trailboss60
Member
YNOTAZ said:hudsguns said:The issue isn't related to the voting (i.e. machine issues, long lines), only real issue is the candidates that lost. Therefore voting worked as expected for the candidates that won "Horne, Yee, Schweikert or Crane", but voting had issues for the candidates that lost "Lake, Masters, Finchem".
All good if I'm the winner, but all bad rigged if I lose.
Really. Sounds like the liberal line of crap.... Carry it out for as long as possible until everybody loses interest or becomes disgusted... I call it the Bidet syndrome. <---you can figure that out
Agreed.
Horne, Yee, Schweikert and Crane just had a wider margin than the candidates that the Democrats were more focused on, that allowed them to prevail.
They mustered their forces on the key races as they trickled out the vote counting.
The Republican establishment bears some blame in allowing Fontes to go unprosecuted in the clear case of corruption when he colluded to make sure Sinema won her seat.
The failure to convict Clinton by the Republicrats set in motion where once a Democrat achieves a certain level of power they are immune from prosecution.
We have seen it play out in “Russiagate”, and now I hear how Hannity says that the Republicans control the house, the clear evidence on Hunter’s laptop implicating Bidet, that his goose is cooked. I expect nothing to happen, other than possibly a mild charge for Hunter.
You fail to kill a virus, it just metasticizes and grows, with powerful people like Sukaturd meddling in elections and Soros seeding all of the AG races, we now live in a banana republic.