Benchmade Knifes helps police destroy guns

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

338lapua

Member
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
1,470
I have quite a few of their knifes but I will not buy anymore. Seems they have no problem helping a police department chop up firearms that should be sold to the public.


https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2019/02/21/benchmade-helps-destroy-guns/
 
I'm on the fence on this one. The PD removed this post from their FB account. Ooops...
I'm sure the owner of BM called the chief and torn him a new one.

Damage is done in the cyber world though.
 
What Benchmark should have done is say, "Chief, you know we are strong supporters of LE, but in this case, I am afraid we cannot help you carry out an order that we believe is wrong -- any more than a tattoo artist in Nazi Germany should have cooperated with a request to tattoo Jews on the wrist, or an American construction company should have accepted a contract to build internment camps for America citizens whose grandparents were born in Japan. In this case, you will have to find somebody else to destroy those guns; we want no part of it."

If an American company who is a strong supporter of LE (say Smith & Wesson or Ruger) gets a request from the local PD to help them locate gun owners with "red flag" orders to confiscate, should they support their local police, or should they stand on principle and say "Find somebody else to do your dirty work"?
 
338lapua said:
I have quite a few of their knifes but I will not buy anymore. Seems they have no problem helping a police department chop up firearms that should be sold to the public.


https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2019/02/21/benchmade-helps-destroy-guns/


Oregon state law prohibits the confiscated firearms from being sold to anyone. I think Benchmade was just doing the PD a favor, hoping to get some good will for future knife sales to the PD.

Whoever allowed a photo to be posted to social media should be fired...that was the truly stupid move.
 
The PD has stated that several of these guns were turn ins. They were not connected to any crime. Oregon law does allow for these guns to be sold. The local PD just didn’t want to.

In any case benchmade didn’t have to help them destroy the guns. They were in no way obligated to help. They chose to.

Plus the owner of benchmade has donated tens of thousands to gun grabbing politicians.
 
smithers599 said:
What Benchmark should have done is say, "Chief, you know we are strong supporters of LE, but in this case, I am afraid we cannot help you carry out an order that we believe is wrong -- any more than a tattoo artist in Nazi Germany should have cooperated with a request to tattoo Jews on the wrist, or an American construction company should have accepted a contract to build internment camps for America citizens whose grandparents were born in Japan. In this case, you will have to find somebody else to destroy those guns; we want no part of it."

If an American company who is a strong supporter of LE (say Smith & Wesson or Ruger) gets a request from the local PD to help them locate gun owners with "red flag" orders to confiscate, should they support their local police, or should they stand on principle and say "Find somebody else to do your dirty work"?

Except the owners of BM are lefties, ONLY donate to dems, and any intermingling of their marketing at gun related events are just that, marketing.
 
sonofbp said:
smithers599 said:
What Benchmark should have done is say, "Chief, you know we are strong supporters of LE, but in this case, I am afraid we cannot help you carry out an order that we believe is wrong -- any more than a tattoo artist in Nazi Germany should have cooperated with a request to tattoo Jews on the wrist, or an American construction company should have accepted a contract to build internment camps for America citizens whose grandparents were born in Japan. In this case, you will have to find somebody else to destroy those guns; we want no part of it."

If an American company who is a strong supporter of LE (say Smith & Wesson or Ruger) gets a request from the local PD to help them locate gun owners with "red flag" orders to confiscate, should they support their local police, or should they stand on principle and say "Find somebody else to do your dirty work"?

Except the owners of BM are lefties, ONLY donate to dems, and any intermingling of their marketing at gun related events are just that, marketing.
I did not know that. Where can I learn more about that?
 
smithers599 said:
Found this: https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/totals.php?id=D000047693&cycle=2018

That's where I saw it and also someone posted a nice graph from someplace similar in the nearly 50 page arfcom thread
 
It looks like starting in 2012, Benchmade increased political spending. They also ceased contributions to Conservative candidates and solely donated to Democrat candidates.

