ID requirement

If it doesn't fit the topic in any of the other forums, and is firearm-related, put it here!
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: ID requirement

#46

Post by shooter444 »

Pro2a, I don't know, I have never had the situation arise, for me. I believe I have read what you questioned, and you are correct. But, remember, you read this on the internet! 8-)

Personally, I don't think about under aged buyers, when all this concern for ID is discussed. Obviously a grave oversight on my part. I guess I figure I can determine age by looking into the buyers face, and if I question his age, deal with it then and there. .

When I have asked people (less than a dozen) why they ask for ID, the automatic response is "I DON'T WANT TO SELL TO A FELON".

Well, I believe I have covered that topic, ad nauseam, above.


User avatar
Flash
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 2497
Joined: May 16th, 2018, 1:56 pm
Reputation: 5

Re: ID requirement

#47

Post by Flash »

XJThrottle wrote: August 7th, 2018, 6:30 am Give him a rep point.
Don't know how to do that.
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: ID requirement

#48

Post by shooter444 »

Flash wrote: August 7th, 2018, 6:04 am To bad we can't do "likes" shooter444 I'd give you one.


You just did, many thanks!
User avatar
XJThrottle
ArizonaShooting.org Bronze Supporter
ArizonaShooting.org Bronze Supporter
Posts: 3021
Joined: June 26th, 2018, 5:43 pm
Reputation: 7
Location: Phoemex

Re: ID requirement

#49

Post by XJThrottle »

Flash wrote: August 7th, 2018, 11:11 am
XJThrottle wrote: August 7th, 2018, 6:30 am Give him a rep point.
Don't know how to do that.
Go into their profile (click on their avatar) and toward the bottom you'll see "rate user".

Allows positive and negative ratings.....for those of you cranky old farts that seem to have a problem with each other lately...
Ranger1
Banned
Banned
Posts: 634
Joined: July 18th, 2018, 5:00 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: Phoenix

Re: ID requirement

#50

Post by Ranger1 »

shooter444 wrote: August 7th, 2018, 8:43 am
YNOTAZ wrote: August 7th, 2018, 7:35 am
Ranger1 wrote: August 7th, 2018, 6:33 am So if you knowingly sell to a bad guy???
I think you answered your own question.
Ranger1 wrote: August 7th, 2018, 6:33 am Then I guess I better buy from a Private party people, not sign the receipt and give no info. That way it can't be tracked to me. Thanks I will do that from Now on.
If you never want a firearm traced back to you, then yes, but didn't you say you take a picture of CCW & DL. That blows the whole anonymity theory.


I think the waters are getting a bit muddied. :roll:

I can't think of any reason why anyone would fear a weapon being traced back to them, just not a problem.

UNLESS :whistle:

You are knowingly doing a "straw purchase sale"!

Or, you knowingly are selling to a prohibited purchaser!

Or, you are selling a stolen weapon!

Or, you originally purchased it from a seller that constantly buys and sells without a FFLicense,... you never know what they are peddling, because they don't know! :hand:
It easy, let's say I buy my sig from a dealer. I'm a good guy I sell it to you. You sell it or trade it to another party. That party gives it to his brother in law as a gift. Someone brakes into his house and steals it along with other stuff. He commits a crime with it kills 3 before the cops shoot him. Now forensics has it calls sig and tracks it to dealer. They give them my name and number. They call me and ask WTF. I say I sold that gun 3 years ago or what ever. In this state I'm free and clear of any wrong doing because of the law. Now if I was one of the 4 people In between the original buyer and the criminal there is no proof I had it and no questions asked.
Ranger1
Banned
Banned
Posts: 634
Joined: July 18th, 2018, 5:00 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: Phoenix

Re: ID requirement

#51

Post by Ranger1 »

YNOTAZ wrote: August 7th, 2018, 7:35 am
Ranger1 wrote: August 7th, 2018, 6:33 am So if you knowingly sell to a bad guy???
I think you answered your own question.
Ranger1 wrote: August 7th, 2018, 6:33 am Then I guess I better buy from a Private party people, not sign the receipt and give no info. That way it can't be tracked to me. Thanks I will do that from Now on.
If you never want a firearm traced back to you, then yes, but didn't you say you take a picture of CCW & DL. That blows the whole anonymity theory.
And later on in this post I said sometimes I would not care for a DL or CCW. Guess when???? When the person selling me a weapon steps out of a police car. Unmarked tahoe or suburban. Detectives car and they are wearing a badge. O I bought a sig 220 elite from a judge in Indiana and he walked me through the metal detectors to his office I paid for it. No receipt he didn't care ,he gave it to me there and he walked me back to my car. That was neat..
User avatar
Stronghand
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 113
Joined: August 7th, 2018, 1:46 pm
Reputation: 2
Location: Peoria

Re: ID requirement

#52

Post by Stronghand »

it's a safe bet to just CVA. Can't hurt right?
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: ID requirement

#53

Post by shooter444 »

How about just one more time, for those who missed it? :whistle:

-----------------------------------------

It has really been cathartic to finally enlighten/discourage the ignorant who think any form of paper work, e.g., driver license, CCW card, rent receipts, pass port, bill of sale, birth certificate, etc. etc.,... will prevent them from legal charges if they sell to a prohibited possessor!

