I am SO freaking sick of this!

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Welcome! You have been invited by digger2 to join our community. Please click here to register.

cool arrow

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2018
Messages
1,865
Location
Ajo
These damn cliffhanger news casters going on and on about the AZ elections...

Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Florida have had their results for days already, so WTF?!?

Just let us know how much we lost by, how it was all Trump's fault, and let us fret and bitch about how things used to be before the blue wave destroyed our state.

Dragging this all out is just making it seem even more dirty and corrupt, kinda like 2020, right?
 
I am being wildly optimistic and they will find fifteen thousand or so votes for Kari in the seat cushions. If nothing else there is some hope albeit small ... But yea .. How come Florida knew who won that night and we are still messing around
 
Well, the demoRAT sheriff set up a perimeter around the vote counting building this morning, heard it on the news driving in to work. Hmm, a Battle of Athens he was expecting???


Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde
 
Masters and Finchem are definitely done. Lake is hanging in there but things are trending the wrong way. In other great news, we’re adding yet another bureaucrat that’ll receive a decent salary and outrageous pension for doing nothing. Oh, and instead of deporting illegals, we’re going to make it cheaper for them to go to college here than a kid from a neighboring state. Amazing how all of these dipshits from blue states move here because their home state has become uninhabitable, and then they continue to vote for the same shit that ran them out of their home.

I’ve lived here my entire life and never really thought about moving because I didn’t want to live in some liberal cesspool, but now that Arizona has turned that way, it’s definitely made some other states look way more appealing. It might be time to make our second home our primary home.

It’s too bad that states can’t amend their constitution to disallow any person who has previously registered to vote in another state from participating in elections for representatives of the state. Basically, if you don’t like the way shit turned out in your home state, you don’t get to move and f*** up another state.
 
TheAccountant said:
Masters and Finchem are definitely done. Lake is hanging in there but things are trending the wrong way. In other great news, we’re adding yet another bureaucrat that’ll receive a decent salary and outrageous pension for doing nothing. Oh, and instead of deporting illegals, we’re going to make it cheaper for them to go to college here than a kid from a neighboring state. Amazing how all of these dipshits from blue states move here because their home state has become uninhabitable, and then they continue to vote for the same s*** that ran them out of their home.

I’ve lived here my entire life and never really thought about moving because I didn’t want to live in some liberal cesspool, but now that Arizona has turned that way, it’s definitely made some other states look way more appealing. It might be time to make our second home our primary home.

It’s too bad that states can’t amend their constitution to disallow any person who has previously registered to vote in another state from participating in elections for representatives of the state. Basically, if you don’t like the way s*** turned out in your home state, you don’t get to move and f*** up another state.


Uh, being former military, I really didn't have much of a choice.

Clyde
 
kenpoprofessor said:
Uh, being former military, I really didn't have much of a choice.

Clyde

That’s the point. You didn’t have a vested interest in the state-level politics, so you shouldn’t have a say in what goes on.
 
TheAccountant said:
kenpoprofessor said:
Uh, being former military, I really didn't have much of a choice.

Clyde

That’s the point. You didn’t have a vested interest in the state-level politics, so you shouldn’t have a say in what goes on.


Wow man. That’s a pretty bold statement saying vets/military don’t have a vested interest in the state they were PCS’d to. As Clyde said we didn’t have a choice of state, country, or combat zone we were in. To say he or any other person living temporarily in a state of the US has no vested interest is an absolute idiotic statement. Good day “accountant”
 
TheAccountant said:
It’s too bad that states can’t amend their constitution to disallow any person who has previously registered to vote in another state from participating in elections for representatives of the state. Basically, if you don’t like the way s*** turned out in your home state, you don’t get to move and f*** up another state.

Watch what you wish for. I came from a solid Blue state (NY) but brought my Republican votes with me and it would seem, based on the last two elections, that AZ can use all the Red votes it can get. I may soon bring them to Florida.
 
Boriqua said:
Watch what you wish for. I came from a solid Blue state (NY) but brought my Republican votes with me and it would seem, based on the last two elections, that AZ can use all the Red votes it can get. I may soon bring them to Florida.

