ATF's brace ban struck down again

[Gatsby]

There was never a chance that these cases would be used to overturn Chevron. There are two cases which they were specifically asked to overturn it. Loper Bright vs Raimondo and then, more encouragingly, they added Relentless vs Dept of Commerce. Both were heard on the same day in mid-January. Analysis of both cases were indicative of a positive outcome for restricting, or more likely, completely gutting Chevron

 

[smithers599]

Rule of levity? Yep, law can be funny sometimes.

 

[NBC_LT]

So glad former President Trump's BS bump stock ban is finally dead... maybe the brace restriction is next!

 

[QuietM4]

So glad former President Trump's BS bump stock ban is finally dead... maybe the brace restriction is next!

This entire thread is about the brace ban being knocked down. It’s dead.

 

[QuietM4]

It’s nice to have SCOTUS justices that understand what words mean, and not base their rulings on feelings.

 

[BigNate]

There was never a chance that these cases would be used to overturn Chevron. There are two cases which they were specifically asked to overturn it. Loper Bright vs Raimondo and then, more encouragingly, they added Relentless vs Dept of Commerce. Both were heard on the same day in mid-January. Analysis of both cases were indicative of a positive outcome for restricting, or more likely, completely gutting Chevron

Interesting... I'd seen chatter about the Garland case being fertile ground for overturn of Chevron. I'll have to look into those other cases that you mentioned... Thanks for the reference!

 

[NBC_LT]

So glad former President Trump's BS bump stock ban is finally dead... maybe the brace restriction is next!

This entire thread is about the brace ban being knocked down. It’s dead.

I see the bump stock issue as truly dead (SCOTUS interpretation of NFA machinegun definition) at this point and the brace issue as "pending new BS approach" - I thought it was just an ATF rule retraction/change... or am I missing something more concrete? That is why former President Trump's approach to this was so alarming to me, as it was a restriction justified as limiting a "firearm accessory" and not a firearm itself.

 

[scotchtapeman]

So glad former President Trump's BS bump stock ban is finally dead... maybe the brace restriction is next!

This entire thread is about the brace ban being knocked down. It’s dead.

I see the bump stock issue as truly dead (SCOTUS interpretation of NFA machinegun definition) at this point and the brace issue as "pending new BS approach" - I thought it was just an ATF rule retraction/change... or am I missing something more concrete? That is why former President Trump's approach to this was so alarming to me, as it was a restriction justified as limiting a "firearm accessory" and not a firearm itself.

I think the statute defines a stock as being "originally intended" for use on the shoulder - I'm sure its going to be a game of wack-a-mole with the rules though.