Demand Daniel

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Flash said:
Hunter said:
What's the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

You guys all kill me. You're like a bunch of beat down slaves trying to keep the master happy. The Republican party keeps giving you weak, neo liberal candidates.........Because YOU won't leave the plantation.

A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil.

I love bumper sticker logic because it's simple, to the point, and self evident. I have no idea who this Daniel guy is, but I do know an upset loss for the GOP anointed candidate in the primary will get noticed. Maybe next cycle the choices are better, then again maybe not.

But because the GOP has refused to do anything about commie control of the schools, welfare programs, borders, needless wars, runaway spending and a host of other problems.....we're going hard left for the foreseeable future. Better get use to it.

The GOP hasn't refused to do anything about these things, they simply can't get enough votes to get the legislation passed.

Big difference.

Since you don't believe in voting for the lesser of two evils, who do you vote for? If it's a libertarian, then it's a vote for Democrats.

So lets be clear. We gave the Republicans the White House and a majority in the House and Senate in 2016. They got f*** all done in from 2016-2018. Mostly because of RINOs like McCain.

And for those of you who can't do math voting for a Libertarian or Green or some other Party is not the same as voting for a Democrat. It gets counted as a vote for that party.
 
Tim McBride said:
And for those of you who can't do math voting for a Libertarian or Green or some other Party is not the same as voting for a Democrat. It gets counted as a vote for that party.

You obviously don't understand what was meant by my comment so I'll clarity it.

A vote for a Libertarian is a vote that wasn't cast for a Republican but was cast for a candidate who had absolutely no chance of winning.

Therefore, it is essentially the same thing as voting for a Democrat as it's one less for the Republican.
 
Flash said:
Tim McBride said:
And for those of you who can't do math voting for a Libertarian or Green or some other Party is not the same as voting for a Democrat. It gets counted as a vote for that party.

You obviously don't understand what was meant by my comment so I'll clarity it.

A vote for a Libertarian is a vote that wasn't cast for a Republican but was cast for a candidate who had absolutely no chance of winning.

Therefore, it is essentially the same thing as voting for a Democrat as it's one less for the Republican.
Lets say
10,000 people vote for the democrat
9,999 vote for the republican
2 vote Libertarian

Who's fault is it the R candidate lost?
The 2 Libertarians or the 10,000 Democrats?
 
Tim McBride said:
Lets say
10,000 people vote for the democrat
9,999 vote for the republican
2 vote Libertarian

Who's fault is it the R candidate lost?
The 2 Libertarians or the 10,000 Democrats?
As long as you can live with the consequences of a Democratic victory, vote your conscience. If not, it's a flaw in your reasoning?
 
Flash said:
Tim McBride said:
And for those of you who can't do math voting for a Libertarian or Green or some other Party is not the same as voting for a Democrat. It gets counted as a vote for that party.

You obviously don't understand what was meant by my comment so I'll clarity it.

A vote for a Libertarian is a vote that wasn't cast for a Republican but was cast for a candidate who had absolutely no chance of winning.

Therefore, it is essentially the same thing as voting for a Democrat as it's one less for the Republican.

I, we, understand what you're saying, but your logic is flawed. Let's start with the obvious. What makes you think a libertarian would vote Republican in the first place? It's surely not fiscal responsibility. I surely isn't privacy. Individual rights, not a chance. I could type till I'm blue in the finger and not touch all the wrongs Republicans are responsible for. Their waste, fraud and abuse is no different than the Democrats, it's just a matter of who gets the money I worked for the
 
Hunter said:
What's the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

You guys all kill me. You're like a bunch of beat down slaves trying to keep the master happy. The Republican party keeps giving you weak, neo liberal candidates.........Because YOU won't leave the plantation.

A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil.

I love bumper sticker logic because it's simple, to the point, and self evident. I have no idea who this Daniel guy is, but I do know an upset loss for the GOP anointed candidate in the primary will get noticed. Maybe next cycle the choices are better, then again maybe not.

But because the GOP has refused to do anything about commie control of the schools, welfare programs, borders, needless wars, runaway spending and a host of other problems.....we're going hard left for the foreseeable future. Better get use to it.

Insanity is wasting a vote on a no name that can't even say what church he goes to on his page. Already did that one on Perot and this election is way more important than that one.
 
It's obvious a lot of you guys haven't bothered to check McCarthy's website by the comments I'm reading here.

Take the time to check out his 'flyer link' on the homepage where he compares himself on the issues to Martha McCain, oops, McSally. You might be surprised what Martha has voted for.

