest law: A.R.S. §38-503(A). “Any public employee who has, or whose relative has, a substantial interest in any decision of a public agency shall disclose such interest and refrain from participating in any manner in such decision.”
There are two requirements for recusal. (1) Does the public official have a personal interest in the outcome of the action or decision at issue and (2) is there a financial interest that can be identified? In this case, Hobbs, as the candidate for governor, has a personal interest that differed from the general public. Prong one is satisfied. In addition, the job of governor has a salary of $90,000 plus benefits. This qualifies as a financial benefit or incentive not shared with the general public. Accordingly, Hobbs meets the requirements for recusal and in my view violated the law.
The remedy for a violation of this law: the decision or action taken in which Hobbs participated is “undone” and the process is repeated without her participation. As set forth in the law: “ARS 8.16.4 Private Citizen Suits. Any person who is affected by a public agency's decision made in violation of the conflict-of-interest laws may sue to have the contract or decision declared null and void. A.R.S. § 38-506(B). The court may award costs and attorney's fees to the prevailing party. A.R.S. § 38-506(C). Persons claiming that a public officer, employee, or board member had a pecuniary interest in making a decision against them may also file suit in state or federal court alleging a violation of their civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”
Violation of this law is also a Class 6 felony, according to ARS § 38-510(A)(1).
The Attorney General has stated: “Negligent or reckless violation of the law is a class 1 misdemeanor. This means that public officers or employees may be prosecuted if they fail to disclose a conflict of interest of which they should have known. A.R.S. § 38-510(A)(2).”
Lastly, a public officer found in violation of this law is to be removed from office. Actions taken, for example, a contract signed, are to be voided. In this case, the election could be voided and redone without the conflict.
It has been factually established that upwards of 50% of the voting centers in Maricopa County failed because of disabled printers. This led to lines as long as two to three hours wait time. Many people gave up and never voted that day. It is indeed possible that over 17,000 people were disenfranchised and left the polling centers because they did not have two to three hours to wait that day. That would have been enough to cost Kari Lake the election. There are pending lawsuits. We will have to wait and see if anything comes of this, but based on prior court challenges, I would not hold my breath for court relief.
Similar threads