We need all of the red votes we can get because you’re in the minority of what comes here from other states. If eliminating your one red vote for governor also eliminated 1.5 blue votes for governor then we would be better off. It’s not like the politics of the state aren’t known before they make the move. If a person agrees with them, great, if they don’t, then they can either live with them or pick a different state.

xarmtdawg said:
Wow man. That’s a pretty bold statement saying vets/military don’t have a vested interest in the state they were PCS’d to. As Clyde said we didn’t have a choice of state, country, or combat zone we were in. To say he or any other person living temporarily in a state of the US has no vested interest is an absolute idiotic statement. Good day “accountant”

A vested interest implies some level of permanence. A personal stake. Some skin in the game. I’m not quite sure how a person who was forced to move to a state and will likely be forced to move away from that state really clears that hurdle. If they do, then by all means, register and vote in that state.

The point is that elections have implications well beyond the term a person is elected for. If you want to have a say in those decisions, then you should also be around to feel the long term impact of them. I’m not sure what you find so bold or off putting about that, “dawg.”
 
TheAccountant said:
Boriqua said:
Watch what you wish for. I came from a solid Blue state (NY) but brought my Republican votes with me and it would seem, based on the last two elections, that AZ can use all the Red votes it can get. I may soon bring them to Florida.

We need all of the red votes we can get because you’re in the minority of what comes here from other states. If eliminating your one red vote for governor also eliminated 1.5 blue votes for governor then we would be better off. It’s not like the politics of the state aren’t known before they make the move. If a person agrees with them, great, if they don’t, then they can either live with them or pick a different state.

xarmtdawg said:
Wow man. That’s a pretty bold statement saying vets/military don’t have a vested interest in the state they were PCS’d to. As Clyde said we didn’t have a choice of state, country, or combat zone we were in. To say he or any other person living temporarily in a state of the US has no vested interest is an absolute idiotic statement. Good day “accountant”

A vested interest implies some level of permanence. A personal stake. Some skin in the game. I’m not quite sure how a person who was forced to move to a state and will likely be forced to move away from that state really clears that hurdle. If they do, then by all means, register and vote in that state.

The point is that elections have implications well beyond the term a person is elected for. If you want to have a say in those decisions, then you should also be around to feel the long term impact of them. I’m not sure what you find so bold or off putting about that, “dawg.”

Well “accountant” what is your definition of time for permanence? Is there a set amount of time, do you have to be born in such State, are you saying non-lifetime residents can’t vote in the state they live in because they might not stay their whole life? I’m not trying to get in a pissing match, but residents of whatever state they choose or are living, stationed, etc. Still have the right to vote. The long term impact really has no relevance. Because in the whole scope of things, voting is an Americans civil right and duty no matter where they reside.
 
xarmtdawg said:
Well “accountant” what is your definition of time for permanence? Is there a set amount of time, do you have to be born in such State, are you saying non-lifetime residents can’t vote in the state they live in because they might not stay their whole life? I’m not trying to get in a pissing match, but residents of whatever state they choose or are living, stationed, etc. Still have the right to vote. The long term impact really has no relevance. Because in the whole scope of things, voting is an Americans civil right and duty no matter where they reside.

If a person wants to vote in state elections, then they register in that state. It could be a day or it could be 10 years depending on what that person chooses. The point being that you get one shot to influence how a state operates.
 
cool arrow said:
These damn cliffhanger news casters going on and on about the AZ elections...

Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Florida have had their results for days already, so WTF?!?

Just let us know how much we lost by, how it was all Trump's fault, and let us fret and b**** about how things used to be before the blue wave destroyed our state.

Dragging this all out is just making it seem even more dirty and corrupt, kinda like 2020, right?

Maybe if our State “leaders” only had the balls to stand up to it.

DeSantis video in link

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/flashback-gov-ron-desantis-on-what-makes-a-good-leader-on-tucker-carlson-today/vi-AA13WEtN
 
OK My 2 cents. Military on active duty get to vote in the state their based in OR wherever they want. They don't get a choice of where they are stationed.
After they get out, the vote like a local. Anyone else has to be in their location for a year and a day to vote in the state where they are living. That way they can't vote in a blue state in the morning and then go to a nearby state saying they changed their residence on voting day. And vote blue!
Just my $ .02
 
I forgot one other point. If you are on welfare, you don't get a vote. You are sucking the tit of the government and want to continue to suck, just like a democrat, ruining our country.
 
