CORRECTION Judge ALLOWS Sandy Hook/Remington Case

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

smithers599

Member
AZS Supporter - Bronze
Joined
Jun 29, 2018
Messages
4,926
Location
East side
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2016/10/14/connecticut-judge-dismisses-sandy-hook-massacre-lawsuit-against-remington/?fbclid=IwAR1FZX_wQzmW90POWVkfESE053zXwtm81tmlttmAMXVWu8TcB1Ofu-u3c6A#35c1d5934fc6

But naturally,
Attorney Joshua Koskoff of Koskoff & Bieder vowed to appeal the dismissal.

"While the families are obviously disappointed with the judge’s decision, this is not the end of the fight," he said in a prepared statement. "We will appeal this decision immediately and continue our work to help prevent the next Sandy Hook from happening.”
 
This doesn't pertain to the current lawsuit against Remington...the article is from October 2016.
 
QuietM4 said:
This doesn't pertain to the current lawsuit against Remington...the article is from October 2016.
I apologize. That's what I get for forwarding something without checking carefully first. The current lawsuit against Remington is very much alive and threatening.

https://www.sltrib.com/news/nation-world/[highlight=yellow]2019/03/14[/highlight]/newtown-shooting-families/
The gun industry suffered a stinging setback as Connecticut’s top court said families of victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre [highlight=yellow]could[/highlight] move ahead with their lawsuit against Remington Arms Co. over its marketing of military-style Bushmaster weapons.
In a first-of-its-kind decision, the state Supreme Court said the families could sue for "wrongful" marketing under a state unfair-trade practice law. The court, reinstating a suit dismissed by a trial judge in 2016, adopted the families' novel way around a federal law that protects the gun industry from liability.
 
It's interesting that they are attacking from a standpoint of "your advertisement makes people do bad things". I've seen a lot of firearm ads in my day, including creating some, and I have never seen an ad that could reasonably promote a school shooting. If this ever gets in front of a jury, I don't see this going well for the plaintiffs...no reasonable person should view any add as promoting shooting people.
 
They're just looking for deep pockets and a big payday. Hopefully Remington hangs in there and ends up collecting their own lawyer fees from the plaintiffs.
 
Back
Top