Buying used via FFL transfer

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Suck My Glock said:
I am normally in the same camp as the other commenters here, and still am.


But I want to thank pneuby for having a thick skin and an adult attitude and stepping forward to try to not only give us his perspective but also to keep it civil and friendly. We should all do that.

Also it sounds like he was forced to sign a notice of unlawful dealing in firearms. If that's the case, he essentially has to use an FFL or face real problems.
 
I'll pipe up.

I'm of the opinion that the private and lawful sale of goods should absolutely and always remain the business of private parties. I'm not super interested in any other party -- particularly one that has a three-letter acronym -- having any knowledge of what I own or how I conduct my own affairs.

That said, I'm a contractor. A large part of my worksite hygiene involves CYA. When I'm building to engineering drawings, unless I have explicit dispensation otherwise I will build *exactly* to drawings even if the final product is not what the client intended. When I work on or modify an existing structure, from a certain standpoint I "own" that structure and I will go out of my way to make sure that nobody else can non-obviously then change my construction or the substructure and blame any consequent problems on me.

If I want to buy a firearm and someone insists on an FFL because they're covering their own ass, well, that's their prerogative to do so and I won't hold it against them. If I elect to not use an FFL (either because of cost or personal reasons, well, that's also my own choice and nobody is forcing me to purchase anything from anybody.

I can sure respect a good CYA and wouldn't hold that action against someone.
 
Back
Top