Ever consider it's not just the voters, though the candidates.

AZ as known has more Rep than Dems registered to vote, therefore just voting by party Rep should be ahead.

As of this morning only 1 Rep is holding a huge lead Kimberly Yee, my guess is because she's a solid candidate for the position, reason I voted for her.
Screenshot 2022-11-13 at 12-02-15 Arizona Election Results.png


Screen Shot 2022-11-13 at 11.59.03 AM.png
Here's the numbers of registered Rep to vote and candidate votes per county, Yee actually got more votes in Pinal than registered Rep.

Though I may have an IQ of a potato according to [mention]TheAccountant[/mention] & [mention]kenpoprofessor[/mention], my crazy thought is have candidates that will get votes from the registered Rep voters. Not hard to see even from a person that may have an IQ of a potato, which is proven to be more than rocks ;)
 
FIX IS IN: Arizona Ballots Make Stop at Runbeck Printing Company to Scan Ballot Envelopes Before They Are Sent to County — WITH NO OBSERVERS



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/fix-arizona-ballots-make-stop-runbeck-printing-company-scan-ballot-envelopes-sent-county-no-observers/


https://twitter.com/BenBergquam/status/1590939018824683521?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1590939018824683521%7Ctwgr%5Ec79fda2500e7aff7d649ef85b5bd745991317797%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2022%2F11%2Ffix-arizona-ballots-make-stop-runbeck-printing-company-scan-ballot-envelopes-sent-county-no-observers%2F
 
hudsguns said:
AZ as known has more Rep than Dems registered to vote, therefore just voting by party Rep should be ahead.

Explain how receiving 34% of the vote in a two-candidate race puts one candidate ahead.

hudsguns said:
Not hard to see even from a person that may have an IQ of a potato, which is proven to be more than rocks ;)

You finally got something right - I drastically overstated your intelligence by comparing you to a potato.
 
TheAccountant said:
hudsguns said:
AZ as known has more Rep than Dems registered to vote, therefore just voting by party Rep should be ahead.

Explain how receiving 34% of the vote in a two-candidate race puts one candidate ahead.

hudsguns said:
Not hard to see even from a person that may have an IQ of a potato, which is proven to be more than rocks ;)

You finally got something right - I drastically overstated your intelligence by comparing you to a potato.

34% doesn't start out with an advantage over Dems then just need to persuade a few of the non-party voters.

AZ GOP had good candidates, but the minimal thinkers voted them out during primary. Now those same voters can't believe what's happening. Rather than blame some machines, media, weather, people moving from other states, or just the complaint of moment, take a look at the candidates, most likely the loss is due to a bad candidates.

The Trumpicans (e.g. Lake, Masters, Finchem, Hamadeh) are beyond bad they're pathetic candidates.

Since your so smart you should have seen the numbers from primary showed that Lake would need ~70% of the voters for Taylor Robson, if you didn't, I think we might have overstated your intelligence.

Oh well, maybe next time.
 
hudsguns said:
TheAccountant said:
hudsguns said:
AZ as known has more Rep than Dems registered to vote, therefore just voting by party Rep should be ahead.

Explain how receiving 34% of the vote in a two-candidate race puts one candidate ahead.

hudsguns said:
Not hard to see even from a person that may have an IQ of a potato, which is proven to be more than rocks ;)

You finally got something right - I drastically overstated your intelligence by comparing you to a potato.

34% doesn't start out with an advantage over Dems then just need to persuade a few of the non-party voters.

AZ GOP had good candidates, but the minimal thinkers voted them out during primary. Now those same voters can't believe what's happening. Rather than blame some machines, media, weather, people moving from other states, or just the complaint of moment, take a look at the candidates, most likely the loss is due to a bad candidates.

The Trumpicans (e.g. Lake, Masters, Finchem, Hamadeh) are beyond bad they're pathetic candidates.

Since your so smart you should have seen the numbers from primary showed that Lake would need ~70% of the voters for Taylor Robson, if you didn't, I think we might have overstated your intelligence.

Oh well, maybe next time.

Oh, so it’s not “just voting by party” that puts the candidate ahead? Good to know, considering that’s not what you said originally. Before casting judgment on my intelligence, maybe you should repeat 1st grade and learn the difference between “your” and “you’re.”
 
Back
Top