Half Cocked
Member
Starting in 2026, Congress has mandated that all new vehicles sold in the United States must have devices that monitor the driver for "impairment" and then, if the nanny state determines that you are "impaired" disable the vehicle. What could go wrong?
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQVuEgeyh6A[/media]
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eVSnu9SCbE[/media]
What could go wrong here? I mean we trust government bureaucracies like the NHTSA, don't we? :roll: It is for our own good isn't it?
Yes, I trust the government. Completely. :doh:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/tech...t-automotive-kill-switch-mandates/ar-AA1jyyx2
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQVuEgeyh6A[/media]
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eVSnu9SCbE[/media]
There are now fact-checking websites that are designed to counter other fact-checking websites who likewise want to pretend to have the market cornered on factual information. In the end, the vast majority boils down to contradictory talking points and trying to shape a desired narrative. Nobody really knows what the legislation will bring into effect because the relevant decisions haven't been made yet by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
But what is certain is that the provisions included within the trillion-dollar Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will eventually result in some form of driver monitoring. That's likely to come by either an ignition interlocking device that would require drivers to utilize a breathalyzer before setting off, or some kind of comprehensive driver monitoring system that uses audio-visual cues to determine the driver's present status.
What could go wrong here? I mean we trust government bureaucracies like the NHTSA, don't we? :roll: It is for our own good isn't it?
I suppose the conclusion is to be wary of everything you're told. Everyone exclaiming that there will soon be ways of remotely disabling your vehicle is absolutely living in the land of conjecture. But so are the groups asserting that there's no cause for concern before the NHTSA decides how to implement the vague regulatory language outlined in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Maybe things would have gone more smoothly if this wasn't buried in an expansive, 1,039-page piece of legislation nobody had time to read before voting. I certainly would have felt better about it if it had been part of a document focused entirely on automotive safety regulations and given time for critical assessments. But it wasn't and that has upset people who are now trying to express concerns that are being strategically dismissed on the grounds that they're not qualified to even discuss the topic.
Yes, I trust the government. Completely. :doh:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/tech...t-automotive-kill-switch-mandates/ar-AA1jyyx2