Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

If it doesn't fit the topic in any of the other forums, and is firearm-related, put it here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Chinaheart
New to ArizonaShooting.org
New to ArizonaShooting.org
Posts: 10
Joined: May 17th, 2018, 11:18 am
Reputation: 0

Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#1

Post by Chinaheart »

It's a win, although I'm sure the empire may try to strike back somehow. And yes, it's a long read...


https://www.dailywire.com/news/31813/ju ... frank-camp

On April 2, an ordinance was passed in Deerfield, Illinois that would ban "assault weapons." Semiautomatic handguns and shotguns were included on the list in addition to semiautomatic rifles. Those who refused to comply with the ordinance would face fines of between $250 to $1,000 per day beginning as early as June 13.

The ordinance states in part:

Assault weapon means:

(1) A semiautomatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a large capacity magazine detachable or otherwise and one or more of the following:

(A) Only a pistol grip without a stock attached;

(B) Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand;

(C) A folding, telescoping or thumbhole stock;

(D) A shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned, but excluding a slide that encloses the barrel; or

(E) A muzzle brake or muzzle compensator.

2. A semiautomatic rifle that has a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than ten rounds of ammunition.

3. A semiautomatic pistol that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and has one or more of the following:

(A) Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand;

(B) A folding, telescoping or thumbhole stock;

(C) A shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned, but excluding a slide that encloses the barrel;

(D) The capacity to accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip.


Handguns banned include the Calico M-110, TEC-9, and Scorpion.


The new rule took effect on April 13, and citizens were to remove the specified weapons from the designated area "before June 13," according to the Village of Deerfield’s official website.

Shortly after the ban was passed, however, the village was hit with two lawsuits – one from Daniel Easterday, and another from John William Wombacher III. Easterday was joined by the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and the Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA), and Wombacher by Guns Save Life.

In a press release regarding one of the lawsuits, Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb said:

We moved swiftly to challenge this gun ban because it flies in the face of state law. ...

While the village is trying to disguise this as an amendment to an existing ordinance, it is, in fact, a new law that entirely bans possession of legally-owned semi-auto firearms, with no exception for guns previously owned, or any provision for self-defense.

The new ordinance also provides for confiscation and destruction of such firearms and their original capacity magazines. ...

What is particularly outrageous about this new law is that it levies fines of up to $1,000 a day against anyone who refuses to turn in their gun and magazines or move them out of the village by the time the ordinance takes effect in June. This certainly puts the lie to claims by anti-gunners that "nobody is coming to take your guns."


According to The Chicago Tribune, attorneys for the defense claim that the ordinance is simply an amendment to the Firearm Concealed Carry Act (FCCA), which was enacted in the state of Illinois in 2013, making "gun regulations the exclusive power of the state."

Deerfield has characterized the April ordinance as an amendment to an earlier ordinance that was approved within the permitted time frame [of ten days following the 2013 FCCA]. The initial ordinance defined assault weapons and required safe storage and transportation within village limits.

However, on Tuesday, Circuit Court Judge Luis Berrones issued a "temporary restraining order" against the new ordinance, noting that it was not simply an "amendment" to the FCCA.

In his conclusion in favor of the plaintiff(s), Berrones wrote in part:

The court finds that: (1) the 2018 Ordinance is preempted by the FOIDCA [Firearm Owners Identification Card Act] and the FCCA [Firearm Concealed Carry Act] and therefore unenforceable. (2) The 2018 Ordinance is a new Ordinance and not an amendment of the 2013 Ordinance and is therefore preempted by FOIDCA and FCCA. (3) The 2018 Ordinance does not prohibit ownership or possession of large capacity magazines.

The court also finds that: (1) plaintiff has raised a fair question that he has a clearly ascertainable right not to be subject to an unenforceable ordinance's restrictions, prohibitions, fines, penalties and resulting deprivation of full use and enjoyment of his property; (2) plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm absent an injunction as he will not be able to pursue a remedy that will fully compensate him if he is subject to an unenforceable ordinance whose subject matter is preempted by the State. ...