Check Daniel's endorsement page with people like:

Michelle Malkin

Blogger, Fox News Contributor, Activist
_

David Farnsworth

Arizona State Senate (R - Dist. 16)
_

Russell Pearce

Former Arizona State Senator
_

Craig "Sawman" Sawyer

Marine Veteran, Former Navy SEAL, owner of Tactical Insider
_

Sheriff Richard Mack

Gun Right Activist, Arizona Sheriff
_

Actual conservatives!

Do you really think any of these people would endorse a RINO like Martha McCain, oops, McSally? Fat chance.

I get everyone's fear of Kelly, but let's face it at least McCarthy is a freakin' conservative and not a RINO. I think a true conservative will do better than a RINO in the general election

Some on this board and across the state has sworn to never vote for another RINO, that sounds like a plus for Kelly if he runs against Martha.

So at least take 5 minutes to check out his website before belittling a conservative like us.
 
338lapua said:
Hunter said:
What's the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

You guys all kill me. You're like a bunch of beat down slaves trying to keep the master happy. The Republican party keeps giving you weak, neo liberal candidates.........Because YOU won't leave the plantation.

A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil.

I love bumper sticker logic because it's simple, to the point, and self evident. I have no idea who this Daniel guy is, but I do know an upset loss for the GOP anointed candidate in the primary will get noticed. Maybe next cycle the choices are better, then again maybe not.

But because the GOP has refused to do anything about commie control of the schools, welfare programs, borders, needless wars, runaway spending and a host of other problems.....we're going hard left for the foreseeable future. Better get use to it.

Insanity is wasting a vote on a no name that can't even say what church he goes to on his page. Already did that one on Perot and this election is way more important than that one.

Did you watch the first video posted? It took McCarthy less than 36 seconds to CORRECTLY identify the BIGGEST problem facing this country. He gets my support for that reason alone. What church he goes to, how much dope he smokes, what size woman's dress he wears to the pride parade don't matter a bit.

And I'm glad you brought up Perot. Did he not correctly identify what would happen with all the wallstreet backed free trade agreements? Perot gave us Clinton, not because either of them were strong, but because Bush was so weak and lame. And if Congress had dropped the evil feature ban on Bush's desk, he would have signed it. We know that because of his EO banning "non sporting rifles"

And the "most important election ever" argument is just a lame excuse to keep doing the same thing over and over hoping for a different outcome. Is there anyone here who believes Mcsally WONT stab her base in the back? Anyone?
 
Tim McBride said:
Lets say
10,000 people vote for the democrat
9,999 vote for the republican
2 vote Libertarian

Who's fault is it the R candidate lost?
The 2 Libertarians or the 10,000 Democrats?

Interestingly enough, I was just going to use this exact same example.

The votes that put the Democrat over the top were Libertarian, so it's the Libertarians who elected the Democrat. It's the same as a vote where the Senate is tied in a vote for some bill and so the Vice President comes in and votes. He's the one who decided the issue, not the others who voted.

And it's the exact same thing that happened when the Senate was voting to get rid of Obamacare. McCain was the last vote and voted to keep it, so he was the one who decided the issue, not the others.
 
Flash said:
And it's the exact same thing that happened when the Senate was voting to get rid of Obamacare. McCain was the last vote and voted to keep it, so he was the one who decided the issue, not the others.

Yes and no.

True, McStain was the deciding vote, but if 3 or 4 others had voted against it, his yes vote would not have been a decider. We need to stack the deck as best we can to AVOID a one vote decision which is risky.
 
cool arrow said:
Flash said:
And it's the exact same thing that happened when the Senate was voting to get rid of Obamacare. McCain was the last vote and voted to keep it, so he was the one who decided the issue, not the others.

Yes and no.

True, McStain was the deciding vote, but if 3 or 4 others had voted against it, his yes vote would not have been a decider. We need to stack the deck as best we can to AVOID a one vote decision which is risky.

Ya, so let's all vote for the McCain prodigy, McSally so She can stab us in the back.

No, wait .....
 
baja said:
Ya, so let's all vote for the McCain prodigy, McSally so She can stab us in the back.

No, wait .....

So you have a crystal ball that tells you this ? After the Primary, where does MR Demand go ? He can't raise any big money (Which is going to be required to battle the space cadet). The National Republican party hasn't given him a plug nickel ? McConnell's Senate PAC is providing Millions $ to McSally, where will MR Demand get any big dollars to fund a full Television ad Blitz to get his name anywhere ?

Mr Demand maybe can walk the walk and talk the talk, but its $MONEY$ that locks elections up. He has shown over the last 1.5 years he can't gain any big $ support.

Show me where I'm wrong ?

