Not really sure I get his connection. I follow that gun control and its use of labeling "dangerous groups or people" as being subject to restrictions can be race based .. I just dont get his connection to the Rahimi case.
A group of black people whether they be slaves or freed slaves labeled as dangerous because of the color of their skin or their political motivations is one thing. While there may be some among the group that are dangerous you are labeling the whole group as dangerous based on Race or color. Got it. Bad.
Rahimi is a piece of shit. There is no doubt that he was dangerous as he in fact did dangerous things.
"Between December 2020 and January 2021, Rahimi was involved in five shootings in and around Arlington, Texas. On December 1, after selling narcotics to an individual, he fired multiple shots into that individual’s residence. The following day, Rahimi was involved in a car accident. He exited his vehicle, shot at the other driver, and fled the scene. He returned to the scene in a different vehicle and shot at the other driver’s car. On December 22, Rahimi shot at a constable’s vehicle. On January 7, Rahimi fired multiple shots in the air after his friend’s credit card was declined at a Whataburger restaurant."
https://abovethelaw.com/2023/02/judge-ho-domestic-abuse-gun-rahimi/
Add to that a seemingly self confessed case of Domestic violence and ... he just isnt the poster child for the 2A I want to see and I personally dont see the connection to racism the lawyer was trying to make.
Real tenuous connection between Restricting gun ownership to groups you "DEEM" dangerous and a guy who was an actual danger. What am I missing?