It is hereby ordered that:

1. A temporary restraining order is issued enjoining defendant Village of Deerfield, its agents, officials or police department from enforcing any provision of the 2018 Ordinance relating to the ownership, possession, storage or transportation of assault weapons or large capacity magazines within the Village of Deerfield.

A statement issued on the Village of Deerfield’s officials website Tuesday reads: "We are reviewing with our legal team the full written opinion that the Judge entered. We will, of course, honor the order issued by the Court and temporarily not enforce the ordinance; but we are certainly going to review all of the options available to the Village, including the right to appeal the decision to the Illinois Appellate Court."


User avatar
Tenring
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 2483
Joined: June 2nd, 2018, 10:13 am
Reputation: 7
Location: Cave Creek

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#2

Post by Tenring »

Not sure where Deerfield is exactly, but good for them.
User avatar
Azbuilder
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 206
Joined: May 27th, 2018, 3:47 am
Reputation: 0
Location: sun city

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#3

Post by Azbuilder »

Short term win ! Sounds like judge ruled based on the villages link to a state law.


Evil "shrouds" and "large cpacity magazines" , seems subjective what's large to you might be small to me ! As always picked on those pistol grips.......good ergonomics should not be punished let alone helping to meet ADA standards...
Last edited by Azbuilder on June 14th, 2018, 5:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#4

Post by shooter444 »

Tenring wrote: June 13th, 2018, 5:35 pm Not sure where Deerfield is exactly, but good for them.
Is this a typo or am I miss reading?
Are you really supporting the Deerfield ban on self defense weapons?
User avatar
Tenring
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 2483
Joined: June 2nd, 2018, 10:13 am
Reputation: 7
Location: Cave Creek

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#5

Post by Tenring »

Miss reading.
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#6

Post by shooter444 »

Tenring wrote: June 15th, 2018, 2:39 pmMiss reading.


Thanks, but, please straighten me out, why you are saying "good for the town of Deerfield", when they are banning legal weapons?

thanks
User avatar
Mr_Maim
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 115
Joined: May 22nd, 2018, 4:40 pm
Reputation: 1
Location: Mesa

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#7

Post by Mr_Maim »

GOOD.

F-you Deerfield.
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#8

Post by shooter444 »

Tenring wrote: June 15th, 2018, 2:39 pmMiss reading.
I don't think so.
User avatar
Tenring
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 2483
Joined: June 2nd, 2018, 10:13 am
Reputation: 7
Location: Cave Creek

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#9

Post by Tenring »

shooter444 wrote: June 19th, 2018, 3:30 pm
Tenring wrote: June 15th, 2018, 2:39 pmMiss reading.
I don't think so.
Not really interested in what you think.
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#10

Post by shooter444 »

I always find it rather cute how the left loses their water when confronted with the slightest question about their published position, or statements. :lol:
Ranger1
Banned
Banned
Posts: 634
Joined: July 18th, 2018, 5:00 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: Phoenix

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#11

Post by Ranger1 »

Here it is
images-15.jpg
images-15.jpg (9.88 KiB) Viewed 8699 times
User avatar
Crippledtrigger
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1326
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 2:20 pm
Reputation: 1
Location: AZ. via TX.

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#12

Post by Crippledtrigger »

This is more a political subdivision preemption win than a pro 2nd win. Still I love seeing such bad things happen to good traitorous libtards and their leavings.
Ranger1
Banned
Banned
Posts: 634
Joined: July 18th, 2018, 5:00 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: Phoenix

Re: Judge Blocks Illinois ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

#13

Post by Ranger1 »

Crippledtrigger wrote: March 29th, 2019, 1:09 pm This is more a political subdivision preemption win than a pro 2nd win. Still I love seeing such bad things happen to good traitorous libtards and their leavings.
God dammm the one thing we can both agree on.
Post Reply
cron