California refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.

If it doesn't fit the topic in any of the other forums, and is firearm-related, put it here!
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: California refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.

#31

Post by shooter444 »

Flash wrote: October 1st, 2019, 10:56 am Just as a quick aside, when Zimbabwe (Rhodesia now) was run by the white population, it was called "the breadbasket of africa."

Now, under black control, they can't even feed their own people. Almost all the farms are sitting unused and empty.

I believe the main reason they can't feed their people is,...

"run by the white population" = free enterprise economic system

"black control"= socialist/communist dictatorship


User avatar
redj
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 220
Joined: May 19th, 2018, 10:00 am
Reputation: 0
Location: Sonoran Desert

Re: California refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.

#32

Post by redj »

Crippledtrigger wrote: October 1st, 2019, 12:16 pm
shooter444 wrote: September 30th, 2019, 7:14 am Ahhh, yes, nothing like starting the day off with coffee and adding another Ranger Danger alias to my foe/ignore list. :clap:

And the list just keeps on getting longer,... :dance:

17-21-23
Crippletrigger
HDS
Marine1
Ranger1
YNOTAZ
redj
smithers599
Steve_in_29
stomp442
MarkItZero..........and it only took you 2 weeks with your new alias :whistle:
I hope there is a check mark by my name. Just to put emphasis to the ignore.

Outting as leverman is apparently a ignore-able offense.

Apparently leverman thinks his posts are more relevant when he mentions his list.
He is obviously pretty proud of it.
User avatar
MarkItZero
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 574
Joined: September 13th, 2018, 6:52 pm
Reputation: 8
Location: Tombstone, AZ

Re: California refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.

#33

Post by MarkItZero »

Casual lurking and 13 posts got me on the list, AFAIK leverman is the only one who has ever blocked me

Was the leverman handle banned?
User avatar
Crippledtrigger
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1326
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 2:20 pm
Reputation: 1
Location: AZ. via TX.

Re: California refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.

#34

Post by Crippledtrigger »

I'll PM you. I dont want a line thru my name on his list. I guess I would really be in trouble then.
User avatar
Mauser98
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 134
Joined: July 31st, 2018, 11:52 pm
Reputation: 2
Location: Mesa

Re: California refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.

#35

Post by Mauser98 »

shooter444 wrote: October 1st, 2019, 8:12 am
Mauser98 wrote: September 29th, 2019, 7:54 pm
I agree. And actually I think the long term goal is to confiscate all white-owned land a la Rhodesia and South Africa.
I have been going over your statement above, again and again, but I can't quite get where you're coming from, in relation to Gun Control. But I put these thoughts together, in reply, anyway.

Rhodesia was a country of a black population, conquered and made a colony/possession of Great Britain for over 3/4 of a century until Great Britain's own Rhodesian resident white population basically through off Great Britain control, like we did. Now, the blacks of Rhodesia, basically the original native population, is reclaiming their country by throwing out the white population that did it to them in the first go-a-round. If memory serves me?

So, for me, to relate to your statement, I keep getting the vision that,... for a similar land grab, in line with the current Rhodesian land grab/race war/genocide movement, it would necessitate (for my thinking) that the North American original Native American population would have to be at the head of said land grab here in the US of A, pushing all, white/black/brown, etc., land owners back to where they came from.

I say this, looking strictly from a utopia type moral perspective, the Rhodesian political movement today, is in line with the acquiring and reacquiring cycle of countries/nations that has been going on forever. The main concern to most involved, is, which end of the stick you have a hold on, this go-a-round. ;) . I don't like it, or dislike it, but, these types of historic happenings, barring outright war, is how all lands have been dealt with throughout history.

So, looking at the bigger picture,... I doubt that the white One World Government grabbers would be so race specific if a land grab agenda was on their to-do-list, as you have put it. I think they would take what ever land they want, no matter who owned it,... race not being an issue,... unless of course, using "race" would facilitate their agenda better!!!

jmo
I'm speculating but bear with me for a moment. Firearm ownership is much more common and popular in rural areas than in cities. And it is going to be difficult to take the land away from armed farmers. 96% of the land in America is white-owned. My prediction is that in 20 to 50 years the media will begin saying "why do whites, who are only 35% of the population, own 96% of the land?" It's not 35% yet but it will be. Then the government will propose "buy-back" and redistribution schemes.

I could be totally wrong about it, but that's the sense that I have.

Stage 1: Confiscate the firearms
Stage 2: Confiscate the land
User avatar
shooter444
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 1:17 pm
Reputation: 6
Location: Az desert

Re: California refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.

#36

Post by shooter444 »

Mauser98 wrote: October 1st, 2019, 11:17 pm
I'm speculating but bear with me for a moment. Firearm ownership is much more common and popular in rural areas than in cities. And it is going to be difficult to take the land away from armed farmers. 96% of the land in America is white-owned. My prediction is that in 20 to 50 years the media will begin saying "why do whites, who are only 35% of the population, own 96% of the land?" It's not 35% yet but it will be. Then the government will propose "buy-back" and redistribution schemes.

I could be totally wrong about it, but that's the sense that I have.

Stage 1: Confiscate the firearms
Stage 2: Confiscate the land
-----------------------------------------

I really don't know for a fact, but I will agree that, percentage wise, more rural citizens are probably armed,... but, I would have to assume there are more guns in the cities, just due to the population numbers. I think farmers have more of a threat from corporate entities, than government, if one can separate the two!

Again, I don't know how you got to the percentage of future white owned land, but, I think if one factors in Federal owned, State owned and Corporate owned land in the USA today, I doubt it leaves 96% of the USA for the private citizen purchase. And, as to your 35% white estimated future population figure, the last time I searched population by race, whites were at around 70% of the USA population, twice what you estimate for the future,... that's a whole lot of population shift in 20 to 50 years. You're talking about a reduction of around 150 million people, or more, in 20 years +! My guess is, all the deaths from genocide in the past fifty years, would not even come close to the 150 million estimate,... but, I could be wrong on that. The Nazi act of genocide on Jews, and probably the greatest genocide death toll in history, resulted in the death of approx. 6 million, just for comparison.

As to what the Federal/state/local Governments may do,... that will depend on if we remain a REPUBLIC or become a SOCIALIST Nation. Only VOTING will determine that!

On your last point,... I can't agree with you more,... GUN CONFISCATION will lead to land confiscation and anything else those with the guns want to confiscate,... including lives !!!
Post Reply