Biden’s Vaccine Mandate
- Thread starter Dauph
- Start date
Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!
Join today!
Tenring
Member
Unfortunately the Brandon administration has scared a lot of good people into getting the jab.
Tenring
Member
Just another reason to trust Brandon ..... FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-asks-federal-judge-to-grant-it
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-asks-federal-judge-to-grant-it
Suck My Glock
Member
Pfizer asks FDA to keep their data secret til 2076. Not the concoction, mind you. The safety and efficacy data supposedly supporting it. Treat it like the JFK assasination files?
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-asks-federal-judge-to-grant-it
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-asks-federal-judge-to-grant-it
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/official-public-health-england-data-says-covid-infection-rates-higher-vaxxd-unvaxxd
“Fresher information has fortified this conclusion of the summer. In every age group over 30 in the UK, the rates of Covid infection per 100,000 are now higher among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed. Indeed, in the cohorts aged between 40 and 79, infection rates among the vaccinated are more than twice as high as among the unvaccinated. PHE’s fruitlessly rechristened body, the UK Health Security Agency, frantically clarifies that the data ‘should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness’, a caveat which I include for the sake of accuracy. But the differences in the infection rates are drastic enough for you to draw your own conclusions.”
“Fresher information has fortified this conclusion of the summer. In every age group over 30 in the UK, the rates of Covid infection per 100,000 are now higher among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed. Indeed, in the cohorts aged between 40 and 79, infection rates among the vaccinated are more than twice as high as among the unvaccinated. PHE’s fruitlessly rechristened body, the UK Health Security Agency, frantically clarifies that the data ‘should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness’, a caveat which I include for the sake of accuracy. But the differences in the infection rates are drastic enough for you to draw your own conclusions.”
From the American Heart Association Journal itself:
Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Steven R Gundry
Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712
Abstract
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years.
Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Steven R Gundry
Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712
Abstract
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years.
Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
Tenring
Member
According to weekly mortality data from the British Government-
The brown line represents weekly deaths from all causes of vaccinated people aged 10-59, per 100,000 people.
The blue line represents weekly deaths from all causes of unvaccinated people per 100,000 in the same age range.
WHAT DOES THIS TELL YOU?
HOW IS THIS NOT GENOCIDE?
The brown line represents weekly deaths from all causes of vaccinated people aged 10-59, per 100,000 people.
The blue line represents weekly deaths from all causes of unvaccinated people per 100,000 in the same age range.
WHAT DOES THIS TELL YOU?
HOW IS THIS NOT GENOCIDE?
To add to the above:
The UK launched its Covid injection campaign on 8 December 2020 (https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths). According to the UK government’s ‘Deaths within 28 days of positive test by date of death’ there were 63,830 Covid deaths before the launch of the Covid injection roll-out. Since then, up to 10 November 2021, there has been 78,922 Covid deaths. There have been more Covid deaths post-Covid injection roll-out than before it began.
If the Covid injection was 90% effective in preventing death, why are “vaccinated” people currently dying at a ratio of 4,8:1 to “unvaccinated” people?
In a previous article (https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/16/are-the-fully-vaccinated-developing-covid-19-vaccine-induced-acquired-immunodeficiency-syndrome/) we wrote extensively about the real-world effectiveness of the Covid injections using VSR data over a three month period and the waning of effectiveness until it reverses and has the opposite effect. For week 45, everyone over the age of 30 shows a negative vaccine effectiveness – the “unvaccinated” are better protected against Covid than the “fully vaccinated.” The “vaccines” are destroying people’s immune systems – causing an immunodeficiency disorder, similar to AIDS, but vaccine-induced. The correlation is unequivocally clear but corporate media is not reporting it.
Anyone who propagates the mantra “the vaccine is safe and effective” is not being truthful. Anyone who encourages, coerces or forces an experimental medical procedure onto another is committing or aiding and abetting “wounding with intent.”
https://conservativedailypost.com/covid-death-rates-4-to-1-vaccinated-to-unvaxxed/
The UK launched its Covid injection campaign on 8 December 2020 (https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths). According to the UK government’s ‘Deaths within 28 days of positive test by date of death’ there were 63,830 Covid deaths before the launch of the Covid injection roll-out. Since then, up to 10 November 2021, there has been 78,922 Covid deaths. There have been more Covid deaths post-Covid injection roll-out than before it began.
If the Covid injection was 90% effective in preventing death, why are “vaccinated” people currently dying at a ratio of 4,8:1 to “unvaccinated” people?
In a previous article (https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/16/are-the-fully-vaccinated-developing-covid-19-vaccine-induced-acquired-immunodeficiency-syndrome/) we wrote extensively about the real-world effectiveness of the Covid injections using VSR data over a three month period and the waning of effectiveness until it reverses and has the opposite effect. For week 45, everyone over the age of 30 shows a negative vaccine effectiveness – the “unvaccinated” are better protected against Covid than the “fully vaccinated.” The “vaccines” are destroying people’s immune systems – causing an immunodeficiency disorder, similar to AIDS, but vaccine-induced. The correlation is unequivocally clear but corporate media is not reporting it.
Anyone who propagates the mantra “the vaccine is safe and effective” is not being truthful. Anyone who encourages, coerces or forces an experimental medical procedure onto another is committing or aiding and abetting “wounding with intent.”
https://conservativedailypost.com/covid-death-rates-4-to-1-vaccinated-to-unvaxxed/
Anyone see anymore on this?
https://gettr.com/post/phk2te888b
Arizona Sheriff Hathaway JamesDavid
Exposes AZ Governor dougducey & The Strings Attached To The Federal Covid $$$...
They Are Essentially Selling Your Info To The CDC To Build Their Database
https://gettr.com/post/phk2te888b
Arizona Sheriff Hathaway JamesDavid
Exposes AZ Governor dougducey & The Strings Attached To The Federal Covid $$$...
They Are Essentially Selling Your Info To The CDC To Build Their Database
Tenring
Member
Brandon Issues Another Vaccine Mandate for All Non-Resident Essential Workers
https://resistthemainstream.org/biden-issues-another-vaccine-mandate/?utm_source=telegram
https://resistthemainstream.org/biden-issues-another-vaccine-mandate/?utm_source=telegram
Here comes the ACLU for all the non-Americans. Did they say anything for us Americans?
Azgunlover69
Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2018
- Messages
- 767
Dauph said:
Last I read like a week ago the Biden admin announced they were canceling enforcement of the mandate...?
Azgunlover69 said:
I believe they are trying something else. Channel 10 had a brief moment on it this morning. This is from last week
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/2-5-million-truckers-say-theyll-quit-over-vaccine-mandate-industry-warns-biden
Seems about par for the course with this circus.
Similar threads
