What if...

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

cool arrow

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2018
Messages
1,867
Location
Ajo
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
So with all the recounting, investigations, affadavits, etc. what IF they found that Trump really won?

What would the process be? Would/could Jobama and Kuntmala be removed and Trump re-instated?

Is there even Constitutional precedent for something like this?

I realize that this would be a LONG long shot, but have been wondering what if it happened.
 
Hard to say, but if they find Biden didn't win, they can't leave him in office, so I would imagine Trump would be in.
 
If they had proof that Trump actually won, I think that he should be in office. Also, they should instantly reverse all of Biden's executive orders. I don't think that would actually happen though since I'm not aware of any law addressing this kind of situation.

On one hand, I think that congress should pass a law addressing this for the future, and on the other hand, I think the Dems would just start doing the election fraud after the elections if such a law existed. It doesn't seem like there's a good solution other than making all of the cheating harder. And maybe making anything related to vote tampering punishable by firing squad. Let's call it what it is... Treason.
 
Biden is THERE folks, until either Kamala-Sutra replaces him, or an opponent does. :roll:
That said, IF found that the Mean-Orange-Man did win here in AZ, would that
fact.....Arizona.....have made THEE difference to tip the scales? :?:

I haven't been following closely, but I seem to recall both Pennsylvania, and Georgia were also highly suspect in the shenanigans.
 
If it does happen Bidin's boys will start lawsuits and recount protests to last way past his term.
So politics will not change the Prezman.
 
The vote count was certified. The election is over. Besides, the “audit” is such a joke that it’s not going to change a thing. The people who are convinced there was coordinated fraud will still be convinced it happened. The ones who are convinced it didn’t happen will still be convinced it didn’t. The ones waiting for actual proof will get nothing but a pile of garbage that wouldn’t even pass for evidence on Judge Judy.
 
We are in new territory. Never before has there been a third party doing a fraud investigation.

If proof comes forward that Binden did not when the election for President, we can only speculate on its impact.

I have a feeling that regardless of opinion, we shall soon see what happens.
 
How about this scenario?

Joe/Kumala are removed from office, number 3 in line is sworn into office.

President Nancy Pelosi.
 
The President is not elected by us common people.
The electoral college selects the president and it can follow the choice of the voters or it can choose otherwise.

The recount is another dog and pony show to keep the interested commoners preoccupied so they do not notice the other misdeeds of the politicians.

If the recount found enough fraud to change the results, it would make a good news story, but nothing would change; Biden would still be POTUS.

The only opportunity the voters had passed when SCOTUS refused to hear any cases concerning fraud.
 
baja said:
How about this scenario?

Joe/Kumala are removed from office, number 3 in line is sworn into office.

President Nancy Pelosi.

And that is the best reason why everyone should be praying for Joe's health.
 
baja said:
How about this scenario?

Joe/Kumala are removed from office, number 3 in line is sworn into office.

President Nancy Pelosi.

SOH is number two in line, not third. I do wish you folks would attempt better logic with what you write.


Have a great gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde
 
kenpoprofessor said:
baja said:
How about this scenario?

Joe/Kumala are removed from office, number 3 in line is sworn into office.

President Nancy Pelosi.

SOH is number two in line, not third. I do wish you folks would attempt better logic with what you write.



Have a great gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

No, it’s President, Vice President, then speaker, she’s 3rd in line.
 
Gunslinger808 said:
kenpoprofessor said:
baja said:
How about this scenario?

Joe/Kumala are removed from office, number 3 in line is sworn into office.

President Nancy Pelosi.

SOH is number two in line, not third. I do wish you folks would attempt better logic with what you write.



Have a great gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

No, it’s President, Vice President, then speaker, she’s 3rd in line.

If the president is already in the position, then the VP is first, the SOH is second. Jeezus, did some of you fail math or logic???

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Presidential_line_of_succession




Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde
 
kenpoprofessor said:
Gunslinger808 said:
kenpoprofessor said:
SOH is number two in line, not third. I do wish you folks would attempt better logic with what you write.



Have a great gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

No, it’s President, Vice President, then speaker, she’s 3rd in line.

If the president is already in the position, then the VP is first, the SOH is second.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Presidential_line_of_succession




Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde
This is true.
 
A/C Guy is right about the electoral college. Your vote actually means nothing. But, the uncovering of the fraud at least gives moral pretext and cover for the necessary violence of an actual insurection. What good is the seeking of that tool unless it shall be used? There is no peaceful way out of this (unless you accept giving up).
 
kenpoprofessor said:
Gunslinger808 said:
kenpoprofessor said:
SOH is number two in line, not third. I do wish you folks would attempt better logic with what you write.



Have a great gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

No, it’s President, Vice President, then speaker, she’s 3rd in line.

If the president is already in the position, then the VP is first, the SOH is second. Jeezus, did some of you fail math or logic???

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Presidential_line_of_succession




Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

No...no on math, but did major in English.... :naughty:
Third in line, 2nd in succession.

Have a great kenpo gun carrying day. :lol:
 
delta6 said:
[

No...no on math, but did major in English.... :naughty:
Third in line, 2nd in succession.

Have a great kenpo gun carrying day. :lol:

For the second straight day watching MSNBC's evening lineup I've noticed several people, who are usually details oriented people, referring to the office of Speaker as "third in line" to the Presidency. Has the law changed recently and I haven't heard about it or has the English language seen a seismic shift in the meaning of the word "third"? If it is neither, then the Speaker of the House is second in line to the Presidency, not third. I love Rachel and her show, but she's made the mistake at least twice in the last two nights. Two journalists have also made the mistake. It is not that difficult of a concept.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/10/8/1429661/-Third-in-Line-Has-the-Law-or-English-changed-meaning


Clyde
 
Felons are prohibited, all the horrible things people think of the dems and tactics are getting pointed at a conviction, any conviction, then felony record end of politics. That is their game at this time.
 
kenpoprofessor said:
delta6 said:
[

No...no on math, but did major in English.... :naughty:
Third in line, 2nd in succession.

Have a great kenpo gun carrying day. :lol:

For the second straight day watching MSNBC's evening lineup I've noticed several people, who are usually details oriented people, referring to the office of Speaker as "third in line" to the Presidency. Has the law changed recently and I haven't heard about it or has the English language seen a seismic shift in the meaning of the word "third"? If it is neither, then the Speaker of the House is second in line to the Presidency, not third. I love Rachel and her show, but she's made the mistake at least twice in the last two nights. Two journalists have also made the mistake. It is not that difficult of a concept.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/10/8/1429661/-Third-in-Line-Has-the-Law-or-English-changed-meaning


Clyde
Kenpo is correct.
 
Back
Top