Get the Jab or You're Fired
- Thread starter A_C Guy
- Start date
Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!
Join today!
Dauph said:
Now that we live in a totally emotional world devoid of critical thinking, those idiots have given me an emotional reason to give them a stiff middle finger.
I don't need the crap they are dishing out and calling education
I retired so screw their work
I can get anything I want delivered, in some cases in less time than driving to get it and much less A-holes involved
And let anyone try to stop me from having access to my children or grandchildren and I will have some real fun. Other people's children Lozem Gain.
I appreciate the employers response, but this thread is about forcing someone to take the shot.
If the requirements of employment are to take the shot, it falls on the employee to except it or look elsewhere.
If the employee was hired without shot requirements and then the employer requires shots after his employment changes the game.
It doesn't seem that the employee is not demanding any special treatment from the company. The employee is only demanding that he is not forced to get something pumped into his body that he doesn't want.
If the employer still demands, that's where I say, astalabyby.
If the requirements of employment are to take the shot, it falls on the employee to except it or look elsewhere.
If the employee was hired without shot requirements and then the employer requires shots after his employment changes the game.
It doesn't seem that the employee is not demanding any special treatment from the company. The employee is only demanding that he is not forced to get something pumped into his body that he doesn't want.
If the employer still demands, that's where I say, astalabyby.
oldslurrydog1 said:
Working in the businesses I did, the requirements changed all the time and if you wanted to keep a job you had to keep up with it.
Bottom line for me is that if I owned a company now and I had to have vaccinated employees to get work, I'd demand they get vaccinated.
OTOH, if I could get work without vaccinated employees, I wouldn't demand it.
oldslurrydog1 said:
This is no different than an employer telling employees that they can not smoke; not any where or anytime. It infringes on their personal choice.
Some people may try to equate to drug testing. Many companies lost employees when drug testing was introduced. The difference I see is that drug testing was proven to provide a safer work environment.
There is no such proof that the vaccine will protect anyone. There are numerous side effects from each of the vaccines. Pfizer's own report to the FDA says it will cause ovarian cancer and leukemia.
What about the people that are naturally immune? Are they also going to be required to get a vaccine that they clearly do not need?
I have no dog in this fight, so I don’t care but thinking out loud:
The fed is not liable, the drug company isn’t liable;
If an employer forces existing employees to get shot and one dies, is the company liable for all future potential earnings?
Will the employer have to get liability insurance to cover this?
The fed is not liable, the drug company isn’t liable;
If an employer forces existing employees to get shot and one dies, is the company liable for all future potential earnings?
Will the employer have to get liability insurance to cover this?
YNOTAZ said:
one needs to consider the next to last comment, with the decision of a judge in comi land to allow S & W to be sued for some deaths, if found that S&W is culpable, then the precendent is set and companies will be held liable for loss ect.
and i believe even now regardless of that law suit, some will still sue company just because of possible settlement to get away from a long litigation by insurance companies
rj
Similar threads
Share this page
