Tenring
Member
What company makes the safety for the Glock back plate, trying to find one for a friend. While holstering you can hold it down and not allow the gun to fire.
Thanks for any reply
Thanks for any reply
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tenring said:What company makes the safety for the Glock back plate, trying to find one for a friend. While holstering you can hold it down and not allow the gun to fire.
Thanks for any reply
brandyspaw said:When these first came out it kind of reminded me of Colonel Cooper's old saying "an ingenious solution to a non-existent problem". He coined that to voice his disdain for the DA autoloaders since he always advocated the 1911 platform. Cooper's position was that, with proper training, a SA 1911 carried cocked and locked is as safe as any of the DA designs. The Glock is the same way.
However, looking into them I found the only negative (other than cost, of course) is the possibility of crud entering into the striker area with the device being open like that. I think if I were to carry Glock's for defense purposes (instead of my ancient SIG DA/SA autos) I'd consider them. If it gives you peace of mind when holstering, why not? After all, despite all the training, sometimes sh*t happens.
https://youtu.be/Bz7xYMChXjo
Doc said:Why not just carry it without one in the chamber?
This is a real question. Not trolling.
Tenring said:Yes - why not.
I always ask the experts that say, my finger is my safety ..... if they remove the safety off their AR and other firearms also because their finger is so smart. Personally, I no longer own any Glocks, there are just too many better and safer options to choose from.
and if you want to take the chance it's your choice, after all you own every bullet fired from the firearm.
Fact is everyone makes mistakes, I have seen Master Class Shooters, guys that I have shot with for 30+ years make mistakes, including myself, it happens. Anyone who says they never make a mistake and never will is lying/just not honest with themselves, so why not use every advantage you can to be safe.
Thanks for the replies everyone.
Tenring said:Doc said:Why not just carry it without one in the chamber?
This is a real question. Not trolling.
It depends on what caliber and type of lube used on the firearm.
Boriqua said:Tenring said:Yes - why not.
I always ask the experts that say, my finger is my safety ..... if they remove the safety off their AR and other firearms also because their finger is so smart. Personally, I no longer own any Glocks, there are just too many better and safer options to choose from.
and if you want to take the chance it's your choice, after all you own every bullet fired from the firearm.
Fact is everyone makes mistakes, I have seen Master Class Shooters, guys that I have shot with for 30+ years make mistakes, including myself, it happens. Anyone who says they never make a mistake and never will is lying/just not honest with themselves, so why not use every advantage you can to be safe.
Thanks for the replies everyone.
If your buddy gets it be sure to come back to tell us what he/you think of it.
With any regular hip/leg holster, your muzzle is pointed down, and the device remains closed under gravity. It only 'open's when the striker moves to the rear, which is when something is depressing the trigger. If that's something that doesn't belong in the trigger guard, and your thumb is on the device, you get the tactile feedback to STOP holstering!brandyspaw said:.... the only negative .. is the possibility of crud entering into the striker area with the device being open like that.
kenpoprofessor said:... this device might become an impediment to you having to make that one bang that saves your life.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.