Kahr P380 vs Kimber 380 Micro

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Welcome! You have been invited by KraigSada to join our community. Please click here to register.

varnco

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2018
Messages
10
Location
Phoenix
I have been a happy owner of a Kahr P380 for about 4 or 5 years now, and like the gun a lot. I sometimes forget I have it.

I've been intrigued by the new Kimber Micro 380, but I really like the DAO (and no safety) on the Kahr. Not sure I'm a fan of 1)SA and 2)Safety.

Anyone every make a switch for your EDC from DAO to SA?

I just like the "safety" of DAO. I'd even like a DA/SA.
 
I switched from a Kahr PM9 to a Sig P220 SAO a few years back. Carrying cocked and locked seems no different to me than carrying a striker fired with the exception of teaching yourself to pop the safety off as the gun comes up on target. Just do a bunch of reps every day for a few days and you'll have it down pat.
 
I have both and i have never been comfortable with the single action in a pocket holster. That's just a mental thing for me. But with proper training i am sure either is safe. For me though i just won't carry it. More of a novelty in my mind. That said i don't carry the Kahr either. I always go back to the LCP for pocket carry.
 
It really depends on how many different guns you have. I have found that with too many different types of handguns, SA, DA/SA, DAO, I find myself unsure about my Kimber SA. Is the safe On or is it Off? types of thought enter my mind, so I am constantly checking it. With the DA/SA, I don't worry because it is a long and relatively heavy pull for the DA so I don't worry about a ND.
If I only had one handgun, I would not be concerned because I would know the gun better. When the gun is just one of many, that is when you can make a mistake and then you get to say :o "I thought it was safe...." after the ND. I only carry DA/SA on my person or in my vehicles. The SA's are for range use only. That's how I keep things safe.
 
I've always had a little worry wart in the back of my mind when carrying a 1911 cocked and locked. It's those unexpected incidents when least expected that gum things up.
I liked the S&W 3rd gen DA with decocker as you could have the hammer down on a chambered round and simple flip the decocker off like a safety then use DA.
Striker pistols are similar to having C&L, except most have a trigger safety - we've all heard how well that works and the ND's police seem to be prone to. That's one reason I chose the XD platform, trigger safety plus grip safety. I still use the the other systems, I just prefer the XD.
 
h8pvmnt said:
I have both and i have never been comfortable with the single action in a pocket holster. That's just a mental thing for me. But with proper training i am sure either is safe. For me though i just won't carry it. More of a novelty in my mind. That said i don't carry the Kahr either. I always go back to the LCP for pocket carry.

Agreed!

I have never gotten past the handling stage at the gun store counter, with a pocket pistol that has a thumb safety. I may have missed some, but, what I have handled just didn't have a thumb safety large enough for me to feel confident in hitting 100% of the time. I understand perfectly well that a pocket pistol with a protruding thumb safety is not productive, so I just passed on the whole idea, on all of them.

I have read opinions that the small/hard to disengage thumb safety doesn't have to be used/activated when carried. That to me is just stupid. I would be checking it even if I didn't activate it. Better to not have a thumb safety, than have one you don't use, imo.

I have a very compact kydex pocket holster that I modified, it replaces my need for a manual safety, quite nicely. It allows a chamber check and racking the slide/emptying the chamber, without ever exposing the trigger. I highly recommend it for any pocket pistol with, or without a thumb safety.

Here is a home page link with better price, temporary sale price $15!

http://www.boraii.com/
 
Back
Top