Charges Dropped Against First Kenosha Shooter Who Fired Into Air

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Suck My Glock

Member
Joined
May 25, 2018
Messages
10,579
Location
Peoria
https://concealednation.org/2020/10/charges-dropped-against-first-kenosha-shooter-who-fired-into-air/




On October 13, 2020, the Gateway Pundit broke the story that the person who fired the first shot the night Kyle Rittenhouse was forced to defend his life, Joshua Ziminski, was arrested and charged.

The man who fired the first shots from behind Kyle Rittenhouse during the fatal incident in Kenosha has been charged.

Joshua Ziminski, 35, has been charged with disorderly conduct and use of a dangerous weapon for firing his weapon during the incident on August 25.

On the face of it, that would appear to bolster Rittenhouse’s self-defense claim. He was being attacked at the time by Joseph Rosenbaum and someone fired a gun. Sane people would accepted that he had reasonable cause to fear for his life. Apparently the prosecutors think so as well.

The only charge that remains is disorderly conduct; the felony recklessly endangering safety charge for firing the handgun will not proceed. Having to argue in one case that Ziminski fired the first shot that night might have proved embarrassing while trying to prosecute the Rittenhouse case, where their story is that Kyle started all the trouble. So Ziminski’s inconvenient gun charge has simply gone away.

Also an oddity in the Ziminski situation: the lack of any charges for possession of a firearm. Per a Wisconsin Right Now report, Ziminski has multiple convictions for violating harassment orders, which may make him a prohibited person for domestic violence. He also has a 2005 marijuana conviction which definitely gave him prohibited status.

The Ziminski charging document, as seen above, makes it clear that not only do the police have video evidence of Ziminski in possession of a firearm, but Ziminski and his wife both admitted that he had a gun. Other people have been convicted of unlawful possession on weaker evidence, but the Wisconsin prosecutors cannot admit that a bad guy had and used a gun that night before Rittenhouse did.

It appears that the prosecutors prefer to let a violent criminal off rather than lose the chance to persecute Kyle Rittenhouse.
 
It's Progresses vs. Conservatives. Sooner or later it's going to come to a head.

When the law isn't for everyone, it's for no one and they might as well stop all prosecutions at that time. Perhaps we'll have to make them do that.
 
I'm not sure how much it means in the end. Sure the political games and bias make me ill but.... Not being a lawyer ... In the end I thought the only thing that mattered was the jury and they WILL see and hear evidence of the first guy shooting the handgun.

Sucks he won't go to jail or face at least a nice fine but I am not sure if it means jack to the Rittenhouse case.

By the by .. what is the penalty in az for say celebratory firing into the air say on the 4th?
 
cool arrow said:
this ruling can now be cited as precedent in upcoming unlawful possession charges AGAINST MARXISTS, BUT NOT AGAINST NORMAL AMERICANS.
Fixed it for you.
Two sets of rules.
 
action magic said:
Arizona Revised Statute 13-3107, Shannon's Law
This....
But hasn't it always been around?, they just decided to tie it to a stray bullet death case?
 
That doesn't mean he can't still be charged under federal statutes which are a lot harsher anyway. Minimum of 5 years.
 
Back
Top