Safariland is in deep doo-doo
- Thread starter Suck My Glock
- Start date
Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!
Join today!
Crippledtrigger
Member
They have been making these for around 45 years or more that I know of. I used them in the late very 80s I believe. So not new.
Should they stop making all the other law enforcement or military products the are outrage of the day fodder just cause some group bitches.
Should they stop making all the other law enforcement or military products the are outrage of the day fodder just cause some group bitches.
needsmostuff
Member
Don't know a thing, just wondering, if maybe these tests are used by company quaks (Industrial Medicine) that you get sent to if you have an incident on the job ?
Results of those don't go to court but can get you fired.
Results of those don't go to court but can get you fired.
- Joined
- May 15, 2018
- Messages
- 526
needsmostuff said:
These aren’t urinalysis tests to see if someone is under the influence.
These are field tests to check if a found substance is indicative of illegal drugs. You need a sample of the suspected drugs.
needsmostuff
Member
Joe_Blacke said:
Cool , thanks.
- Joined
- May 15, 2018
- Messages
- 201
I retired from the Phoenix PD crime lab (Toxicology and Firearms sections) in 2017. If I didn't have a valid confirmation test that backed up the findings of a positive screening test then I wrote a negative (nothing present) report. While I didn't work in the Controlled Substances section, every section in the crime lab had the same basic protocol. To have a positive result/finding you have to have a valid confirmation test (typically a more sensitive method) that backs up the positive screening test. I authored multiple negative toxicology drug confirmation analysis reports that had a positive drug screen. I'm not saying those tests can't be faulty or dismissing the impact that you could be arrested because of the faulty drug screening test. Just conveying my experience working in a closely related forensic field.