Benchmade donated to two primary state officials in 2017-2018.
The first is Rep. Kurt Schrader. He is the rep for Oregon’s 5th Congressional District. He is not a pro-2a official. In 2012 he was quoted by The Oregonian as saying:

“However, while the immediate focus will inevitably be to ban certain firearms and magazines, the problems we have are more deeply rooted in American society.”, after the Connecticut school shooting.

If that 2012 date looks familiar, that is where Benchmade’s political contributions switched from small donations to Conservative candidates, to more substantial contributions to Democratic candidates.

The second contribution is even more puzzling than the first. That donation was to Senator Martin Heinrich of NEW MEXICO. I scrubbed through all of Benchmade’s business listings and couldn’t find any business interests in that state.

Martin Heinrich is an interesting name. He is not well known, but he was one of the names in the hat for Hillary Clinton’s Vice-Presidential candidate for the 2016 election. This guy has MUCH scarier views on the Second Amendment.

In 2018 the Albuquerque Journal as saying:

“It doesn’t matter if you have a folding stock, it doesn’t matter if you have a pistol grip … but it does matter how the action cycles and how fast they (the weapons) can throw lead downrange, and how many times you can pull the trigger before you’re out of ammunition, Those are the functional things that are at the heart of what makes these (guns) so dangerous compared to other firearms.”

Yeah, this guy wants to forget targeting cosmetics and re-define language restricting firearms to function, capability and effectiveness.

Read the interview to grasp the full extent: https://www.abqjournal.com/1153462/heinrich-hopes-to-influence-gun-debate.html

So, now when we look at the totality of circumstances, we see that Benchmade changed politics back in 2012. They supported two leading candidates, both anti-2a Democrats, one of which isn’t even in their state.

Oregon passes controversial Red Flag confiscation laws, and these laws are a very hot button topic in the industry today. Then Benchmade’s local police department asks Benchmade for help in destroying confiscated firearms, and they happily comply.
 
Suck My Glock said:
It looks like starting in 2012, Benchmade increased political spending. They also ceased contributions to Conservative candidates and solely donated to Democrat candidates.

Benchmade donated to two primary state officials in 2017-2018.
The first is Rep. Kurt Schrader. He is the rep for Oregon’s 5th Congressional District. He is not a pro-2a official. In 2012 he was quoted by The Oregonian as saying:

“However, while the immediate focus will inevitably be to ban certain firearms and magazines, the problems we have are more deeply rooted in American society.”, after the Connecticut school shooting.

If that 2012 date looks familiar, that is where Benchmade’s political contributions switched from small donations to Conservative candidates, to more substantial contributions to Democratic candidates.

The second contribution is even more puzzling than the first. That donation was to Senator Martin Heinrich of NEW MEXICO. I scrubbed through all of Benchmade’s business listings and couldn’t find any business interests in that state.

Martin Heinrich is an interesting name. He is not well known, but he was one of the names in the hat for Hillary Clinton’s Vice-Presidential candidate for the 2016 election. This guy has MUCH scarier views on the Second Amendment.

In 2018 the Albuquerque Journal as saying:

“It doesn’t matter if you have a folding stock, it doesn’t matter if you have a pistol grip … but it does matter how the action cycles and how fast they (the weapons) can throw lead downrange, and how many times you can pull the trigger before you’re out of ammunition, Those are the functional things that are at the heart of what makes these (guns) so dangerous compared to other firearms.”

Yeah, this guy wants to forget targeting cosmetics and re-define language restricting firearms to function, capability and effectiveness.

Read the interview to grasp the full extent: https://www.abqjournal.com/1153462/heinrich-hopes-to-influence-gun-debate.html

So, now when we look at the totality of circumstances, we see that Benchmade changed politics back in 2012. They supported two leading candidates, both anti-2a Democrats, one of which isn’t even in their state.

Oregon passes controversial Red Flag confiscation laws, and these laws are a very hot button topic in the industry today. Then Benchmade’s local police department asks Benchmade for help in destroying confiscated firearms, and they happily comply.
The left is spending millions on out of State elections to influence the vote in their favor.
 
Back
Top