Do I need multiples of the same gun?

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Register Log in
R

Roneyj

Member
Joined
May 24, 2018
Messages
72
Location
Gilbert
First let me say I do not think that we are headed for a SHTF scenario. However I have been thinking about my collection lately. I have several firearms that where handed down and have sentimental value. I have some that are always in the trading pool. I also have some that I have deemed essential. For example I have a Glock 19 that I practice with and will probably always keep on hand. My question is should I have more than one? If something did happen and I felt the need to gear up and leave town would there be a benefit in being able to give my wife the exact same weapon? She has been shooting but, is not what I would call efficient. Being able to share ammo, magazines, holsters.... seems beneficial. This is important because I really want to get a HK USP compact but, wouldn't be unhappy with another Glock 19. Thoughts?
 
The more consolidated your pistols or firearms are , to me personally? I dig it. Less confusion and you can have a gazillion mags and you dont have to worry about it. I've consolidated to 3 types of ammo. 9mm, .223 and 12 gauge. Everyone has it. Glocks especially.
 
My family has one of each gun for each family member. Magazines are interchangeable, same ammo for whole family. Each has their own AR, handgun, and .22 rifle/handgun as well. Multiples are good in my opinion.
 
diversity in ammo, platforms, brands and knowledge and never shy from information on skills, gleen what you can when you can, use what works, and continue to collect, store and learn.
survival, make it priority for one and all around you
Rj
 
I can see the benefit of consolidating into a single caliber for handguns and a single caliber for rifles, but at the same time there are advantages to having several different calibers. As anyone who has been out looking for ammo in the last few weeks can tell you most of the really popular calibers (9mm, 45acp, .40, .357. .223, ect) are completely gone while some of the slightly less popular calibers (.41 mag, .44 special, etc) are still available. Also if things got really bad as in a complete SHTF scenario and the only way to get ammo is to salvage it then having a variety of calibers might give you better odds of finding something that one of your guns can shoot.
 
There is an old say that "two is one and one is none". If life permits you to have multiples of your favorite/go to/best shooting firearm then it is always a good idea to do so.

$0.02
 
AZ1182 said:
As for this topic and in regards to an EDC, I'd say that having a backup just in case the primary goes down for whatever reason, is a smart thing to do.
Click to expand...

Not just that but if you also have to use your primary EDC in a defensive situation you can kiss it goodbye for a while. At least this way you have a backup that you are familiar with carrying and already have all the accessories such as holsters, mags, etc.
 
If not a duplicate then a smaller or larger version. The same mechanics and parts are usually there. Like the grip angle and the ability to use the same mags. Think Glock double stack 9mms or M&Ps the same way. But make sure that the generations are close to the same. I have some gen 3 glock mags that don't work in a gen 5.
 
TacMedic said:
My family has one of each gun for each family member. Magazines are interchangeable, same ammo for whole family. Each has their own AR, handgun, and .22 rifle/handgun as well. Multiples are good in my opinion.
Click to expand...

Similarly equipped with my family. :D
 
The best source of spare parts is another gun. Also, it is nice to have a clean one ready when you have just been to the range and mags stay interchangeable.
 
It is also easier to will once you die as you young ones will not feel cheated as they all get the same gun.
 
And I thought maybe the idea of multiples was overkill. Looks like it is more common than I thought. I guess I need to go shopping.
 
I keep multiples of all the guns I have carried, do carry and might in the future.

I also keep multiples of ARs.
 
I remember when I had one 1911, I was 27 years old. Now I am up to 22 of them along with multiple Hk USPs and doubles of Glock 30s's and of course our beloved AR's are up to 5 with a 6th being built now.

Not sure if you need multiples, but I found myself having multiples and being just fine with it.

I got tricked into the while one is none thing apparently, ha!
 
For everything? No. For essentials, it helps and simplifies keeping it available. Having spare parts is also simplified.
I bet most of us have guns we keep as collectors or just because they are cool. :D
 
for me I do own more then one hand gun per caliber but also try to have a long gun in that caliber. That being said anyone here try the new Ruger pcc in 40 S&W
 
doubletapp said:
for me I do own more then one hand gun per caliber but also try to have a long gun in that caliber. That being said anyone here try the new Ruger pcc in 40 S&W
Click to expand...

That long gun/caliber thing is great idea and very handy. In the late 90's I wanted a PC9 or PC40 Ruger soooo bad to go with some Ruger pistols I had. I have never experienced the carbines old or new myself to this day though and don't have those Ruger pistols any longer. :cry:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top