EDIT... Sorry for the novel... the question is "if, as a non-operator but serious shooter you were building an SBR / AR Pistol as a tool - what cartridge would you choose. Read on if you have time on your hands...
I'm building an AR pistol for a variety of reasons...
1) I want one...
2) I want to do some CQB type training and learn to better use this sort of weapon...
3) I want something with better energy and range and capacity than a standard handgun, but that can be used in close quarters, can be carried and maneuvered easily in the cab of a truck, and can bring more firepower to the fight than a handgun.
4) Once I feel competent with it I expect it will probably become the preferred nightstand gun...
I bought a generic lower a while ago - mostly so I'd have one - and I'm starting to think about cartridge options. I've "though about" the following:
5.56X45
.300 AAC
9mm
.40 SW
.45ACP
.458 SOCOM
.50 Beowolf
.450 Bushmaster
Right now I'm leaning .300 AAC - and here's why.
I eliminated the pure pistol calibers (9mm, .40SW, .45) because I want more energy and range than I would get out of these. Yes - they come out of a 9.5" barrel nominally hotter than they do from a 4" barrel - but not "enough" hotter. I want this gun to substantially outperform pistols in terms of terminal ballistics - and running a pistol caliber, well, won't.
I eliminated 5.56X45 (and candidly a few others like .224 valk etc.) because I want to be able to load subsonic for use suppressed. I don't know for sure that this is how it would get used - but I want the option and the small fast rifle cartridges either can't get there - or if they do they lack the energy that I'd want.
I have not eliminated the three big-bore cartridges but I'm leaning away from them for a couple of reasons. First - capacity - I understand that .50 Beowulf and .458 SOCOM will get me 10 rounds in a 30 round AR magazine and the Bushmaster will get me 13. When compared to the .300 AAC's 30 round capacity it is a hard pill to swallow. Second - cost to shoot and train - at $150+ per 100 rounds it is 3X the cost to shoot and practice as the .300 AAC. I have not eliminated them because... the energy... I love my .45-70 for a reason, and the idea of a semi-auto SBR/Pistol that shoots a large bullet at energies that are a healthy fraction of the .45-70 is really appealing. I'm just really having a hard time justifying the cost and loss of capacity.
This leaves the .300 AAC blackout. What are the flaws in my logic - and what other cartridges should I be considering?
I'm building an AR pistol for a variety of reasons...
1) I want one...
2) I want to do some CQB type training and learn to better use this sort of weapon...
3) I want something with better energy and range and capacity than a standard handgun, but that can be used in close quarters, can be carried and maneuvered easily in the cab of a truck, and can bring more firepower to the fight than a handgun.
4) Once I feel competent with it I expect it will probably become the preferred nightstand gun...
I bought a generic lower a while ago - mostly so I'd have one - and I'm starting to think about cartridge options. I've "though about" the following:
5.56X45
.300 AAC
9mm
.40 SW
.45ACP
.458 SOCOM
.50 Beowolf
.450 Bushmaster
Right now I'm leaning .300 AAC - and here's why.
I eliminated the pure pistol calibers (9mm, .40SW, .45) because I want more energy and range than I would get out of these. Yes - they come out of a 9.5" barrel nominally hotter than they do from a 4" barrel - but not "enough" hotter. I want this gun to substantially outperform pistols in terms of terminal ballistics - and running a pistol caliber, well, won't.
I eliminated 5.56X45 (and candidly a few others like .224 valk etc.) because I want to be able to load subsonic for use suppressed. I don't know for sure that this is how it would get used - but I want the option and the small fast rifle cartridges either can't get there - or if they do they lack the energy that I'd want.
I have not eliminated the three big-bore cartridges but I'm leaning away from them for a couple of reasons. First - capacity - I understand that .50 Beowulf and .458 SOCOM will get me 10 rounds in a 30 round AR magazine and the Bushmaster will get me 13. When compared to the .300 AAC's 30 round capacity it is a hard pill to swallow. Second - cost to shoot and train - at $150+ per 100 rounds it is 3X the cost to shoot and practice as the .300 AAC. I have not eliminated them because... the energy... I love my .45-70 for a reason, and the idea of a semi-auto SBR/Pistol that shoots a large bullet at energies that are a healthy fraction of the .45-70 is really appealing. I'm just really having a hard time justifying the cost and loss of capacity.
This leaves the .300 AAC blackout. What are the flaws in my logic - and what other cartridges should I be considering?