California refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.

[shooter444]

I luv these self proclaimed political pundits that publish so profusely, as if to give the impression they are educated followers of the Constitution and, or, Human Rights,... when in actuality, they couldn't grasp the essence of these subjects, with both hands, if they were plastered on their arse!!!


[highlight=yellow]"In Virginia, anyone convicted of a state-level felony who has had his or her political rights restored by the Governor or other appropriate authority may petition the circuit court where they reside for restoration of their gun rights."[/highlight]


OK,... first, there is no such entity as [highlight=yellow]"political rights"[/highlight],.. there are Creator Endowed Unalienable Human Rights, and then there are Federal, State, and Local Government legislated PRIVILEGES.

Anyone,... ANYONE,...putting the word "political" and "rights" side by side in a sentence, are speaking from a relatively dark and remote orifice, primarily delegated to the task of excreting feces.

Second,... proof of their oration via the orifice I mentioned, is the ignorant statement that one must seek out the [highlight=yellow]"appropriate authority" for "restoration" [/highlight]of said RIGHT/S. Anyone of proper education knows that seeking out the authority which truly and actually endowed us with our unalienable human rights, is a fools folly,... second only to the fool claiming to have such authority under the guise of being ,... politically empowered.

Third,... Creator Endowed Unalienable Human Rights can not be "restored", because they can not be removed from a human being,... users of the term "removed" should take a moment and read the actual definition of the word UNALIENABLE! Maybe then they may acquire a clue to that of which they wish to pontificate upon, so authoritatively! If they were to do so, they would realize that Governments can only RESTRICT an individual's exercise of their Creator Endowed Unalienable Human Right/s,... but, under no means possible, can any entity on earth, remove a Creator Endowed Unalienable Human Right from a Human Being!!

"Unalienable | Definition of Unalienable at Dictionary.com

https://www.dictionary.com › browse › unalienable
adjective. not transferable to another or not capable of being taken away or denied; inalienable: Inherent in the U.S. Constitution is the belief that all people are born with an unalienable right to freedom."



Fourth,... RESTRICTION is not REMOVAL,... or, if some idiots may prefer, they may use a multitude of synonyms,... IE,... confine, constrict, minimalize, limit, control, regulate, reduce, curb, moderate,... etc, etc.

BUT,... REMOVAL IS INCORRECT,... because,.... it is IMPOSSIBLE!!!

Annnd lastly,... the use of the the word RIGHTS with the word GUN, are incongruent in nature. No where that I have researched, is owning a GUN specifically identified as a Creator Endowed Unalienable Human Right!!! One may retain the ownership of a GUN to exercise one's Right to protect Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness,... but,... in actuality, the protection of one's Creator Endowed Unalienable Human Right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness can be protected with any and ALL means of tools, objects, and weapons available to every human being!!!

And with that,... I will rest.

 

[Mauser98]

As if gun control even works at all.

 

[shooter444]

As if gun control even works at all.

Well, when one considers that GUN CONTROL leading to GUN CONFISCATION is their objective, and NOT PUBLIC SAFETY, one realizes it really isn't working very good for them,... since the USA is way behind in the One World Agenda of GUN CONFISCATION, as compared to their success around the rest of the world.

But they're working on it.

The only gigantic fly in their agenda at this time in history, is,... PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP,... and we should all vote to make sure he continues to do so.

 

[Mauser98]

As if gun control even works at all.

Well, when one considers that GUN CONTROL leading to GUN CONFISCATION is their objective, and NOT PUBLIC SAFETY, one realizes it really isn't working very good for them,... since the USA is way behind in the One World Agenda of GUN CONFISCATION, as compared to their success around the rest of the world.

But they're working on it.

The only gigantic fly in their agenda at this time in history, is,... PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP,... and we should all vote to make sure he continues to do so.

I agree. And actually I think the long term goal is to confiscate all white-owned land a la Rhodesia and South Africa.

