Leaked documents SCOTUS overturned Roe v Wade

[Dauph]

Grab the popcorn this will get interesting on both sides.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473

Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows
"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft circulated inside the court.


https://twitter.com/politico/status/1521288272021901312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1521288272021901312%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fsupreme-court-votes-to-overturn-roe-v-wade%2F

 

[Dauph]

https://twitter.com/josh_hammer/status/1521298156247564290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1521298156247564290%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fsupreme-court-votes-to-overturn-roe-v-wade%2F

https://twitter.com/AndrewKsay/status/1521292511766978560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1521292511766978560%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fsupreme-court-votes-to-overturn-roe-v-wade%2F

 

[TacMedic]

It was a planned leak in my opinion.

 

[Drmark]

It was a planned leak in my opinion.

I agree, most leaks now a day are planned. I did not see the overturn coming.

 

[Dauph]

It was a planned leak in my opinion.

I agree, most leaks now a day are planned. I did not see the overturn coming.

Intimidation

 

[mtptwo]

The leaking clerk should be hung from a tree while the remaining clerks watch.

 

[Isnake]

It will be up to each state. Wait, did SCOTUS just return a little bit of power to the states?

 

[THE ICEMAN]

First of all... The person that leaked this draft, should they be found (I believe they will be), can consider their legal career over. This is unprecedented & will not be tolerated...

Secondly... Keep in mind that this is just a draft that has been leaked. It could be months before the decision could come down. The Justices could change their minds/mind...

Thirdly... This is the swamp, anything could happen...

 

[QuietM4]

The crux of the argument for overturning Roe, ""The Constitution makes no reference to abortion and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision". This is going to be a very slippery slope for future cases. The Constitution doesn't make reference or implicit reference to the Internet, television, AR-15's, etc.

I'm still waiting for someone to introduce a law making a vasectomy illegal.

 

[delta6]

It will be up to each state. Wait, did SCOTUS just return a little bit of power to the states?

Yep!! Many of us have been watching this closely for that reason. If this leaked document is the actual decision, this is a states rights issue. This could have some interesting ramifications on a number of issues.

The Constitution does make implicit reference to the Internet, television, AR-15's, etc; the 1st and 2nd Amendments. "Implicit", meaning implied, though not plainly expressed or essentially or very closely connected with.

 

[Cubiclerevolt]

The crux of the argument for overturning Roe, ""The Constitution makes no reference to abortion and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision". This is going to be a very slippery slope for future cases. The Constitution doesn't make reference or implicit reference to the Internet, television, AR-15's, etc.

I'm still waiting for someone to introduce a law making a vasectomy illegal.

That's a non sequitur. If you want to scoop out your organs or snip them. You're free to do so, just like if you want to cover your body in tattoos. All people (inside the womb or out) have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

 

[Jack Dupp]

The crux of the argument for overturning Roe, ""The Constitution makes no reference to abortion and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision". This is going to be a very slippery slope for future cases. The Constitution doesn't make reference or implicit reference to the Internet, television, AR-15's, etc.

I'm still waiting for someone to introduce a law making a vasectomy illegal.

That's a non sequitur. If you want to scoop out your organs or snip them. You're free to do so, just like if you want to cover your body in tattoos. All people (inside the womb or out) have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

100%

 

[delta6]

........
I'm still waiting for someone to introduce a law making a vasectomy illegal.

That's a non sequitur. If you want to scoop out your organs or snip them. You're free to do so, just like if you want to cover your body in tattoos. All people (inside the womb or out) have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
[/quote]

Yet, suicide is generally illegal. Go figure :think:

 

[Dauph]

https://twitter.com/davidharsanyi/status/1521490555909423105?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1521490555909423105%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fin-1982-biden-tried-to-overturn-roe-v-wade%2F

 

[Cubiclerevolt]

Also before any turds in here want to simp for cluster b types defending murder by a prettier name, you better post your physiques so the world can see physiognomy is a real thing.

 

[Jack Dupp]

Also before any turds in here want to simp for cluster b types defending murder by a prettier name, you better post your physiques so the world can see physiognomy is a real thing.

Dude, I had to look that word up. I'm not familiar with what you're talking about, but I'd love to see you expound upon that subject.

 

[Drmark]

Physiognomy (from the Greek φύσις, 'physis', meaning "nature", and 'gnomon', meaning "judge" or "interpreter") is the practice of assessing a person's character or personality from their outer appearance—especially the face.

Good word!

 

[kenpoprofessor]

Honestly, I don't care if a woman has an abortion and murders her child, that's up to her. I do have a problem with these folks calling it a "Constitutional Right" when it's clearly evident it isn't,and never was. SCOTUS sets a precedent, nothing more, the opinions of judges change over time, but it's not "law" in any sense. This was one of those precedents, the court has opined that the "right" doesn't exist in the Constitution, and therefore leaves the power to the States, EG. 9th and 10th Amendments.

On the bright side, maybe it'll cause all these whackjobs from other states to go home where they came from. There's a law on the book from 1901 that bans abortion period, and gives jail time to those assisting.

Now, let's get them to overturn Wickard V. Filburn, and remove all that power the Feds have stolen illegally.


Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

 

[Cubiclerevolt]

Also before any turds in here want to simp for cluster b types defending murder by a prettier name, you better post your physiques so the world can see physiognomy is a real thing.

Dude, I had to look that word up. I'm not familiar with what you're talking about, but I'd love to see you expound upon that subject.

A perfect example is that of Sméagol in LOTR. One look at him can attest to his character.

Usually the twat "male feminist" types are just neck beards with improved hygiene that grovel and say things such as "M'lady, may I beseech you for a crumb of pussy?"

Ironically they get neither but updoots and applause from other soyjack males.

 

[tripletap]

I couldn't care less if women want to murder their children or all the other stuff people do- but i dont want to pay for it-
everyone will face God almighty.. everyone
believe it or not- i have no words for how stupid it is that this is a hot button political issue with wealthy libs that pull chains and play games to fire up their respective fanbases-
we have real issues that effect our country and we spend our energy on this petty BS.
its just another game of disctraction- keep your eyes peeled for the real reason this got " leaked"