Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Flab fu!Razai said:I made it about six seconds, and then the floppy gut ran me off…
Young guy guilty of assault/battery. Heavy guy guilty of agg assault/assault /threatening/ endangerment, whatever level the prosecutor feels like trying. The standard is not "some fear," but "immediately necessary to prevent another's use of deadly force." He drew down to avenge bruised ego, not because it was immediately necessary to save his life.zonie77 said:It looked like that both or neither should be charged. I'm not a cop, just making an observation. The young guy hit the heavy guy and knocked him down, put some fear in the heavy guy. If I'm wrong tell me why.
I was surprised the article didn't say the young gun was charged. I found that strange.smithers599 said:Young guy guilty of assault/battery. Heavy guy guilty of agg assault/assault /threatening/ endangerment, whatever level the prosecutor feels like trying. The standard is not "some fear," but "immediately necessary to prevent another's use of deadly force." He drew down to avenge bruised ego, not because it was immediately necessary to save his life.zonie77 said:It looked like that both or neither should be charged. I'm not a cop, just making an observation. The young guy hit the heavy guy and knocked him down, put some fear in the heavy guy. If I'm wrong tell me why.
Still, a smart prosecutor would simply say "Get these knuckleheads out of here. What a couple of dumbasses." In fact, the appropriate charge is probably second degree dumbassery.
Suck My Glock said:Right or wrong, one thing this should tell all of us is that part of your self-defense training needs to focus on weapon retention. Especially for us fat tubby lardasses who can't run away if we get disarmed, or run away to avoid having to pull it out. Being legally able to stand you ground doesn't mean much unless you can maintain dominance over it.
And also from a moral and legal perspective, there is an element of liability if you cannot retain your weapon. If you are too easily disarmed, you are not an asset,...you are a liability. If you cannot dominate your space,...don't be there.
kenpoprofessor said:Suck My Glock said:Right or wrong, one thing this should tell all of us is that part of your self-defense training needs to focus on weapon retention. Especially for us fat tubby lardasses who can't run away if we get disarmed, or run away to avoid having to pull it out. Being legally able to stand you ground doesn't mean much unless you can maintain dominance over it.
And also from a moral and legal perspective, there is an element of liability if you cannot retain your weapon. If you are too easily disarmed, you are not an asset,...you are a liability. If you cannot dominate your space,...don't be there.
You know, I keep telling people that sort of thing, but, they don't listen, they're "invincible" because they have a gun.
Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day
Clyde
It seems we have fewer and fewer smart prosecutors, even with videos.smithers599 said:Young guy guilty of assault/battery. Heavy guy guilty of agg assault/assault /threatening/ endangerment, whatever level the prosecutor feels like trying. The standard is not "some fear," but "immediately necessary to prevent another's use of deadly force." He drew down to avenge bruised ego, not because it was immediately necessary to save his life.zonie77 said:It looked like that both or neither should be charged. I'm not a cop, just making an observation. The young guy hit the heavy guy and knocked him down, put some fear in the heavy guy. If I'm wrong tell me why.
Still, a smart prosecutor would simply say "Get these knuckleheads out of here. What a couple of dumbasses." In fact, the appropriate charge is probably second degree dumbassery.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.