Kameltoe Couldn't Pass A Background Check

[TheAccountant]

She says she owns a gun, she also brags about being a pot smoker. I didn't make the laws or put the drug questions and warnings on the 4473, but they are what they are. She'll be the most anti-2nd amendment President in history, so enjoy the sh!t that's coming.

This is probably the most relevant post in the thread, not people's opinions.

Hmmmmm.... isn’t what you emphasized an opinion?

 

[cool arrow]

This is probably the most relevant post in the thread, not people's opinions.

Are you talking to me? NO.

(a)-We know she is anti-citizen owning firearms. Her phalanx she stands behind and herself are subject to a different standard of laws.

(b)-We can't vote her out, she wasn't even wanted by her own party who she deemed "RAYSIST" and was the first to concede.

(c)-I hope the orange man bad s*** bites them in the ass so bad they cant sit in a chair like a normal human being.

(d)-all of the above

 

[cool arrow]

She says she owns a gun, she also brags about being a pot smoker. I didn't make the laws or put the drug questions and warnings on the 4473, but they are what they are. She'll be the most anti-2nd amendment President in history, so enjoy the sh!t that's coming.

This is probably the most relevant post in the thread, not people's opinions.

Hmmmmm.... isn’t what you emphasized an opinion?

well played, Sir.

although, it isn't so much an opinion as an inevitable truth, as her speeches, debates, and voting history show

 

[Gunslinger808]

I agree with pale rider on this one.
She as an elected representative should be held to a higher standard, heck, if I had said I used marijuana I never would have passed a background check when I worked for Border Patrol or ICE.
Never mind that as an assistant attorney general in California she was responsible for putting drug users behind bars for doing the same thing she admits to.
And really, this is not about whether pot should be legal or not, this is about using liberal tactics against them, make them own it and answer for it.
Her two faced stance should at least be good for a few schadenfreude points.

 

[XJThrottle]

Maybe you should put your full name and address on this thread and admit that you've used dope and then we'll see how many government goons show up at your home to confiscate your guns and arrest you for lying on the 4473. Until you're willing to do that, shut your ridiculous mouth.

The answer is zero, BTW.

 

[TheAccountant]

I agree with pale rider on this one.
She as an elected representative should be held to a higher standard, heck, if I had said I used marijuana I never would have passed a background check when I worked for Border Patrol or ICE.
Never mind that as an assistant attorney general in California she was responsible for putting drug users behind bars for doing the same thing she admits to.
And really, this is not about whether pot should be legal or not, this is about using liberal tactics against them, make them own it and answer for it.
Her two faced stance should at least be good for a few schadenfreude points.

So CBP and ICE’s hiring policies do not permit any past use of marijuana?

 

[XJThrottle]

I agree with pale rider on this one.
She as an elected representative should be held to a higher standard, heck, if I had said I used marijuana I never would have passed a background check when I worked for Border Patrol or ICE.
Never mind that as an assistant attorney general in California she was responsible for putting drug users behind bars for doing the same thing she admits to.
And really, this is not about whether pot should be legal or not, this is about using liberal tactics against them, make them own it and answer for it.
Her two faced stance should at least be good for a few schadenfreude points.

So CBP and ICE’s hiring policies do not permit any past use of marijuana?

IIRC, it has more to do with how long ago it was.

I admitted use on my CBP application, and I got all the way to the polygraph test (took two years to get that far). The examiner failed me not because I had admitted use, but he thought I was trying to cheat the test.

 

[TheAccountant]

That’s my understanding as well and that’s why I asked the question.

 

[Gunslinger808]

Back in 83 when I first joined it was an instant DQ.
At least that’s what I was told.

 

[TheAccountant]

I’ll take your word for it, but if we’re going to pretend that things are the same today as they were 40 years ago then we might as well go back 100 years and be up in arms over her voting as well. There are a million valid reasons to despise the woman - it shouldn’t be too hard to find one that has some merit.

 

[Gunslinger808]

I in no way will defend that whore, and do anything I can to discredit her.
She’s a hypocritical bitch that uses her position in power to subjugate us.
She lied about being black, her parents owned slaves, she smoked dope and has a handgun, both offenses that she jailed others for, she wants us disarmed.
Fick her.

we might as well go back 100 years and be up in arms over her voting as well.

And yet she wants to blame and wants repatriation money from me for something that happened over 150 years ago?

 

[TheAccountant]

There you go. A reason to hate her that actually has some merit. That wasn’t too difficult.

 

[XJThrottle]

FWIW, my application to the CBP was a little over ten years ago. Not within the recent wave of weed becoming "legal" everywhere. Also, I was being straight with the examiner. He just didn't trust my heart rate, and breathing rate were so low.

 

[Cubiclerevolt]

This is probably the most relevant post in the thread, not people's opinions.

Are you talking to me? NO.

(a)-We know she is anti-citizen owning firearms. Her phalanx she stands behind and herself are subject to a different standard of laws.

(b)-We can't vote her out, she wasn't even wanted by her own party who she deemed "RAYSIST" and was the first to concede.

(c)-I hope the orange man bad s*** bites them in the ass so bad they cant sit in a chair like a normal human being.

(d)-all of the above

Right on, thank you for clarifying. I was like wait...im doing everything I can.

 

[Gunslinger808]

Back in 83 the issue was Reagan’s war on drugs was really cranking up, there was a zero tolerance policy and the DARE program as well as Nancy’s Just Say No crusade were in effect.
It was a different time for sure.

 

[Pale Rider]

THIS THREAD is already tiring...

It was at the initial post.

Powerlessness causes derangement in some more quickly than others.

I don't recall you, cool arrow, or the bean counter libtard troll being forced or even asked to come on this thread and comment. If you don't like the subject go back to the NRA thread and b!tch about them some more over there.

 

[cool arrow]

have we met?

if so, you probably have the right to be an a$$hole to me
if not, I will comment as I please.

 

[Pale Rider]

have we met?

if so, you probably have the right to be an a$$hole to me
if not, I will comment as I please.

You started it with your smart ass remark. No one is forcing anyone to comment or agree with my opinion, but disagreeing is one thing but acting like a smart ass is another.

 

[Pale Rider]

This is getting too vicious now , feel free to lock the thread, gunslinger.

 

[cool arrow]

WTF is your problem?!?

I phucking agreed with you. And as I said, I will comment as I please, if you don't like it, I DGAF.

Period, hard stop.

ETA: I have agreed with MANY of your posts, I don't know where your anger is coming from.