The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

If it doesn't fit the topic in any of the other forums, and is firearm-related, put it here!
User avatar
gumpy18
New to ArizonaShooting.org
New to ArizonaShooting.org
Posts: 4
Joined: May 20th, 2018, 7:13 am
Reputation: 0
Location: phoenix

Re: The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

#16

Post by gumpy18 »

55grain fmj was vietnam time, replaced long time ago with 62grain bullets.


User avatar
17-21-23
Banned
Banned
Posts: 300
Joined: July 2nd, 2018, 12:03 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: APACHE JUNCTION

Re: The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

#17

Post by 17-21-23 »

That's what I thought.
User avatar
338lapua
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 1419
Joined: May 18th, 2018, 8:57 am
Reputation: 6

Re: The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

#18

Post by 338lapua »

gumpy18 wrote: August 30th, 2019, 8:26 pm 55grain fmj was vietnam time, replaced long time ago with 62grain bullets.
The 62 grain that likes to tumble. Shooting 855 at 100 yards I have seen them keyhole targets. 62 grain lead core I never had the problem with. Heard a lot of talk about how the 855 ball was not accurate either.
User avatar
17-21-23
Banned
Banned
Posts: 300
Joined: July 2nd, 2018, 12:03 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: APACHE JUNCTION

Re: The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

#19

Post by 17-21-23 »

Well in my opinion if it hits a person straight on they are going to have a bad day. If it hits them while its tumbling they are in for quite an adventure.
User avatar
Steve_In_29
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 921
Joined: June 7th, 2018, 10:52 am
Reputation: 2
Location: St John's, AZ

Re: The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

#20

Post by Steve_In_29 »

338lapua wrote: August 31st, 2019, 7:19 pm The 62 grain that likes to tumble. Shooting 855 at 100 yards I have seen them keyhole targets. 62 grain lead core I never had the problem with. Heard a lot of talk about how the 855 ball was not accurate either.
What barrel twist were you shooting. The original 1-12 WON'T stabilize the 62 grainers causing them to tumble.
User avatar
17-21-23
Banned
Banned
Posts: 300
Joined: July 2nd, 2018, 12:03 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: APACHE JUNCTION

Re: The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

#21

Post by 17-21-23 »

I don't know what he's using but my issued M4 had 1in7
User avatar
Steve_In_29
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 921
Joined: June 7th, 2018, 10:52 am
Reputation: 2
Location: St John's, AZ

Re: The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

#22

Post by Steve_In_29 »

17-21-23 wrote: September 1st, 2019, 5:46 pm I don't know what he's using but my issued M4 had 1in7
Which is irrelevant to the question I asked 338lapua but fulfilled your need to hear yourself talk I guess.
User avatar
17-21-23
Banned
Banned
Posts: 300
Joined: July 2nd, 2018, 12:03 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: APACHE JUNCTION

Re: The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

#23

Post by 17-21-23 »

This is a open fourm. You don't dictate who can talk and who cannot. You need to stop trying to control people and their opinions.
User avatar
Steve_In_29
ArizonaShooting.org Member
ArizonaShooting.org Member
Posts: 921
Joined: June 7th, 2018, 10:52 am
Reputation: 2
Location: St John's, AZ

Re: The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

#24

Post by Steve_In_29 »

17-21-23 wrote: September 1st, 2019, 6:23 pm This is a open fourm. You don't dictate who can talk and who cannot. You need to stop trying to control people and their opinions.
You are free to post all you want, never said you couldn't. Just like I am free to point out the irrelevancy of what you post.

It's an open forum after all.
User avatar
17-21-23
Banned
Banned
Posts: 300
Joined: July 2nd, 2018, 12:03 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: APACHE JUNCTION

Re: The Army’s SAW and M4 replacements;

#25

Post by 17-21-23 »

Your right and I can always follow you up and discuss how your opinion is just that.
Post Reply