 

[MarkItZero]

This thread had serious shades of leverman and gun carryin' kenpo days

 

[shooter444]

Ahhh, yes, nothing like starting the day off with coffee and adding another Ranger Danger alias to my foe/ignore list. :clap:

And the list just keeps on getting longer,... :dance:

17-21-23
Crippletrigger
HDS
Marine1
Ranger1
YNOTAZ
redj
smithers599
Steve_in_29
stomp442
MarkItZero..........and it only took you 2 weeks with your new alias

 

[MarkItZero]

This kook thinks 9/13/18 was 2 weeks ago

 

[shooter444]

I agree. And actually I think the [highlight=yellow]long term goal is to confiscate all white-owned land a la Rhodesia and South Africa.[/highlight]

I have been going over your statement above, again and again, but I can't quite get where you're coming from, in relation to Gun Control. But I put these thoughts together, in reply, anyway.

Rhodesia was a country of a black population, conquered and made a colony/possession of Great Britain for over 3/4 of a century until Great Britain's own Rhodesian resident white population basically through off Great Britain control, like we did. Now, the blacks of Rhodesia, basically the original native population, is reclaiming their country by throwing out the white population that did it to them in the first go-a-round. If memory serves me?

So, for me, to relate to your statement, I keep getting the vision that,... for a similar land grab, in line with the current Rhodesian land grab/race war/genocide movement, it would necessitate (for my thinking) that the North American original Native American population would have to be at the head of said land grab here in the US of A, pushing all, white/black/brown, etc., land owners back to where they came from.

I say this, looking strictly from a utopia type moral perspective, the Rhodesian political movement today, is in line with the acquiring and reacquiring cycle of countries/nations that has been going on forever. The main concern to most involved, is, which end of the stick you have a hold on, this go-a-round. . I don't like it, or dislike it, but, these types of historic happenings, barring outright war, is how all lands have been dealt with throughout history.

So, looking at the bigger picture,... I doubt that the white One World Government grabbers would be so race specific if a land grab agenda was on their to-do-list, as you have put it. I think they would take what ever land they want, no matter who owned it,... race not being an issue,... unless of course, using "race" would facilitate their agenda better!!!

jmo

 

[Flash]

Just as a quick aside, when Zimbabwe (Rhodesia now) was run by the white population, it was called "the breadbasket of africa."

Now, under black control, they can't even feed their own people. Almost all the farms are sitting unused and empty.

 

[Crippledtrigger]

Ahhh, yes, nothing like starting the day off with coffee and adding another Ranger Danger alias to my foe/ignore list. :clap:

And the list just keeps on getting longer,... :dance:

17-21-23
Crippletrigger
HDS
Marine1
Ranger1
YNOTAZ
redj
smithers599
Steve_in_29
stomp442
MarkItZero..........and it only took you 2 weeks with your new alias

I hope there is a check mark by my name. Just to put emphasis to the ignore.

Outting as leverman is apparently a ignore-able offense.

 

[shooter444]

Just as a quick aside, when Zimbabwe (Rhodesia now) was [highlight=yellow]run by the white population[/highlight], it was called "the breadbasket of africa."

Now, under [highlight=yellow]black control[/highlight], they can't even feed their own people. Almost all the farms are sitting unused and empty.

I believe the main reason they can't feed their people is,...

[highlight=yellow]"run by the white population"[/highlight] = free enterprise economic system

[highlight=yellow]"black control"[/highlight]= socialist/communist dictatorship

 

[redj]

Ahhh, yes, nothing like starting the day off with coffee and adding another Ranger Danger alias to my foe/ignore list. :clap:

And the list just keeps on getting longer,... :dance:

17-21-23
Crippletrigger
HDS
Marine1
Ranger1
YNOTAZ
redj
smithers599
Steve_in_29
stomp442
MarkItZero..........and it only took you 2 weeks with your new alias

I hope there is a check mark by my name. Just to put emphasis to the ignore.

Outting as leverman is apparently a ignore-able offense.

Apparently leverman thinks his posts are more relevant when he mentions his list.
He is obviously pretty proud of it.

 

[MarkItZero]

Casual lurking and 13 posts got me on the list, AFAIK leverman is the only one who has ever blocked me

Was the leverman handle banned?

