What the actual phuck? Handwringing Hoplophobes.

[smithers599]

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/w ... r-written/

The position thus far, then, is: “My daughter has bought a gun for emergencies. This is irrational because we live in a safe area that has hosted only — only! — two home invasions in the past decade. In consequence, I will force her to live in a place that is more dangerous.”
Brilliant.
Dumbfounded’s question then goes fully off the rails:
but now I have to lock my bedroom door at night because I don’t know what she’s going to do.
Has there ever been a better illustration of the weird belief that the mere act of owning a firearm turns even “intelligent, hard-working, responsible” people into murderous psychopaths? The questioner is is talking about his own daughter. He doesn’t know what she’s “going to do”? He has to “lock his bedroom door at night”? Good Lord, man.

OTOH, I have never personally met Charles Cooke. Come to think of it, I have not personally met the alleged, so-called "Donald Trump," either.

[Pale Rider]

Astroturf is a fact. You can't believe anything, especially when the MSM is involved. Even Wikipedia is putting out fake crap, and people believe the shiat. How about Snopes?, proven to be liberal propaganda. The bottom line is question everything and don't be a stooge, unless you have 1st hand knowledge then you don't know.

[shooter444]

"A LIE REPEATED OFTEN ENOUGH BECOMES ACCEPTED TRUTH"... Nazi Propaganda minister-Joseph Goebbels

[shooter444]

#16 Post by smithers599 » Yesterday, 9:16 pm
Come to think of it, I have not personally met the alleged, so-called "Donald Trump," either.


Hmmm,... any particular reason why you used President Trump to make your point?

Why not Hitlery, or, Obammy?

Just wondering.

[shooter444]

I say, Hmmm,... as I wonder.

[smithers599]

#16 Post by smithers599 » Yesterday, 9:16 pm
Come to think of it, I have not personally met the alleged, so-called "Donald Trump," either.


Hmmm,... any particular reason why you used President Trump to make your point?

Why not Hitlery, or, Obammy?

Just wondering.

Let me try to explain using small words. You wrote: "I don't believe the identity of anyone on the internet, until I meet them in person and check their creds,... period." I believe that is impractical and unwise. You have not met "Amy" in person, so you must not believe her identity -- "period." You have not met Charles Cooke in person, so you must not believe his identity -- period. You have not met Donald Trump (or Hillary Clinton, or Barack Obama, or many other people) in person, so you must not believe their identities either.

I believe that it is wise to be skeptical of things you read on the internet, but also to use common sense and judgment as well, and not to deny (or question) that somebody exists just because you haven't met them personally.

Did you understand that explanation? Do you still believe that I am being gullible because I believe that David Hogg exists, even though I have never met him personally? Or, in light of this explanation, have you reconsidered your position?

[shooter444]

Well, first off,... you don't know me or who I have met, so save the diatribe.

Second, no, I have not changed my mind, my question still stands,...

"Hmmm,... any particular reason why you used President Trump to make your point?

Why not Hitlery, or, Obammy?

Just wondering. "

Got an answer??? This time??? Simple enough???

[smithers599]

Well, first off,... you don't know me or who I have met, so save the diatribe.

Second, no, I have not changed my mind, my question still stands,...

"Hmmm,... any particular reason why you used President Trump to make your point?

Why not Hitlery, or, Obammy?

Just wondering. "

Got an answer??? This time??? Simple enough???

That's called misdirection -- changing the subject. You got caught with your pants down when the other poster showed that "Amy" is a real person, so rather than say "I guess I was wrong; I have changed my mind," you say "I can't admit I was wrong so I won't change my mind, and you're a commie pinko Clinton lover, aren't you?"
I used Donald Trump as an example of a person whose existence you acknowledge even though you haven't personally met him or checked him out -- as proof that you yourself don't believe your own words. Too subtle?

It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong, but you haven't and won't admit you're wrong.

[Crippledtrigger]

#16 Post by smithers599 » Yesterday, 9:16 pm
Come to think of it, I have not personally met the alleged, so-called "Donald Trump," either.


Hmmm,... any particular reason why you used President Trump to make your point?

Why not Hitlery, or, Obammy?

Just wondering.

It's just as you thought. Hes a deep state anti trump operative contracted by Russian trolls and assigned to undermine the Bumbling Bafoon of Manhattans standing in Arizona shooting circles with a speciality in conspiracy seeking black helo seeing paranoid likely voters.

Thank god you ferreted him out. Were all safe now.

[shooter444]

Riiight,... I believe you.

[Crippledtrigger]

You're damn right you do. It's your default conspiracy, deep seeded brain washed anti trump pro all things evil on the left he must be.

My god he said trump and wasnt offering to blow him at the time so he must be out for his destruction and the rise of the second comming of the love child of Obama and Hillary. Lab created and genetically engineered to bring out the downfall of your little world.

[shooter444]

Got'ta luv the FOE ignore button!

[Crippledtrigger]

You cant hand handle the truth?

I guess I should have remembered leverm..er..444 history. Spew some crap get pushback and quit playing. At least you didn't leave this time. Wouldnt want to lose you.

[redj]

Leverman = shooter444 ?
I never put that one together , but you might be onto something there

Disclamer "highlights for dramatic purposes only , not intended to mean anything important "
"emotions just to show I really don't care "

[ex462]

pop corn, pop corn , get your pop corn here and enjoy the show.