But as a side note, McSally will probably lose this up coming election due to a large local group of Republicans which will throw their votes away because of their hate of McCain. I to Hated that bastard, but McSally is what our stupid state Republican party is supporting (Good bad or indifferent) it makes no difference since unless we go all in on the primary candidate that wins. With out that, its losing proposition.
 
Don't need a crystal ball to know she won't always vote as a conservative, all one has to do is check her voting record. Just like McCain she is only a conservative when she's running for office.

He doesn't get support now because he's not the incumbent. Whoever wins the Republican primary will get the full support of the party.

There has been at least a couple of upset wins in other states where actual conservatives have beat RINO incumbents that had Trumps support.

Conservatism is a winning hand, RINOism not so much.
 
Daniel hasn't had his name out there long enough for me for Democraps to dig up/make up dirt on him. This thread is the first I've heard of him.

With McSally we at least have some idea what's coming maybe good, maybe bad but at least she's "R". Between her and Kelly we are at the lesser of 2 evils again.

What happens if Daniel wins the primary and Soros minions go to work and make up something just way out there on him or actually find something provable, look at Kavanaugh...perfect example,they went all out on that one. I'd rather the man stick his neck out there for a longer period of time to see if someone will take a swat at it.
 
baja said:
Don't need a crystal ball to know she won't always vote as a conservative, all one has to do is check her voting record. Just like McCain she is only a conservative when she's running for office.

He doesn't get support now because he's not the incumbent. Whoever wins the Republican primary will get the full support of the party.

There has been at least a couple of upset wins in other states where actual conservatives have beat RINO incumbents that had Trumps support.

Conservatism is a winning hand, RINOism not so much.

And I bet Danial is a mormon and we all know how great they gave been in office. Remember Flake and Romney with their stellar records. Two of the people I hate the most in life are real estate agents and car salesmen which puts him on my list. guy is going nowhere and if you dumb asses get him on the November ballot thanks for electing the bald bozo as he will win.
 
Well, honestly, I don't think he has a chance beating McCain, oops, McSally in the primary.
But it's fun to think about Arizona actually having a conservative Senator.

Ya, right, I crack myself up.

Next chance ... 2 years.
 
baja said:
It's obvious a lot of you guys haven't bothered to check McCarthy's website by the comments I'm reading here.

Take the time to check out his 'flyer link' on the homepage where he compares himself on the issues to Martha McCain, oops, McSally. You might be surprised what Martha has voted for.

Check Daniel's endorsement page with people like:

Michelle Malkin

Blogger, Fox News Contributor, Activist
_

David Farnsworth

Arizona State Senate (R - Dist. 16)
_

Russell Pearce

Former Arizona State Senator
_

Craig "Sawman" Sawyer

Marine Veteran, Former Navy SEAL, owner of Tactical Insider
_

Sheriff Richard Mack

Gun Right Activist, Arizona Sheriff
_

Actual conservatives!

Do you really think any of these people would endorse a RINO like Martha McCain, oops, McSally? Fat chance.

I get everyone's fear of Kelly, but let's face it at least McCarthy is a freakin' conservative and not a RINO. I think a true conservative will do better than a RINO in the general election

Some on this board and across the state has sworn to never vote for another RINO, that sounds like a plus for Kelly if he runs against Martha.

So at least take 5 minutes to check out his website before belittling a conservative like us.

I looked at everything on his page and watched a interview he did where he comes off as a conceited little douchebag. We really don't know what he is as he is not elected and voting yet is he? He has no record other than what he spews out of his mouth. For all we know he is a extension of Flake or Romney and in it for himself. He comes off as a douche and I do not like him. If Kelly Ward was running I would vote for her but not for him.

I hate my own party probably more than most and how there is never any fresh blood but I don't fell it with him.
 
Ya, I'm not enamored with him either, but at least he's another choice to toss around.

For those who haven't checked the website, here's a graph that compares McCarthy and McCain, oops,McSally on the issues.
Remember Trump didn't have any political experience either.

Click on the image for a higher def view:

20200704_131248.jpg
 
And here's the audio of the James T. Harris interview with Daniel today (07/07/20):

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/960-conservative-circus-w-jame-28823469/episode/daniel-mccarthy-running-for-az-senate-67284180/?fbclid=IwAR2NXShdbOd2w5tDoMgWcpJw16RCpJcw2_xDfhZwmRdn4qC6iTrzF5rCh1k


Win with Conservative Daniel against Kelly

or

Lose with RINO McSally

It's up to us.
 
And, here's a poll showing McCarthy will do BETTER against Kelly than McCain, oops, McSally.

Let's vote for a conservative.

Click to read.

Screenshot_20200710-154009_Hancom Office Editor.jpg
 
Back
Top