Arizona Law dose not say " selling to prohibited possessors will not be prosecuted, if you have a bunch of paper work!

It simply states " if you knowingly sell to prohibited possessor, you pay the legal price",...period!
[/quote]
Ranger1
Banned
Banned
Posts: 634
Joined: July 18th, 2018, 5:00 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: Phoenix

Re: ID requirement

#54

Post by Ranger1 »

Ok so if the law came to me and said did you know he was bad. I would say nope did not know. That's it free and clear.
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: ID requirement

#55

Post by shooter444 »

Ranger1 wrote: August 7th, 2018, 2:38 pm Ok so if the law came to me and said did you know he was bad. I would say nope did not know. That's it free and clear.
Geeze guy!! You know, this is not rocket science!

Last time, in clear simple english, so even you can understand.

If you HONESTLY say "...nope did not know" ... then, yes, you are free and clear. BUT IF YOU LIED :liar: , and then got caught for lying, you will face prosecution.

And, I'll add a friendly little FYI, just you you, cause you catch on so quick :whistle:,... if you think you can lie to law enforcement and get away with it, you may want to rethink that one. :snooty:

GOT IT... NOW!
Ranger1
Banned
Banned
Posts: 634
Joined: July 18th, 2018, 5:00 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: Phoenix

Re: ID requirement

#56

Post by Ranger1 »

Yes , I will quote Sgt. Schultz from Hogan's Heroes
"I KNOW NOTHING"
User avatar
delta6
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 946
Joined: May 21st, 2018, 8:44 am
Reputation: 14
Location: phoenix

Re: ID requirement

#57

Post by delta6 »

shooter444 wrote: August 7th, 2018, 3:23 pm
Ranger1 wrote: August 7th, 2018, 2:38 pm Ok so if the law came to me and said did you know he was bad. I would say nope did not know. That's it free and clear.
Geeze guy!! You know, this is not rocket science!

Last time, in clear simple english, so even you can understand.

If you HONESTLY say "...nope did not know" ... then, yes, you are free and clear. BUT IF YOU LIED :liar: , and then got caught for lying, you will face prosecution.

And, I'll add a friendly little FYI, just you you, cause you catch on so quick :whistle:,... if you think you can lie to law enforcement and get away with it, you may want to rethink that one. :snooty:

GOT IT... NOW!
Rocket Scientist he is not...... :dance: :naughty:
Ranger1
Banned
Banned
Posts: 634
Joined: July 18th, 2018, 5:00 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: Phoenix

Re: ID requirement

#58

Post by Ranger1 »

delta6-menu2
Thank you for your opinion.
Ranger1
Banned
Banned
Posts: 634
Joined: July 18th, 2018, 5:00 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: Phoenix

Re: ID requirement

#59

Post by Ranger1 »

shooter444 wrote: August 7th, 2018, 3:23 pm
Ranger1 wrote: August 7th, 2018, 2:38 pm Ok so if the law came to me and said did you know he was bad. I would say nope did not know. That's it free and clear.
Geeze guy!! You know, this is not rocket science!

Last time, in clear simple english, so even you can understand.

If you HONESTLY say "...nope did not know" ... then, yes, you are free and clear. BUT IF YOU LIED :liar: , and then got caught for lying, you will face prosecution.

And, I'll add a friendly little FYI, just you you, cause you catch on so quick :whistle:,... if you think you can lie to law enforcement and get away with it, you may want to rethink that one. :snooty:

GOT IT... NOW!
Why would I need to lie to law enforcement?
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: ID requirement

#60

Post by shooter444 »

What, you really think your smart ass remark about "getting off free and clear"
wasn't taken the way you intended? Sorry, everyone isn't as stupid as you and that idiot old troll you are taking over for!

You have graduated to my 'IGNORE LIST' user control panel option. But don't fret, you're in good company, that other Cali brained idiot troll is there and will entertain you, I'm sure!


YOU'RE GONE!!!
Last edited by shooter444 on August 7th, 2018, 5:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply