Arizona Joins Multistate Amicus Brief to Uphold Laws Restricting Gun Magazine Capacity

[Half Cocked]

MADISON, Wis. (WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PRESS RELEASE) - Attorney General Josh Kaul has joined a coalition of 19 other attorneys general in supporting the state of California’s efforts to restrict the capacity of firearms magazines within its borders. The coalition filed an amicus brief Wednesday in support of California in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court, arguing that California’s prohibition on the possession and sale of large-capacity magazines is consistent with the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

Joining Attorney General Kaul in this amicus brief are the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawai’i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...restricting-gun-magazine-capacity/ar-AA1kR3FV

 

[DM47]

AZAG Kris Mayes: also upholding and strengthening the ability to continue fraudulent elections.

 

[admin]

Reach out to the AG office and voice your displeasure of them signing on to this on behalf of AZ.

Let them know that they have lost your confidence, support and vote (not that any of us voted for her).

https://www.azag.gov/contact-us

 

[Jay Gee]

I sent a message but really, do they listen? Or care? Still, gotta keep trying.

 

[GunNut]

They can rot in a sewage pit for life too
Restrict my ass

 

[Limper]

My statement,

"As a native-born Arizonan who has resided in this state for 58 years, I have seen a wide variety of legislative and judicial efforts from both sides of the political divide over that period. However, you take the cake with this blatant effort to corrode our right to bear arms by signing the amicus brief supporting the state of California to restrict the capacity of firearms magazines. You have lost my confidence, support, and vote for any future endeavors."

 

[kenpoprofessor]

My statement,

"As a native-born Arizonan who has resided in this state for 58 years, I have seen a wide variety of legislative and judicial efforts from both sides of the political divide over that period. However, you take the cake with this blatant effort to corrode our right to bear arms by signing the amicus brief supporting the state of California to restrict the capacity of firearms magazines. You have lost my confidence, support, and vote for any future endeavors."

Really??? He never had, nor will he ever have your support, why use these terms as a euphemism? Just tell him he's a lying, dog faced, pony soldier and he needs to go back and play ASSstronaut.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

 

[admin]

Clyde - Unfortunately, it's a game. If you send them a message like you're suggesting, they know that you were one that never had their support to begin with and they won't care. If you send a message like the one Limper wrote, you come off as someone who may have been a supporter (and they know they had a narrow election victory), and now they have lost support and a vote.

That's why it's more effective.

 

[Limper]

When you post things to these sites you aren't really speaking to the Speaker. Probably just an intern who will log the responses under "positive", "negative", or "neutral". The Speaker will probably just get a blip in a brief about the nature and number of responses on this issue. I chose to respond like Admin:

Reach out to the AG office and voice your displeasure of them signing on to this on behalf of AZ.

Let them know that they have lost your confidence, support and vote (not that any of us voted for her).

You use whatever words make you feel better Clyde and I will leave you the last word if you feel like responding. Thanks OP for bringing the issue to my attention.

 

[DM47]

My statement,

"As a native-born Arizonan who has resided in this state for 58 years, I have seen a wide variety of legislative and judicial efforts from both sides of the political divide over that period. However, you take the cake with this blatant effort to corrode our right to bear arms by signing the amicus brief supporting the state of California to restrict the capacity of firearms magazines. You have lost my confidence, support, and vote for any future endeavors."

Really??? He never had, nor will he ever have your support, why use these terms as a euphemism? Just tell him he's a lying, dog faced, pony soldier and he needs to go back and play ASSstronaut.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

Curious; do you have Mayes confused with Mark Kelly?

 

[kenpoprofessor]

My statement,

"As a native-born Arizonan who has resided in this state for 58 years, I have seen a wide variety of legislative and judicial efforts from both sides of the political divide over that period. However, you take the cake with this blatant effort to corrode our right to bear arms by signing the amicus brief supporting the state of California to restrict the capacity of firearms magazines. You have lost my confidence, support, and vote for any future endeavors."

Really??? He never had, nor will he ever have your support, why use these terms as a euphemism? Just tell him he's a lying, dog faced, pony soldier and he needs to go back and play ASSstronaut.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

Curious; do you have Mayes confused with Mark Kelly?

Both of them are jackoffs, but yea. Kelly is supporting the bill in Congress right now.

Have a great, gun carryin', Kenpo day

Clyde

 

[xerts1191]

Do not comply

 

[QuangTri]

+1

Will not comply with any of this sort of treasonous political posturing.
Too old to worry about consequences.