 

[Crippledtrigger]

I'll PM you. I dont want a line thru my name on his list. I guess I would really be in trouble then.

 

[Mauser98]

I agree. And actually I think the [highlight=yellow]long term goal is to confiscate all white-owned land a la Rhodesia and South Africa.[/highlight]

I have been going over your statement above, again and again, but I can't quite get where you're coming from, in relation to Gun Control. But I put these thoughts together, in reply, anyway.

Rhodesia was a country of a black population, conquered and made a colony/possession of Great Britain for over 3/4 of a century until Great Britain's own Rhodesian resident white population basically through off Great Britain control, like we did. Now, the blacks of Rhodesia, basically the original native population, is reclaiming their country by throwing out the white population that did it to them in the first go-a-round. If memory serves me?

So, for me, to relate to your statement, I keep getting the vision that,... for a similar land grab, in line with the current Rhodesian land grab/race war/genocide movement, it would necessitate (for my thinking) that the North American original Native American population would have to be at the head of said land grab here in the US of A, pushing all, white/black/brown, etc., land owners back to where they came from.

I say this, looking strictly from a utopia type moral perspective, the Rhodesian political movement today, is in line with the acquiring and reacquiring cycle of countries/nations that has been going on forever. The main concern to most involved, is, which end of the stick you have a hold on, this go-a-round. . I don't like it, or dislike it, but, these types of historic happenings, barring outright war, is how all lands have been dealt with throughout history.

So, looking at the bigger picture,... I doubt that the white One World Government grabbers would be so race specific if a land grab agenda was on their to-do-list, as you have put it. I think they would take what ever land they want, no matter who owned it,... race not being an issue,... unless of course, using "race" would facilitate their agenda better!!!

jmo

I'm speculating but bear with me for a moment. Firearm ownership is much more common and popular in rural areas than in cities. And it is going to be difficult to take the land away from armed farmers. 96% of the land in America is white-owned. My prediction is that in 20 to 50 years the media will begin saying "why do whites, who are only 35% of the population, own 96% of the land?" It's not 35% yet but it will be. Then the government will propose "buy-back" and redistribution schemes.

I could be totally wrong about it, but that's the sense that I have.

Stage 1: Confiscate the firearms
Stage 2: Confiscate the land

 

[shooter444]

I'm speculating but bear with me for a moment. Firearm ownership is much more common and popular in rural areas than in cities. And it is going to be difficult to take the land away from armed farmers. 96% of the land in America is white-owned. My prediction is that in 20 to 50 years the media will begin saying "why do whites, who are only 35% of the population, own 96% of the land?" It's not 35% yet but it will be. Then the government will propose "buy-back" and redistribution schemes.

I could be totally wrong about it, but that's the sense that I have.

Stage 1: Confiscate the firearms
Stage 2: Confiscate the land

-----------------------------------------

I really don't know for a fact, but I will agree that, percentage wise, more rural citizens are probably armed,... but, I would have to assume there are more guns in the cities, just due to the population numbers. I think farmers have more of a threat from corporate entities, than government, if one can separate the two!

Again, I don't know how you got to the percentage of future white owned land, but, I think if one factors in Federal owned, State owned and Corporate owned land in the USA today, I doubt it leaves 96% of the USA for the private citizen purchase. And, as to your 35% white estimated future population figure, the last time I searched population by race, whites were at around 70% of the USA population, twice what you estimate for the future,... that's a whole lot of population shift in 20 to 50 years. You're talking about a reduction of around 150 million people, or more, in 20 years +! My guess is, all the deaths from genocide in the past fifty years, would not even come close to the 150 million estimate,... but, I could be wrong on that. The Nazi act of genocide on Jews, and probably the greatest genocide death toll in history, resulted in the death of approx. 6 million, just for comparison.

As to what the Federal/state/local Governments may do,... that will depend on if we remain a REPUBLIC or become a SOCIALIST Nation. Only VOTING will determine that!

On your last point,... I can't agree with you more,... GUN CONFISCATION will lead to land confiscation and anything else those with the guns want to confiscate,... including lives !!!