Bump Fire Stocks Ban Coming Soon

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Welcome! You have been invited by Runner2020 to join our community. Please click here to register.
This seems like an appropriate time to rub this in,.....



p47vcCI.jpg
 
Tim McBride said:
Signed today, goes into effect 90 days after it's posted. Looks like it'll officially get posted Friday.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5635249/Bump-Stock-Final-Rule.pdf
So trump didn't sign it he had Whitaker do it. 157 pages of shit on this. It would have been the same outcome with Cruz or gay foam party boy Rubio or even Bush. As far as I am concerned anyone who works for the government is a traitor to this country. I'm sure people caught will be arrested for illegal machine guns by police.

The ruling is bullshit as it requires a pull of the trigger to fire a bullet along with a forward push which is still one bullet per pull and I just don't get that this is now a f***ing machine gun. Hell you can still bump fire with a finger and a forward push.

And again destroy your property with no payment or you are a felon, f*** this government. Hell we will never even get the truth on the Vegas shooting either which is far away from a single guy with a bump stock.
 
I guess everyone who bought a binary trigger had better get ready as I'm sure there will be some shooting with one of those next so they can get that too.
 
338lapua said:
Tim McBride said:
Signed today, goes into effect 90 days after it's posted. Looks like it'll officially get posted Friday.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5635249/Bump-Stock-Final-Rule.pdf
So trump didn't sign it he had Whitaker do it. 157 pages of s*** on this. It would have been the same outcome with Cruz or gay foam party boy Rubio or even Bush. As far as I am concerned anyone who works for the government is a traitor to this country. I'm sure people caught will be arrested for illegal machine guns by police.

The ruling is bullshit as it requires a pull of the trigger to fire a bullet along with a forward push which is still one bullet per pull and I just don't get that this is now a f*** machine gun. Hell you can still bump fire with a finger and a forward push.

And again destroy your property with no payment or you are a felon, f*** this government. Hell we will never even get the truth on the Vegas shooting either which is far away from a single guy with a bump stock.

Who ordered the DOJ to do it? Hint there are tons of videos of trump claiming credit that he ordered the justice department to do it and bypass congress

Why are you so adverse to facts? Why do you think people care about your false attacks with no basis other than your own imagination? If you think Ruby, Cruz, Hillary, etc are evil, why is it ok when trump acts like you suppose they act? Maybe that works for children, but adults look at that and say why defend someone who is no different than those you claim to hate?
 
Well I guess we will have to live with it unless its challenged in court. I'm not holding my breath for that to happen and come out saying the law is unconstitutional.
 
Joe_Blacke said:
338lapua said:
Tim McBride said:
Signed today, goes into effect 90 days after it's posted. Looks like it'll officially get posted Friday.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5635249/Bump-Stock-Final-Rule.pdf
So trump didn't sign it he had Whitaker do it. 157 pages of s*** on this. It would have been the same outcome with Cruz or gay foam party boy Rubio or even Bush. As far as I am concerned anyone who works for the government is a traitor to this country. I'm sure people caught will be arrested for illegal machine guns by police.

The ruling is bullshit as it requires a pull of the trigger to fire a bullet along with a forward push which is still one bullet per pull and I just don't get that this is now a f*** machine gun. Hell you can still bump fire with a finger and a forward push.

And again destroy your property with no payment or you are a felon, f*** this government. Hell we will never even get the truth on the Vegas shooting either which is far away from a single guy with a bump stock.

Who ordered the DOJ to do it? Hint there are tons of videos of trump claiming credit that he ordered the justice department to do it and bypass congress

Why are you so adverse to facts? Why do you think people care about your false attacks with no basis other than your own imagination? If you think Ruby, Cruz, Hillary, etc are evil, why is it ok when trump acts like you suppose they act? Maybe that works for children, but adults look at that and say why defend someone who is no different than those you claim to hate?

Why are you so adverse to the facts that Cruz and Rubio would have done the same f***ing thing? Who knows maybe you have a thing for gay foam party attendees in public office. Hillary would be the outright ban by now. America is toast anyway, with all the mexicans that are breeding like cockroaches as well as all the muslims that were let in within 25 years or less we will be out voted in every election and our country is gone to be replaced with mud.

I was hoping Trump would have done all the things he said he was going to do but when republicans put the ACA repeal on Obamas desk how many times and the one time they do it with Trump in office Mcshitstain votes to keep it. Hell there is another 10 billion in aid heading south and still no wall funding. I would really like to see him arrest and execute both the house and senate on the white house lawn for treason at this point

The thing nobody here is getting upset with is the fact that we will NEVER be told the truth about the Vegas shooting. That entire investigation is scam. Witnesses have been killed that survived the shooting but we will never hear the truth. Instead we get a bump stock ban to make the small minded people upset and over look the event that caused the ban.
 
I still think this is much-ado-about-noth'n,... and,... I would never say never about anything.

But, on a Constitutional point,... government confiscation, without compensation, is unconstitutional,... if memory serves me!

US Constitution - Fifth Amendment,...
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
 
shooter444 said:
I still think this is much-ado-about-noth'n,... and,... I would never say never about anything.

But, on a Constitutional point,... government confiscation, without compensation, is unconstitutional,... if memory serves me!

US Constitution - Fifth Amendment,...
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

This might be relevant. Back in 1981 when open bolt semis were declared to be MGs, there was no taking, they were grandfathered in. When StreetSweepers were made DDs, that was not a taking either, because you could simply enter it into the NFA registry. This is very different, since it appears to be the first time such a thing has been ordered destroyed or surrendered without ability to be transferred into the registry or compensated. Actually, no,...the Akins Accellerator was the first,...but it didn't have anyone challenge it in court.
 
,...but it didn't have anyone challenge it in court.


EXACTLY,... and, until someone does challenge this,.... the Globalist anti-gunners will do their best, to enforce it!

Where is the NRA ?
 
shooter444 said:
I still think this is much-ado-about-noth'n,... and,... I would never say never about anything.

But, on a Constitutional point,...


The Constitutional issue that most seem to be missing is the blatant upsurition of the power of the Legislative by unelected bureaucrats.
 
Tim McBride said:
shooter444 said:
I still think this is much-ado-about-noth'n,... and,... I would never say never about anything.

But, on a Constitutional point,...


The Constitutional issue that most seem to be missing is the blatant upsurition of the power of the Legislative by unelected bureaucrats.

Excellent point,... but, sometimes going the legal hoop jumping route, is the most simplest and effective coarse to take. I can only wonder how many blatantly unconstitutional laws and regulations are active at this point in time.

jmho
 
Back
Top