Pfizer Vaccine Now FDA Approved

Welcome to ArizonaShooting.org!

Join today!

Flash

Member
Joined
May 16, 2018
Messages
2,497
https://www.fda.gov/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine

Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine

On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.
 
We all knew this was coming, and it will probably make life even harder that chose not to get jabbed. It still doesn't change my mind about getting it.
 
Going to make it harder for those still working when their employer mandates it. I am glad I am not in that position.

Good article here BTW on buyer's remorse:

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/08/do_the_people_who_rushed_to_get_the_covid_shot_have_buyers_remorse.html
 
Approved so now FULL disclosure has to be made as to side effects, contraindications etc...
Liability suits forthcoming on municipal govts, employers, schools etc.??
 
Dauph said:
Someone got paid!

Of course they did. The FDA gets almost half of its funding from the companies they're supposed to regulate. Ever since that started, we stopped being the ones they protect.
 
The FDA had to have been paid and/or gone woke. Per Trumps accurate statement, everything that goes woke turns to chit.
 
Tenring said:
The FDA had to have been paid and/or gone woke. Per Trumps accurate statement, everything that goes woke turns to chit.


Who leads the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and who is behind Pfizer’s covid vaccine approval?

Her name is Janet Woodcock.

Besides having a last name teenage boys could have a field day with, Janet has quite the resume…

Ever heard of OxyContin? Or Fentanyl?

These are addictive opioids that the FDA along with Janet Woodcock approved and assured the public were not addictive substances.

These two “FDA APPROVED” pharmaceuticals went on to create full-blown opioid crises amongst teens and has become a drug of choice due to availability. They have both caused countless unnecessary deaths.

There have been opioid task forces set up throughout the world to try and clean up the mess they created.

Purdue Pharmaceuticals, the company behind OxyContin was forced to close its doors after being criminal charged and sued for more than $8 billion for creating the opioid crisis.

Guess who walked away from all liability, got a promotion and is still approving pharmaceuticals?

Janet Woodcock and everyone else at the FDA who “approved” those opioids.
 

Attachments

  • biatch.jpg
    biatch.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 120
Tenring said:
The FDA had to have been paid and/or gone woke. Per Trumps accurate statement, everything that goes woke turns to chit.

Incompetence + Arrogance = Woke

Did the chit come from the woke, or did the woke come from the chit? It's kind of a chicken and the egg scenario.
 
AZ_Five56 said:
Tenring said:
The FDA had to have been paid and/or gone woke. Per Trumps accurate statement, everything that goes woke turns to chit.

Incompetence + Arrogance = Woke

Did the chit come from the woke, or did the woke come from the chit? It's kind of a chicken and the egg scenario.

Agreed

Has anyone read the FULL FDA Approval - reports are coming out that it is only an extension of the Emergency Use. :think:
 
Tenring said:
AZ_Five56 said:
Tenring said:
The FDA had to have been paid and/or gone woke. Per Trumps accurate statement, everything that goes woke turns to chit.

Incompetence + Arrogance = Woke

Did the chit come from the woke, or did the woke come from the chit? It's kind of a chicken and the egg scenario.

Agreed

Has anyone read the FULL FDA Approval - reports are coming out that it is only an extension of the Emergency Use. :think:

From my understanding, it's considered an extension of the EUA for those between 12 and 15 years of age. I believe it's considered fully approved for 16 and up. Although, they somehow got away without releasing the efficacy data which they don't even expect to have compiled until May 2023. :shock:
 
Lots and Lots of people saying no, only extended......I was trying to read the whole thing and need help, my eyes are bleeding..........

Here is a link from Noah:
https://welovetrump.com/2021/08/23/breaking-no-the-vaccine-is-not-fda-approved-not-even-close/
 
Tenring said:
Lots and Lots of people saying no, only extended......I was trying to read the whole thing and need help, my eyes are bleeding..........

Here is a link from Noah:
https://welovetrump.com/2021/08/23/breaking-no-the-vaccine-is-not-fda-approved-not-even-close/
Right from the FDA's website it states its approved for 16 and up and EUA for 12-16.
ETA a lot of people will say a lot of things, but to me you have to go straight to the donkeys mouth...and in this case it may be filled with Woodcock but it appears to be fully approved.
 
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-the-fdas-indefensible-approval-of-the-pfizer-shot#toggle-gdpr

The narrative of "the pandemic of the unvaccinated" collapsed quickly. As I predicted, not only did the data show the vaccine barely worked to stop infection, but the protection against critical illness wanes over time and might even induce a form of antibody-mediated viral enhancement, which continuously makes the virus worse. Thus, the more we push boosters, the more we suffer viral enhancement, waning antibodies, and the massive risk of side effects accompanying each shot.

And even though our vaccines are currently working well to prevent hospitalizations, we are seeing concerning evidence of waning vaccine effectiveness over time and against the Delta variant," said Walensky during the briefing. "Additionally, reports from our international colleagues, including Israel, suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early. Given evidence, we are concerned that the current strong protection against severe infection, hospitalization and death could decrease in the months ahead. Especially among those who are at higher risk or who were vaccinated earlier during the phases of our vaccination rollout. In the context of these concerns, we are planning for Americans to receive booster shots."

Stop the tape! Walensky now concedes the following:

There is zero justification to mandate the vaccine given that it doesn't stop infection and transmission.
Even the personal protection from serious illness wanes after about six months or so and increasingly so for those most vulnerable to the virus who need the protection the most.
The vaccine efficacy wanes both over time and with mutant strains that will likely continue.
In a stunning admission, she says that reports from Israel seem to "suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early." This could indicate some degree of antibody dependent disease enhancement. After all, if the immunity is waning, then there is always a concern that the antibodies are strong enough to bind but not strong enough to block, which creates a more dangerous conduit for the virus into the cells, which is what people like mRNA vaccine inventor Dr. Robert Malone have been warning about. The FDA itself conceded in its memorandum (p.52) on the EUA approval of the shots, "Risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown and needs to be evaluated further in ongoing clinical trials."
 
Lots of total BS on the net, as usual. It was approved and all you have to do is go to the FDA website and you'll see it with your own eyes.

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.
 
Azgunlover69 said:
Tenring said:
Lots and Lots of people saying no, only extended......I was trying to read the whole thing and need help, my eyes are bleeding..........

Here is a link from Noah:
https://welovetrump.com/2021/08/23/breaking-no-the-vaccine-is-not-fda-approved-not-even-close/
Right from the FDA's website it states its approved for 16 and up and EUA for 12-16.
ETA a lot of people will say a lot of things, but to me you have to go straight to the donkeys mouth...and in this case it may be filled with Woodcock but it appears to be fully approved.

Finally… someone who gets it. The misinformation campaigns on both sides are very intentional. Don’t be a sucker.
 
Back
Top